GM Pete D'Alessandro SPEAKS! SF search

Kingster

Hall of Famer
"Tyreke was definitely going to be too much money." DA didn't say he'd probably be too much money or was too much money; he said he was definitely too much money. So in other words, he just didn't value him nearly as highly as some on this board. It's not that he doesn't like defense or the ability to drive the ball; he just didn't want to overpay in order to get it (Iggy fits into this picture also). If Tyreke ends up to be an All Star in a couple of years, he'll be proven to be wrong. If not, then he'll be right. And by the way, there will be a ton of GMs around the league who were wrong as well, because it's obvious they didn't see Tyreke as a predestined future All Star.
 
Good that you do not. I did not wrote that post for you or thinking about your position. I do not even know what you think and honestly I do not care. It was for everybody, just a general post.

Answering your message, what's "the process" you are talking about? 2-2.5 a half week process? What they did - 1) drafted Ben (ok defender, good D potential); 2) let Tyreke go (believed he was a bad fit with this roster and did not like his cost); 3) brought Vasquez (bad defender, no question, but he is a better fit for Ben and DMC and Tyreke could not bring you a good passer and defender, hey only one team really wanted him); 3) tried to acquire Iggy (great defender) and Calderon (good passer to help Ben first of all and also DMC). They work in a do-what-i-can mode, not a do-what-i-want one. It's been just days and you already know "the process". Give Vivek and PDA at least one full offseason or better one year to do their thing.
a) bad timing. like, really bad. b) all the talk so far has been about offensive fits, improving ball movement and shooting, not a peep has been made about frontcourt defense. c) they just freaking signed Carl Landry completely and utterly confirming all the doubts we had (at which point I direct you to point a)). d) your general point was directly attacking those of us that have dared questioning the direction this whole thing has been taking, making it not a general point at all and, in fact, creating a strawman, I called you out on it that is all.
 
That combo only works if you have a playmaking small forward

Evans and McLemore might not have worked for 2-3 years (if then) and ensuring that we limit our endless sf search to a point forward. Evans was limited at seeing the floor and creating easy baskets. McLemore will probably get to where he needs to be but he played in the post for a good chunk of HS. There is a reason his handles and particular play making aren't where they should be right now. That backcourt would have some serious issues.

I think the super fandom here is creating a disconnect between what many would like to see happen and what actually needs to happen to create a winner. This team is not close and in need of just a few tweaks. Its a team, roster, and culture that's been permeated with losing, disfunction, selfish basketball, and unhappiness with the franchise, style of play and other teammates. That's hard to break up.

They want to give Cousins until February to turn it around and they probably won't extend him because: (1) they hope the max extension serves as a carrot to make him get in world class shape, perform, and behave better ... and then build upon his success; (2) if that happens, they will offer him a 5 year max on the first day of free agency and match any 4 year max offer. And if Cousins doesn't pan out, he's gone at the deadline and it's a complete blow up.

McLemore is an ideal 2nd banana for Cousins because he's a shooter, athlete, but not selfish about shots.

So that's the foundation for now. After that ... it's hard to scrub the selfishness, pockets of dislike, losing, and disfunction off the players and franchise. Like anything that's been neglected for a long period of time, you just have to throw a lot out.

To me, the disfunction, lack of trust, and lack of professional basketball players is what's affecting the defense, ball movement, and overall execution more than the individual players. When you play in a pickup game, at some point, if your teammates are hogging the ball, not executing on defense, and you keeping losing -- at some point, it really hurts your effort, shot selection, and sharing the ball. Here, that's gone on with some of the same crew for years. They don't trust each other. I bet a lot of them don't really like each other.

I would assume McLemore, Cousins, and Thompson will be here in 3 years. Maybe Vasquez if he gets a lot better. If IT wants to be a 3rd guard that works cheap, he might be around. Everybody else is gone in two years ... or maybe less. And that's needed. Get value when you can, but they need to bring in professional basketball players that will help remake and repair the culture. Thus, they tried to bring in Igudala and Calderon. They passed, so now it's stop gap measures with the same goal in mind and hope for luck in the lottery.

Vasquez was brought in because he's a professional, a good teammate, a willing passer that will radically change the ball movement and pump the ball to Cousins and McLemore. He's got upside and the Kings control his right via restricted free agency. He helps Cousins try to succeed and that's the gamble they've taken over Evans.

But more than that its about culture. At 8 million, the team might have held their nose and brought back Evens to see if they could make him fit. But at 11 he would have been an over paid SG that can't shoot, on a team with money locked into at least 3 SGs and only one they want to keep. More than that ... when Evans pounds the rock or smashes into a crowd, it undoublty affects the chemistry and morale of the team.

