Squeaky clean Indy Colts cheaters too?

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#1
The "Good" team in all the "good vs. evil" storylines ran leading up to the Pats/Colts game may not be so squeaky clean. Check this out:
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d803e4990

Forward to the 2:22 mark and check out the audio - the crowd noise appears to skip like a broken cd while the rest of the audio is intact. Could Indy be piping in the crowd noise?

Those who watched the game may have recalled the announcers discussing the Indy crowd, and how most crowds eventually die down but Indy is different. They were talking about how intelligent the crowd was because they were always quiet when Peyton was behind center but so loud and raucous when the Colts were on D and this resulted in numerous false starts for the opposing offense.

And apparently they've been accused of similar shenanigans in the past:
http://kdka.com/topstories/Ed.Bouchette.Colts.2.380404.html

As a Pats fan who had to endure a week of ridiculous G vs E media coverage it would be quite funny to see the Colts get their comeuppance on this one.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#6
Crowd noise is sorta like having a snow plow for home field advantage...
;)
Except that piping in crowd noise when the play clock is running and the visitor is on offense is in direct violation of NFL rules.

I'm honestly not sure the rules on snow plows.
 
#7
That there may even now BE snow plow rules is thanks to shenanigans in Foxboro years ago.

So you can pipe in crowd noise any other time but when the play clock in running and the visitor is on offense? Why?
 
#9
They should have piped some noise in on the last Patriots possession where they scored that touch down if they were gonna do it, geezus. Or piped it in before Manning lost that ball on their last drive to keep him from doing that. Those audio people should be fired. ;)
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#10
Supposedly CBS is taking responsibility for the skipping saying it was their feedback. I'm not sure it entirely clears the Colts since this allegation has been made before. Supposedly the Redskins and Seahawks may also be guilty of doing it.

The rules about piping in or artificially boosting the crowd noise seem pretty self explanatory - the crowd can prevent the QB from receiving the play properly and loud crowds also frequently lead to more false start penalties. What you may not know is that the rules extend far beyond artificial noise. Teams are actually prohibited from displaying any crowd cues to induce cheering while the visitor is on the clock - scoreboard animations, cheerleaders, mascots - all are off limits.
 
#11
And apparently they've been accused of similar shenanigans in the past:
http://kdka.com/topstories/Ed.Bouchette.Colts.2.380404.html

As a Pats fan who had to endure a week of ridiculous G vs E media coverage it would be quite funny to see the Colts get their comeuppance on this one.
My Colts have been accused of this (along with a few other teams, most notably, the Seahawks,) several times over the past few seasons. There have been investigations into the matter everytime it's come up, and there is no proof that they have artificially enhanced the crowd noise in the stadium. So, as of right now, those allegations are baseless and unfounded.

What they have done that has contributed to the effect of the crowd noise is sent out memos and advertisements to game attendees to make sure not to disrupt the Colts offense, but to be as loud as possible when the other team has the ball. And it has led to even more home-field advantage for the Colts; they went 8-0 last season at home, 10-0 including the playoffs.

Patriot fans crack me up when they try to trivialize what their team was caught doing by accusing other teams of similar offenses. First, it was "every team in the NFL videotapes their opponents, that's football", and then when that didn't hold water, it turned into "the Colts pump artificial noise into the dome when the other team has the ball". Well, it's been investigated, and nothing has come of those investigations. The Patriots are the ones who will stop at nothing to gain the edge over their opponents.

I have lost respect for the Patriots this season, though I still believe they are a great team with a great QB and a great coach. I would have voted for Tom Brady to win the MVP last season, over LT. But they show no respect for the integrity of the game, first by cheating, secondly by running up the score on their opponents, third by their head coach showing no dignity or grace even in victory, and much less in defeat (going back to the "interview" with Solomon Wilcots after the AFC Championship Game last year), and the list goes on and on. They have put together a formidable team that will have to be reckoned with for several seasons. But they are not handling themselves in a way that begets respect, and it's trickling down to their fans. I tip my hat to them for the way they came back and won that game yesterday, but I don't respect them as a superior team, and I don't hold them in high regard anymore.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#12
Patriot fans crack me up when they try to trivialize what their team was caught doing by accusing other teams of similar offenses. First, it was "every team in the NFL videotapes their opponents, that's football", and then when that didn't hold water, it turned into "the Colts pump artificial noise into the dome when the other team has the ball". Well, it's been investigated, and nothing has come of those investigations. The Patriots are the ones who will stop at nothing to gain the edge over their opponents.
The only rule the Pats violated is where they taped their opponents. Taping the opponents is not illegal, doing it from the sidelines is. They got busted, they are paying the price, but lets not act like this is some mega-advantage that they've been exploiting for years. And it shouldn't have any effect on the run they are having this season which is nothing short of amazing.

