Maloofs Carls Jr Commercial

#4
The fact that the Maloofs have money and that seems to be the central issue for most people reinforces the small minded mentality that is sinking this whole effort.
 
#5
If they didn't have money, they wouldn't own an NBA team. But I wish they hadn't done this right now. I do think it just gives the opposition more fodder.
 
#9
One more thing... A fact came out about Orlando's arena negotiations that dirties their entire effort. The Magic paid a local radio talk show host $200,000 to not object to their arena plan (despite widespread oppostion in that area).

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...0,572842.story?page=1&coll=orl-home-headlines

It's interesting to read their comments section. This one article has drawn HUNDREDS of comments, and the comments themselves really sound like they could be coming from Sacramento.

I think this is a scandal. It could end up putting Orlando's arena efforts all the way back to square one.

And that radio host? He really should be fired. I'd fire him. First I'd make him return the money, then I'd let him go. He actually DID violate laws because he didn't disclose the money or where he got it. Oops.
 
#10
Isn't the Bee's recommended NO vote on Q&R more important than this?
Good question. Sadly, I think far more voters will see the commercial than read the Bee's opinion on anything to do with the elections. It seems like a lot of folks vote on the superficial description of something than any real substance or research into an issue.
 

Warhawk

Give blood and save a life!
Staff member
#11
One more thing... A fact came out about Orlando's arena negotiations that dirties their entire effort. The Magic paid a local radio talk show host $200,000 to not object to their arena plan (despite widespread oppostion in that area).

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...0,572842.story?page=1&coll=orl-home-headlines

It's interesting to read their comments section. This one article has drawn HUNDREDS of comments, and the comments themselves really sound like they could be coming from Sacramento.

I think this is a scandal. It could end up putting Orlando's arena efforts all the way back to square one.

And that radio host? He really should be fired. I'd fire him. First I'd make him return the money, then I'd let him go. He actually DID violate laws because he didn't disclose the money or where he got it. Oops.
Already posted in the Orlando thread:

http://www.kingsfans.com/forums/showpost.php?p=381106&postcount=4
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#12
Back to the commercial:

Having seen it, my main objection is the timing. Otherwise, it's not really bad - in fact, I'm just grateful they're wearing more clothes than Paris Hilton did in her Burger King offering.

;)
 
#13
I think the ad brings them down from serious negotiators to playboys. Which we were beginning to suspect anyway. Total loss of credibility, IMHO.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#14
That was one of the concerns I had, but it doesn't come off that way at all. They are Las Vegas millionaires. That's a given. They are prone to going out and having a good time. I think anyone who knows the Maloofs - or at least their public persona - is going to find it in keeping with their established image.

Brings them down from serious negotiators to playboys? Loss of credibility? I don't think so, but I do think the "No" contingency is going to have fun trying to make it seem that way.

If we weren't in the middle of a highly contested ballot proposal, I'd have no problem with it whatsoever. And I was one of the ones who really thought it was a bad idea. Now, as I say, my only objection is to the timing, not the content.
 
#16
That was one of the concerns I had, but it doesn't come off that way at all. They are Las Vegas millionaires. That's a given. They are prone to going out and having a good time. I think anyone who knows the Maloofs - or at least their public persona - is going to find it in keeping with their established image.

Brings them down from serious negotiators to playboys? Loss of credibility? I don't think so, but I do think the "No" contingency is going to have fun trying to make it seem that way.

If we weren't in the middle of a highly contested ballot proposal, I'd have no problem with it whatsoever. And I was one of the ones who really thought it was a bad idea. Now, as I say, my only objection is to the timing, not the content.
indeed. but as i'm sure you know, perception is everything...and this silly commercial is just more ammunition for the opposition. like you said, it was more the timing than the content that proves questionable, and, in short, its not helping the maloofs cause.
 
#17
"Net Worth: $1 Billion" ... Q&R is dead.
So the current proposed cost of an arena is over half their total wealth and the vast majority of that wealth is invested in business assets, including the Kings franchise. Its not available in the form of cash. They'd have to borrow a heckuva a lot to build it on their own and no lender would do it, because the cash flow sucks and will hardly support any debt payment.

