I sorta agree with the Margo Dydek comments, even though I don't "root against" her. But I really don't know why, despite her obvious size advantage, she isn't --- pardon the pun --- a "bigger" factor in any game she plays. Sure, she gets those blocked shots. But every time I see her on TV, she moves sluggishly, like she's in slow motion. She gets outhustled by smaller players. I realize that she's had back problems during this season. But at her age, 34 or 35 next year, I doubt her playing style will change.
Does anyone still remember Margo getting balls stolen and passes picked by Ticha and Yo during the 2005 WNBA Finals? I'm starting to think that Margo's play (or lack of same) is the biggest reason why the CT Sun lost to the Monarchs in '05.
Does anyone has an explanation why she is one of the more passive (maybe THE most passive) player in the league? Is it because she's so accustomed to European league play, where it's probably not as fast-paced as the WNBA is? Anyone has possible theories?
IMHO, the only reason why Dydek is still in the WNBA is because she is 7' 2". If she was 6' 2", I highly doubt she would be playing for any WNBA team. If she's not back in 2008, I would not miss her at all. In fact, good riddance!
If there was a player that I "root against"...there's always Lisa Leslie! (Even though she didn't play this past season.)