As for BB's gruff personality, that's just him. That doesn't mean he is a sore winner or loser, he's just not mr. smiley happy. Why is that an issue?

The running up the score issue is total nonsense as well. I'm not going to defend them game by game, I'll just say the Colts have done it in the past. They had a 4 game stretch of blowouts when he was competing for the TD record. Where was the outrage over what Detroit did to Denver yesterday, or any of the other blowout games? St. Peyton Manning even stars in a commercial where he tells the viewer that they should be watching another game because the Colts game is a blowout, then he audibles a touchdown pass!

In any event, I believe every team in the NFL does whatever is necessary to gain a competitive advantage on the field. There are no Saints in the league other than the ones that play in New Orleans.
 
#13
The only rule the Pats violated is where they taped their opponents. Taping the opponents is not illegal, doing it from the sidelines is. They got busted, they are paying the price, but lets not act like this is some mega-advantage that they've been exploiting for years. And it shouldn't have any effect on the run they are having this season which is nothing short of amazing.
If you know what defense the other team is running, isn't that an advantage? Do you really think that going in at half-time and studying the other teams defensive signal-calling doesn't give you the upper hand offensively?

What they did was a big enough violation for the National Football League to thrown down a $750,000 fine and snatch away first day draft picks. And the effect it has on their play this season is that, by using those defensive signals to win games and Super Bowls, they have attracted big name free agents that want to play for a chance to win a ring (see: Randy Moss, Adalius Thomas, Wes Welker, Junior Seau).

As for BB's gruff personality, that's just him. That doesn't mean he is a sore winner or loser, he's just not mr. smiley happy. Why is that an issue?
He's shown an extreme lack of class over the past couple of seasons (see: shoving photographer after beating the Jets in last year's season-finale, blowing Solomon Wilcots off after the AFC Championship), and to a much lesser extent, so has Tom Brady (see: post-game interview, Nov 8, 2005). The SpyGate situation is a further testament to his lack of sportsmanship.

The running up the score issue is total nonsense as well. I'm not going to defend them game by game, I'll just say the Colts have done it in the past. They had a 4 game stretch of blowouts when he was competing for the TD record. Where was the outrage over what Detroit did to Denver yesterday, or any of the other blowout games? St. Peyton Manning even stars in a commercial where he tells the viewer that they should be watching another game because the Colts game is a blowout, then he audibles a touchdown pass!
There's nothing wrong with a blowout. There's something wrong with throwing and running for touchdowns on fourth down in the fourth quarter of a 40 point game. The Patriots ran up the score on the Dolphins and they ran up the score on the Redskins.

The Colts did no such thing in the 2004 season. In fact, the Colts would routinely slow their offense down late in games when they were up big. Jumping out to big leads in the first half, then protecting that lead in the second half is completely different from pouring salt on an open wound against a team that clearly has no chance of winning the game. The Colts did the former; the Patriots did the latter.

And who cares what happens in a commercial?

In any event, I believe every team in the NFL does whatever is necessary to gain a competitive advantage on the field. There are no Saints in the league other than the ones that play in New Orleans.
Within the rules, definitely. But I don't believe that every team in the NFL videotapes other teams defensive signals. I don't believe any teams are artificially enhancing their crowd noise during home games. I don't believe that the Patriots should just be given a pass, even though they've been caught cheating. And the above comment just shows how Patriot fans attempt to trivialize the wrong actions of their team. It's not a minor deal. It's a significant offense, and the NFL rightly treated it as such. There's no basis to the Patriots claims that the Colts pump noise through the sound system, and that claim has been investigated on several occasions. The Patriots have been caught cheating, and now they are trying to "prove" that everyone cheats. I disagree.
 
Last edited:

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#14
If you know what defense the other team is running, isn't that an advantage? Do you really think that going in at half-time and studying the other teams defensive signal-calling doesn't give you the upper hand offensively?
As I said, they were caught the first game this season, therefore everything else this season has been done on the level. If teams don't change their signals, that's their problem. And again, the only rule violated is WHERE they taped, not taping in general. Nobody punished the Dolphins last year when they admitted they had purchased tapes of the Patriots and then won in a rout.