This has been a dysfunctional and poorly constructed team for at least 5 years. The front office felt that --- at that price - Evans had to go to address both issues. I'm fine with that.

But when you are scratching your head wondering with PDA is waiting for ... or why he's going to over pay some less talented vets on 1 and 2 years deal soon ... it's because he's trying to both completely change the culture and style of this team and make sure he properly pays the right pieces ... while the situation is a mess and people don't want to come. That's what I think. I'd bet that's what PDA thinks.

If you think this team is close and just needs a few tweaks, you may disagree. But this frame of mind might help you understand the moves.
 
D

again, it's always offense, offense, offense with this team and its fanbase. that's all anybody ever talks about around here. "we need more passing" or "we need outside shooters" or "tyreke eats up too much shot clock." i'm kinda aghast by the fact that there are so few at kf.com who aren't concerned about how little PDA seems to value the need for defensively-oriented personnel, as if offense has ever been the kings biggest problem. the kings' defense has been at the bottom of the nba's barrel for seven straight years, people. that is why they've missed the playoffs in each of those seasons, not because "tyreke won't pass the ball" to teammates who are less talented and efficient with their offense (yeah, cuz the likes of omri casspi and chuck hayes needed the ball more. kings fans love to inflate the utility of mediocre role players, and also love to underestimate just how ineptly the previous regime built their team around cousins and evans)...

truth be told, i don't give two ****s that tyreke evans isn't a pass first guard of any kind. he's an efficient scorer, a good rebounder (another team weakness), a solid playmaker, and an above average defender. oh, and he was the only king outside of DMC that could force an entire defense to change their strategy due to his elite rim attack (and, despite the wrong-headed opinions of so many, 'Reke was still regularly beating defenses at the rim to the tune of 64%, which puts him at the top of the league among guards, alongside dwayne wade and tony parker). pair him with players who can also handle the ball and share in the responsibilities of passing (a team-wide problem hardly confined to tyreke), and it matters not an ounce that tyreke isn't as interested in passing as someone like grievis vasquez, who, for the record, will rarely force a defense to do anything at all as an individual talent. he has to react to them, rather than the other way around. unless PDA swings a trade for, say, rudy gay (who is considerably less efficient than tyreke), the kings will not have an adequate second scoring option on top of being a weaker team, defensively. hardly a recipe for the playoffs, wouldn't you say?
I'm not an offense only kind of guy. I hate this Carl Landry signing. Drafting Mclemore pretty much put Tyreke out of a job. He's not good enough to play PG and his skills are diminished playing SF. He's a combo guard at best but he belongs at SG. Did you watch the beginning of last year? We ran Thomas, Evans, Johnson, Thompson and Cousins out there for the first half month or so. Our D was great, we held opponents under 100pts more often than not. The problem was we could barely score 90 ourselves.

With Tyreke running the point, he gets his stats. He could do 20-5-5 every night. It's his teammates that struggle. Yeah he's efficient and he plays D (although it's highly overrated here) but he hurts the team running the point more than he helps it. That's why he's more of a combo guard. He can run it for a while but then he has to go back to playing off the ball for a while or else we can't score enough. While Tyreke is efficient on talent alone, he doesn't make the guys around him more efficient. So if he isn't shooting the ball on that particular possession, chances are someone else on the team is forced to take a bad shot because they weren't set up in the open for a higher percentage bucket. You make it sound like I said Tyreke was the only problem. The only problem I have is when he's forced to play PG for any extended period of time. It drags the offense down to a stand still and hardly makes us competitive with anyone.

If we're going to have Vasquez and Mclemore as our starting guards, then we absolutely have to have a rim protector at center. There's no other way around it. Let those guys dictate the offense and then when they can't cover a guy, let the big men make it tougher on the opposing team to get easy baskets.
 
I'm not an offense only kind of guy. I hate this Carl Landry signing. Drafting Mclemore pretty much put Tyreke out of a job. He's not good enough to play PG and his skills are diminished playing SF. He's a combo guard at best but he belongs at SG. Did you watch the beginning of last year? We ran Thomas, Evans, Johnson, Thompson and Cousins out there for the first half month or so. Our D was great, we held opponents under 100pts more often than not. The problem was we could barely score 90 ourselves.

With Tyreke running the point, he gets his stats. He could do 20-5-5 every night. It's his teammates that struggle. Yeah he's efficient and he plays D (although it's highly overrated here) but he hurts the team running the point more than he helps it. That's why he's more of a combo guard. He can run it for a while but then he has to go back to playing off the ball for a while or else we can't score enough. While Tyreke is efficient on talent alone, he doesn't make the guys around him more efficient. So if he isn't shooting the ball on that particular possession, chances are someone else on the team is forced to take a bad shot because they weren't set up in the open for a higher percentage bucket. You make it sound like I said Tyreke was the only problem. The only problem I have is when he's forced to play PG for any extended period of time. It drags the offense down to a stand still and hardly makes us competitive with anyone.

