Not sure if you're replying to my post or not. But if so, nowhere did I say that Kobe was a bad defender. I'm still referring to the thread topic, as in, I don't think Kobe deserves to be on the All-defensive team when players like Battier and even his own teammate Artest are left off it.
This is the kind of award that is sort of predetermined, based primarily off of a player's name recognition and reputation in the NBA. It's not conclusive by any means, so getting worked up over it is kind of pointless. There are probably better defenders at the position than Kobe, and we all know that, regardless of the All NBA awards. It's totally moot.
I'm upset because I'm put in a position where I have to defend Kobe against people who state/insinuate that he's NOT a good defender 'because Phil Jackson hid him on Rondo'. The fact of the matter is that Rondo's penetration is the key to Boston's offense; it's no longer Paul Pierce or Kevin Garnett or anyone else that is the focal point. It's all about Rondo getting into the lane, so based on the fact that Artest/Pierce is the best matchup for the Lakers (and is part of the reason the Lakers wanted Artest in the first place) and that Derek Fisher can't stay in front of Rondo, it makes sense for Kobe to be the man there.
And while he isn't playing up in your grill defense on Rondo, Rondo's offense hasn't been all that effective when Kobe is in front of him. And that shuts down the entire Boston attack.