That's similar to saying your house is worth $300,000, so you can afford to buy a a yacht for $175,000. Of course, you'd have to borrow and of course, if your cash flow sucked, you couldn't make the monthly payments. No lender would touch the deal. Well, except for the guys that will give you cement shoes if you don't pay up. ;)
 
#18
So the current proposed cost of an arena is over half their total wealth and the vast majority of that wealth is invested in business assets, including the Kings franchise. Its not available in the form of cash. They'd have to borrow a heckuva a lot to build it on their own and no lender would do it, because the cash flow sucks and will hardly support any debt payment.

That's similar to saying your house is worth $300,000, so you can afford to buy a a yacht for $175,000. Of course, you'd have to borrow and of course, if your cash flow sucked, you couldn't make the monthly payments. No lender would touch the deal. Well, except for the guys that will give you cement shoes if you don't pay up. ;)
Reality and facts left the arena debate long ago. Now it's all emotion and perception passing for knowledge. I don't blame the voters, they didn't really get anything from the pro-arena camp. So the void was filled with what was left over.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#19
Back to the commercial - Joe sat with Grant and Jerry during the first quarter and was very proud of the commercial. I even quoted some of his comments in the PBP thread.

He honestly didn't get it. He didn't understand that making a commercial that touts how rich you are isn't the thing to be doing when you're trying to get voters to approve a tax increase that will, in their minds, build your team a new arena.

He said at last twice, "The people of Sacramento have a great sense of humor. They'll get it."

He really doesn't get it.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#21
The primary problem is the "Net worth: $1 billion" and the timing, BMiller52. The nay-sayers have already starting chiming in on it.

It may not matter, however. I think the nails are pretty much in the Q & R coffin already, barring some miraculous announcement by the city/county and the Maloofs that could turn it around.
 
#22
It kind of surprises me. These guys are smart businessmen and I do believe they are successful, because they do try hard to please the customer. I don't get how they could be so clueless. Not that I think its right for people to hate them, just because they are rich.

I don't want them to pretend to be something they aren't, but they really need to find a way to tap into this community at a deeper level. I don't think they're bad guys at all. Actually, I think they are pretty good guys, but they definitely need a better PR person here in Sacramento.
 
#23
I don't care about the ad, I could care less how much money they have but I do have a problem with this ad. This is yet another thing that gives the apperance that they are trying to sabotage this measure.
 
#24
Personally I have detested Carls' Juniors ads for a long time - as far as that goes this one was not bad at all. But I think it did nothing to assist their image w/those who are against them & against Q&R. I agree they need a new PR rep
 
#25
All along the Maloofs wanted the voters to decide on a new arena. While there is a vote next month, it is not what anyone would consider a yes or no on a new arena. Instead it's now a vote on how this process has turned into a disaster. It will be about voters expessing their frustration over how this has unfolded. If the Maloofs and the NBA can be satisfied that they did their best to get a deal done, they are either delusional or frauds.
 
#26
Maybe the Maloofs made the commercial to pee off everyone in town. They are going through the song and dance to make it look like they want to stay in Sacramento. But, they dont want to be here and well they have offers from bigger and better towns who are willing and able to put the Kings on some Corporate Welfare.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#27
Yeah, I'm sure that's it. The Maloofs made a Carl's Jr. commercial as part of some huge plot to use subterfuge and deceit to sneak out of town.

Good grief.

:rolleyes:
 
#29
So the current proposed cost of an arena is over half their total wealth and the vast majority of that wealth is invested in business assets, including the Kings franchise. Its not available in the form of cash. They'd have to borrow a heckuva a lot to build it on their own and no lender would do it, because the cash flow sucks and will hardly support any debt payment.

That's similar to saying your house is worth $300,000, so you can afford to buy a a yacht for $175,000. Of course, you'd have to borrow and of course, if your cash flow sucked, you couldn't make the monthly payments. No lender would touch the deal. Well, except for the guys that will give you cement shoes if you don't pay up. ;)
:)

It's like me telling my less fortunate friends and family that I'm worth $300,000, and then asking to them to chip in to buy a $175,000 yacht, and rent it to me.
 

Warhawk

Give blood and save a life!
Staff member
#30
:)

It's like me telling my less fortunate friends and family that I'm worth $300,000, and then asking to them to chip in to buy a $175,000 yacht, and rent it to me.
Not really - you'd "rent" it for 30 years and only make money if you could pay all the staff their very high salaries and make repairs, etc, if you can hold enough events on the yacht and get people to visit it.

Well, you'd also have to mention that you have friends in other cities with yachts already in the harbor waiting for you to use theirs instead if your best friends don't want to "chip in".