If we're going to have Vasquez and Mclemore as our starting guards, then we absolutely have to have a rim protector at center. There's no other way around it. Let those guys dictate the offense and then when they can't cover a guy, let the big men make it tougher on the opposing team to get easy baskets.
in the only season tyreke got significant burn at PG, he had little in the way of talented teammates. DMC was an offseason away. i am much more inclined to fault a front office that loads it's team up with chuckers and other assorted non-defenders than i am to fault a talented combo guard that has not been presented with the kind of franchise conditions that help other players of his talent level succeed around the league. if i had the energy, i'd list every king tyreke played alongside during four seasons. when you see them all lined up, it's so terribly disappointing to recognize just how poorly this team's roster has been managed. demarcus cousins, tyreke evans, and a motley crew of ill-fitting, overrated, non-defensive role players who enjoy pretending that they deserve to hoist as many shots as their more talented teammates. it is never a good idea to bleed talent in favor of such players. and it's an absolute gamble to assume that you can just go out and pluck an equally-talented player via free agency, or through trade, as PDA is quickly realizing. it's embarrassing...
 
Shams Charania ‏@ShamsCharania 5m

RealGM sources: Free agent guard Sam Young is being pursued by the Sacramento Kings on a possible one-year deal. http://tinyurl.com/l4wyfsb

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/228700/Kings-Pursuing-Sam-Young
if this were Jeopardy, my guesses would be: "who was the most useless player in last year's ECF?", "who is most assuredly not going to help your floorspacing at all?", "who is one of the main reasons Indiana didn't make it to the finals?" and "who is this year's James Johnson?"
 
a) bad timing. like, really bad. b) all the talk so far has been about offensive fits, improving ball movement and shooting, not a peep has been made about frontcourt defense. c) they just freaking signed Carl Landry completely and utterly confirming all the doubts we had (at which point I direct you to point a)). d) your general point was directly attacking those of us that have dared questioning the direction this whole thing has been taking, making it not a general point at all and, in fact, creating a strawman, I called you out on it that is all.
All the talk?? You base your opinion on "the talk"? The last thing you wanna do is to listen to "the talk". GMs gives us BS 99% of the time. And it is too early to base our opinion about this new regime's philosophy on a 2 week "process". This team is bad, was and still will be for some time. Hopefully, it will take them a year to construct something that they want. I understand that people are tired that we were so bad defensively for so long that we or some of us expect Vivek and PDA to address this problem right away. But 1) they did not build this defensively horrible team, 2) they are not trying to keep this team the way it is and make some key D additions, they are re-building and re-branding the whole roster and org. We can not judge their efforts by analyzing a 2 week "process" or by what PDA BSed us (not actually us, fans, more mass media). My position was and is very simple - calm down and wait at least some time. It is only a start, not a finish. And you called me out? :)
 
All the talk?? You base your opinion on "the talk"? The last thing you wanna do is to listen to "the talk". GMs gives us BS 99% of the time. And it is too early to base our opinion about this new regime's philosophy on a 2 week "process". This team is bad, was and still will be for some time. Hopefully, it will take them a year to construct something that they want. I understand that people are tired that we were so bad defensively for so long that we or some of us expect Vivek and PDA to address this problem right away. But 1) they did not build this defensively horrible team, 2) they are not trying to keep this team the way it is and make some key D additions, they are re-building and re-branding the whole roster and org. We can not judge their efforts by analyzing a 2 week "process" or by what PDA BSed us (not actually us, fans, more mass media). My position was and is very simple - calm down and wait at least some time. It is only a start, not a finish. And you called me out? :)
at this point: what key additions to improve the defense do you anticipate to happen? could've gone after a shotblocker with that capspace. could've gone after another good perimeter defender, too. blew it on a completely redundant piece that's not going to help the defense at all, though. they also went after Calderon and ended up with Vasquez, quite likely the two worst defenders for their position in the NBA. yet somehow I'm supposed to remain optimistic about a change on the defensive end, whilst the guy in charge has stopped making any noises whatsoever about changing defensive problems and only sells changes on the offensive side?
 
at this point: what key additions to improve the defense do you anticipate to happen? could've gone after a shotblocker with that capspace. could've gone after another good perimeter defender, too. blew it on a completely redundant piece that's not going to help the defense at all, though. they also went after Calderon and ended up with Vasquez, quite likely the two worst defenders for their position in the NBA. yet somehow I'm supposed to remain optimistic about a change on the defensive end, whilst the guy in charge has stopped making any noises whatsoever about changing defensive problems and only sells changes on the offensive side?
I repeat: It is too early. 2 weeks, just 2 weeks. If we have 2 solid NBA starters and 5 Carl Landryes and 5 MTs at the end of the season and play old GS style of basketball, I will be the first one to scream and call for his (PDA+his staff) firing.
 