What they did was a big enough violation for the National Football League to thrown down a $750,000 fine and snatch away first day draft picks. And the effect it has on their play this season is that, by using those defensive signals to win games and Super Bowls, they have attracted big name free agents that want to play for a chance to win a ring (see: Randy Moss, Adalius Thomas, Wes Welker, Junior Seau).
This is grasping at straws. They've been clean for 8/9 games this season but they're still dirty because taping opponents from the sidelines is the ONLY reason they signed free agents? How about responsible management of the salary cap over the last few seasons that put them in the position to make these moves when they needed to?

He's shown an extreme lack of class over the past couple of seasons (see: shoving photographer after beating the Jets in last year's season-finale, blowing Solomon Wilcots off after the AFC Championship), and to a much lesser extent, so has Tom Brady (see: post-game interview, Nov 8, 2005). The SpyGate situation is a further testament to his lack of sportsmanship.
You don't like him, that's fine. Most of the coaches and other people involved in the "classless" incidents have said that's Bill and they have no problem with it. Sorry he offends you.

There's nothing wrong with a blowout. There's something wrong with throwing and running for touchdowns on fourth down in the fourth quarter of a 40 point game. The Patriots ran up the score on the Dolphins and they ran up the score on the Redskins.
In the Dolphins game they put the backups in to start the 4th quarter and promptly gave up an interception for a score. Do you really think they should have to play with their backups for the entire 4th quarter and risk similar results? The Redskins game was a blowout one way or the other. It was 38-0 after the 3rd quarter. Brady played one series and the backup quarterback was in for the final TD.

The Colts did no such thing in the 2004 season. In fact, the Colts would routinely slow their offense down late in games when they were up big. Jumping out to big leads in the first half, then protecting that lead in the second half is completely different from pouring salt on an open wound against a team that clearly has no chance of winning the game. The Colts did the former; the Patriots did the latter.
You see it how you want to see it.

And who cares what happens in a commercial?
Because unlike a game situation where you play what is given to you the commercial is scripted. And so Peyton could say, "Hey, I'd never run up the score like this, I won't do the ad." But I doubt he'd take that position, its entirely fan and media generated. Very few players have taken a position on this running up the score matter and the majority that have have indicated they would run the plays the coach told them to.

Within the rules, definitely. But I don't believe that every team in the NFL videotapes other teams defensive signals. I don't believe any teams are artificially enhancing their crowd noise during home games. I don't believe that the Patriots should just be given a pass, even though they've been caught cheating. And the above comment just shows how Patriot fans attempt to trivialize the wrong actions of their team. It's not a minor deal. It's a significant offense, and the NFL rightly treated it as such. There's no basis to the Patriots claims that the Colts pump noise through the sound system, and that claim has been investigated on several occasions. The Patriots have been caught cheating, and now they are trying to "prove" that everyone cheats. I disagree.
You see it how you want to see it. Frankly, most people are just jealous of what the Pats have put together. I don't think we'll ever agree so feel free to take the last word from here.
 
#15
As I said, they were caught the first game this season, therefore everything else this season has been done on the level. If teams don't change their signals, that's their problem. And again, the only rule violated is WHERE they taped, not taping in general. Nobody punished the Dolphins last year when they admitted they had purchased tapes of the Patriots and then won in a rout.
Your point is irrelevant. It is illegal to tape defensive signals. That's the reason the Patriots were held accountable. There's no two ways about it.

This is grasping at straws. They've been clean for 8/9 games this season but they're still dirty because taping opponents from the sidelines is the ONLY reason they signed free agents? How about responsible management of the salary cap over the last few seasons that put them in the position to make these moves when they needed to?
No, it's not grasping at straws at all. I didn't say that it's the only reason they've signed free agents. I said that it has helped them sign free agents. I don't think anything else needs to be said, because that's true.

And, by the way, that one game is enough. The whole point is that they cheated, and Belichick was obviously the one who was behind the whole thing. And there's no doubt is most football fans minds that the Patriots have taped during many games in the past.

You don't like him, that's fine. Most of the coaches and other people involved in the "classless" incidents have said that's Bill and they have no problem with it. Sorry he offends you.
I didn't say anything about whether I like him or not. I said he's showing himself to be classless. And unlike Belichick, most other coaches in the NFL have enough respect for their peers, deserved or not, to avoid throwing other coaches under the bus, even though it's widely known that Belichick is a jerk.

In the Dolphins game they put the backups in to start the 4th quarter and promptly gave up an interception for a score. Do you really think they should have to play with their backups for the entire 4th quarter and risk similar results? The Redskins game was a blowout one way or the other. It was 38-0 after the 3rd quarter. Brady played one series and the backup quarterback was in for the final TD.
Against the Dolphins, it wasn't putting Brady back in. It was putting him back in and throwing the ball four times for 59 yards and a[nother] touchdown. Against the Redskins, it was throwing the ball on fourth down for touchdowns and the like. They ran the score up against both teams, no doubt about it.

