Once more I don't like the fact that he just had a quick mention that he is the one to blame as well (for a couple of seconds only) and then just blaming the players non stop. How about his rotation, all those quick subs after quick subs after quick subs despite the team doing "ok" in the start of the game even though there were those turnovers? Couldn't he be so frustrated during the game and not after it ended during those timeouts? Like I wrote earlier he looked "chill" and he has been looking chill all season long unlike his first season that he was "living" the game and was communicating with the players all 48 minutes long in offense and defense.
I agree with Mike's assessment. That's one of his strengths.
The Kings were not locked in and disrespected the game by not respecting their opponents. The Blazers were very shaky early on and with our lackadaisical play, we let them come into their own. A good team would have smelled blood and stomped them. Unfortunately, there's no leader in this team that drives and holds people accountable on the floor. The only guy who brings it every game is Sabonis. Fox's focus goes on and off. Not exactly leadership material where you have to be consistent everyday. We just have to work around it at this point.
Mike took that leadership role in 2022-23 and provided structure and direction to help the team succeed. But from 2023-24, Mike went away from the "teacher/leader" role into a veteran playoff coach role who barks at people and acts irrationally when players fail. The quick yanking of players didn't allow our bench to grow any chemistry. Players are more afraid to make mistakes and that stifles creativity and makes them tentative. Rome isn't built in a day and chemistry isn't automatic, you need to water it everyday and grow it. Acting like the players should know better when the rotations are inconsistent isn't really fair. He needs to simplify actions, have consistent rotations and avoid introducing more
variability in the system. He needs to emphasize what works from one game and carry it over to the next. It looks like we're starting from scratch every game and try to create something. How do you improve if we don't learn the lessons and advance the baseline? Not starting Keon is a prime example where we didn't carry forward our lessons from last year.
Mike's main job is to make the player's job easy. Has he provided them with a system that plays to their strengths? Do we have a map of the preferred spots on the floor for every player? Do we have defined
set plays to get them open at their spots? This will help avoid players stepping on each other's toes and get them to their best spots. We will avoid the wasted helter-skelter movements that are done without purpose. If the players have no idea about when & where they would get a shot, they're going to do more mental processing and their efficiency craters (e.g. three-point percentage). This is especially true for role players. Often our movement without purpose does more to hinder our offense than the opponent's defense.
Mike's "in-game" adjustments are his weakness. Instead of a tweak to address a hole, there's often wholesale changes to the scheme or personnel on the floor. I don't want him searching for some combination that would work. That's homework that he should have done in practice. How can we expect a random combination of players to execute when we're under pressure? We just didn't have a proper thoughtful counter to the pressure defense of the Blazers. This is the exact same thing that the Pelicans used against us and we just shrug saying that we don't have players with length and do no meaningful changes. Similarly, on defense, we had no counter to the drive-and-kick game of the Blazers. Instead of moving up to put more pressure on their ball handlers, we let them get speed and it just opened up the floor for them. It's no surprise that their threes started falling.
Mike needs help on both offense and defense. Losing Jordi certainly did not help. The faster he accepts his shortcomings, the faster we can get better. Monte has work to do too. He addressed our need for a second "go-to" player but he never got the defensive frontcourt help or length that we lack.
Despite all the gloom and doom, I still believe this team has talent to be a playoff team. We need some tweaks and a swift kick in the pants.