I repeat: It is too early. 2 weeks, just 2 weeks. If we have 2 solid NBA starters and 5 Carl Landryes and 5 MTs at the end of the season and play old GS style of basketball, I will be the first one to scream and call for his (PDA+his staff) firing.
I reiterate, not judging yet. it all now kinda hinges on the trade that's about to come, if that turns out crap, I'll officially join the detractors camp. just noting that none of the moves appear to be fixing what's really broken and that the rhetoric of the FO doesn't exactly inspire confidence that they will actually address those needs.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
We aren't getting Wiggins. We aren't anywhere close to being that bad
If it was just a matter of being bad, no problem. But people persistent in the notion that the worst team gets the first pick. That's the problem. You can lose all you like but if the lottery doesn't go your way, it doesn't do any good...
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
What PDA says: We want to be a defensive team
What PDA does: Trades the Kings best wing defender for Vasquez, a poor defender

What PDA says: We want to build around Cousins
What PDA does: Sign an undersized, poor rebounding, poor defending, post scoring PF

What PDA says: We'll look at all options
What PDA does: apparently only considers players from Denver & GS

What PDA says: there's a big hole at SF we have to address
What PDA does: so far absolutely nothing

Is it too late to hire Schlenk? I formally renew my objection to any GM who didn't come up as a scout and/or a coach.
 
If it was just a matter of being bad, no problem. But people persistent in the notion that the worst team gets the first pick. That's the problem. You can lose all you like but if the lottery doesn't go your way, it doesn't do any good...
It just seems silly to me that people/management would willingly plot for something like that. Talk about a risk. Even if you are the worst there is a 75% chance you could pick other than #1.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
What PDA says: We want to be a defensive team
What PDA does: Trades the Kings best wing defender for Vasquez, a poor defender

What PDA says: We want to build around Cousins
What PDA does: Sign an undersized, poor rebounding, poor defending, post scoring PF

What PDA says: We'll look at all options
What PDA does: apparently only considers players from Denver & GS

What PDA says: there's a big hole at SF we have to address
What PDA does: so far absolutely nothing

Is it too late to hire Schlenk? I formally renew my objection to any GM who didn't come up as a scout and/or a coach.
What Vivek said: It's not going to be about winning right away. First we have to change the culture. (Paraphrased)
What Vivek (via PDA) does: Brings in a couple of players who are, by all accounts, very hard workers. With Landry, he WANTS to be here and he wants to help. And he wasn't anywhere near as bad before as some have claimed.

It's my belief they're working hard to change the way the Kings are viewed by others around the league. Then and only then will we actually get upper tier free agents to even take our calls. Nobody said it was gonna happen overnight.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
It just seems silly to me that people/management would willingly plot for something like that. Talk about a risk. Even if you are the worst there is a 75% chance you could pick other than #1.
That's how I look at it. Besides, I've seen the Kings take the #1 pick. It didn't end well. ;)
 
What Vivek said: It's not going to be about winning right away. First we have to change the culture. (Paraphrased)
What Vivek (via PDA) does: Brings in a couple of players who are, by all accounts, very hard workers. With Landry, he WANTS to be here and he wants to help. And he wasn't anywhere near as bad before as some have claimed.

It's my belief they're working hard to change the way the Kings are viewed by others around the league. Then and only then will we actually get upper tier free agents to even take our calls. Nobody said it was gonna happen overnight.
If KJ could fight off Balmer and make the Kings stay can we assume he can convince Lebron to play for the Kings next year... like discussed during Lebron's visit to sac last season? Should be a cake walk in comparison, right? =D
 
well, since we are not looking to win right now and we want some proven vets/culture, maybe reaching to retired Bruce Bowen for a year would be an option.
He would be glad to pick remaining 2-3 mil and Kings could claim improvement at one of the positions.
 
well, since we are not looking to win right now and we want some proven vets/culture, maybe reaching to retired Bruce Bowen for a year would be an option.
He would be glad to pick remaining 2-3 mil and Kings could claim improvement at one of the positions.
Why do you think we brought in Shaq!?!?
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
If KJ AND VIVEK could fight off Balmer and make the Kings stay can we assume he can convince Lebron to play for the Kings next year... like discussed during Lebron's visit to sac last season? Should be a cake walk in comparison, right? =D
There you go. I HATE LBJ, but I would love to see this for one reason and one reason only - to see how the naysayers would find a way to say it was all KJ and Vivek or PDA had absolutely nothing to do with it.

:)