The basic problem regarding the referees is that if the team's play puts the team in the position of being vulnerable to the ref's calls then it is reasonable to expect being at their mercy.
On the other hand, if the team is up 10 to 20 points (as it should have been at the end of the Suns game) then poor calls by the refs will have no influence in the outcome.
The Kings need to discover a strategy for maintaining leads that make the refs moot. There have been many good recommendations by knowledgeable folks on this forum. However, the Kings coaching staff doesn't seem to read the forum or, if they do, the suggestions are not taken seriously. Losing leads so consistently should be a major staff concern and ripe for modifications in strategies.
Yep I don't disagree. I was not doing the deep dive in the L2M report to justify why we lost last night. The last 2-min report is just a mockery of the sports, simply by showing how ill-equipped the league is to make the right calls, how helpless it can be for someone fast af like Fox to get fouled and was seen by any particular ref who happened to be able to follow and plant him/herself in a good spot to see it, and how little to no indication that the league intends to make changes according to it.
And I'm not saying Fox himself is the only case losing by being too fast, I'm accusing EVERY player who is/was at least as fast as Fox throughout the history of the league would've had a higher chance of getting an unfair whistle for their whole career.
In every other aspect of our lives, if something is supposed to "be policed" but the subject committing the act appears too fast to be policed, we usually employ the help of a machine. Meanwhile in the NBA, it's so archaic, that they are still "managing" refs having egos and acting according to it.
It's not about how soon the league will fix certain things, it's about how much all that involved can tolerate with what it is.