This offense could be more dynamic by not relying on the three so much, and not relying on isos so much and particularly Fox or Monk to create. If we were a real offense, a la Carill or Adelman, we would be able to create buckets as a team even when we go cold shooting the three.
This is absolutely not a controversial take but you all are so hyper emotional that you get so ding offended when anyone tells you the truth.
Our offense is at most two dimensional: threes and iso. It's a paper tiger propped up by the the current league fads/rules.
We pass more than anyone in the league at 310.8 per game. The next closest are the Raptors at 304.2 per game.
We have 2 of the most unselfish stars in basketball and one of the best offensive maestros in Domas in basketball.
We very rarely just clear out and let Fox/Monk go ISO. Of course there's situations that call for that, but we're also one of the lowest frequency ISO teams in the NBA. (26th in NBA).
In contrast:
Transition: 7th
Spot up: 12th
DHO: 1st (over 3.5% higher than the next closest team)
Cut: 4th
Off-Screen (so off-ball screen?): 29th
PnR Ball Handler: 30th
PnR Roll man: 27th
Post-up: 18th
ISO: 26th
You are right, we do shoot a lot of 3s. 4th highest rate in the NBA, 13th in 3pt % at 37%. Although the difference between us and 1st is 2.3%, so not a super wide delta there. I would add we're 7th in eFG%, as well, only behind Indy, Milwauke, OKC, LAC, PHX and Bos. All of which people very much consider elite offenses.
So I'll ask again, what's not dynamic here? This looks like a Domas centric offense where we're working DHO, finding cutters, finding shooters, getting out in transition. Us not being a PnR team does make sense because Fox isn't the best PnR passer and Domas isn't really a lob threat. Although I would like to see more of it, just to get Domas the ball while he's moving for some easier looks. Anecdotally, he seems to really have a lot of success in that playtype. Basically this EXACTLY proves how dynamic our offense is, since we don't just rely on a single play-type or rely on one guy to go create in ISO situations.
Or in other words, the total opposite to whatever it is you're trying to argue.