Search results

The Barnes deal was one of the worst in recent memory and I still don't understand it. Bringing Sasha to the team and then not using him is another "WTF?" move. Moves need to be made to get some real talent and nobody is off the block IMHO. Ellis pickup is a good move but we need a legit third...

This is true, however their offense is garbage. It relies on the DHO and screen/roll and there's literally no other schemes or good ball/player movement. The ball movement from Pels also exploited so many defensive issues. WHY are the bigs switching off on screens? It opened up so many holes...

Poetic justice if the idiotic contract they gave Barnes hampers them from being able to sign Monk.

TH is the best PG in the league. Good for him.

We've been saying all year Barnes needs to be parked on the bench but he has 3-4 good games and people think that makes up for him disappearing all season. Lyles, Murray, Sasha need to be the forward rotation. They consistently out produce him in rebounds and defensively.

We don't need a core. We need role players. The Kings core of Webber, Divac, and Peja was there. The surrounding players all changed year in year out. We have Sabonis, Fox, and Keegs. There were players to be had to move the pieces around and we aren't getting any better. Opportunities to build...

Book showing Fox how it's done at the line.

I will never understand this mentality. Reason being is it should make you value the rare opportunities to win, and want them to not be squandered by poor decisions instead of the "just be thankful for what you get".

So Fox getting calls when not an all star...have we unlocked the code?

LD might just be the best player in the league.

Robert Horry ringing any bells? Tell me he wasn't impactful.

We can agree to disagree. I don't think GP cares about how the move is perceived to deal Corliss, Barry, amd JWill which were all fan favorites and good teammates to build a contending team. Players either want to win or get paid (or both). If they feel they have a better chance to win they...

Tell me would the team be equally upset if he signs elsewhere either to a contender or getting his bag, or would they all say they want the best for him and are professionals? Sometimes I wonder about this fanbase. These players are professionals and understand the business.

I don't really care "what goes over well". I care about winning. If Monk isn't here next season of his own volition after internal discussions then what difference does it make? Remember when Bonzi turned down 30+ million and went his own way and was out of the league soon after? Either a player...

Is that a joke? This team lacks backcourt depth, interior defense, and the toughness both physically and mentally to win in the playoffs. That's why Draymond and Looney ate the Kings lunch and Curry drove the dagger home in the playoffs. The Kings folded. If Kevin and Barnes and Sabonis...

Anybody else think we should deal Monk in a package as an expiring asset with value and then compete on the FA market for him if thy want him? They will be doing that anyway.

I think if he didn't have better scoring years and then absolutely had Looney eat his lunch we'd be just happy with what we have. But we know he has the skills to be more versatile as a scorer. He just doesn't even when that's what might be needed in tight stretches. Here's hoping the Kings...

I'm kind of in this camp. This team is never going to lock anyone down. Their best bet is the assassin/glass canon build. All eggs in the offensive basket.

It's also curious how he's still hesitant to shoot considering his time in Indy at the 4 shooting amd scoring more! That play where he was all alone in the corner and instead dribbled towards KH to set a moving pick and caused a TO was so frustrating.

Role players shouldn't need plays called for them though. He's been incredibly apathetic on the boards and on defense all year.