You see it how you want to see it.
:confused:

Do you realize that you just defended the Patriots late-game scoring, and then turn around and accuse me of being biased? I gave specific examples of how the Colts did NOT rub it in when they had the chance to. I can give more. The whole point is that, even if the Colts did run the score up on opponents in 2004 (which they didn't; I watched almost every game), it doesn't excuse the Patriots actions against the Dolphins and Redskins.


Because unlike a game situation where you play what is given to you the commercial is scripted. And so Peyton could say, "Hey, I'd never run up the score like this, I won't do the ad." But I doubt he'd take that position, its entirely fan and media generated. Very few players have taken a position on this running up the score matter and the majority that have have indicated they would run the plays the coach told them to.
I don't understand. Peyton has a contract with DirecTV to do their commercials. He can breach his contract because a couple Patriot fans might think that he is advocating running up the score in a Sunday Ticket commercial, or he can just do the stupid commercial. I don't see any real correlation. Talk about grasping at straws.

You see it how you want to see it. Frankly, most people are just jealous of what the Pats have put together. I don't think we'll ever agree so feel free to take the last word from here.
Hell, I'm very jealous of what the Patriots have put together this season. They're having a great year. It doesn't have anything to do with how I'm losing respect for them as a great team, though. It doesn't change the fact that they got caught cheating red-handed, and it isn't a basis to levy false accusations against the Colts - again - in order to deflect some of the heat off of themselves. I don't have to sit up and proclaim the Colts the most classy and respectful organization in football in order for the Patriots to be under-handed and sleazy. The Patriots have given themselves that reputation with their unsportsmanlike late-game scores, their cheating scandal, and their head coach and star QB showing less than ideal amounts of respect for their colleagues and others associated with their events.

My whole point is that the Patriots have been caught cheating, and since then, their whole focus, fans included, has been to deflect as much attention as possible to other teams and players: "this team does this," "every team does that", etc. The Patriots have earned all the negative attention they are receiving right now, and that's why I now root against them every week. Like I said, I would have voted for Brady to win MVP last season; it's not just pure hatred for the Patriots due to being a Colts fan. I am just now losing the respect that I've had for them for several years, and it's due to the way they've been handling themselves over the past couple of seasons when they haven't been at the top of the League.

Yeah, we won't ever agree about this, but I'm not just being a Patriot-hater. I'm expressing what many fans and analysts have expressed about the Patriots over the past couple of seasons.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#18
Your point is irrelevant. It is illegal to tape defensive signals. That's the reason the Patriots were held accountable. There's no two ways about it.
I'm staying out of the rest, but this part is simply not true. It is illegal to tape anything from the sidelines. That's what the Pats did and got busted for. If they had somebody taping signals from the press box or the Goodyear blimp that's perfectly legal. But that doesn't make a good story so that part of it is routinely ignored in favor of what the Pats were taping.
 
#19
I'm staying out of the rest, but this part is simply not true. It is illegal to tape anything from the sidelines. That's what the Pats did and got busted for. If they had somebody taping signals from the press box or the Goodyear blimp that's perfectly legal. But that doesn't make a good story so that part of it is routinely ignored in favor of what the Pats were taping.
How does that change anything? They were caught taping signals, which is illegal. Who cares whether it's legal to tape the signals from the press box or the blimp? What they got caught doing is illegal, and that's the whole point. The very fact that we are discussing this furthers my point: Patriots fans try to trivialize their team's offense.

And, as a side point, I don't think your interpretation of the rule is correct. I will do some research on that, but that's not what I remember seeing. I may be wrong. But even if it is, it doesn't change the fact that the Patriots broke the rules.
 
#23
Except that piping in crowd noise when the play clock is running and the visitor is on offense is in direct violation of NFL rules.

I'm honestly not sure the rules on snow plows.
Just came across this on the Colts webpage:
"In reference to questions regarding the audio transmission of yesterday’s game, please refer to the following statement from the NFL: CBS has informed us that the unusual audio moment heard by fans during the Patriots-Colts game was the result of tape feedback in the CBS production truck and was isolated to the CBS broadcast. It was in no way related to any sound within the stadium and could not be heard in the stadium. We close with the following sentence: We trust this will put an end to the ridiculous and unfounded accusations that the Colts artificially enhanced crowd noise at the RCA Dome in any way."
I thought that italicized portion was key. Anyways, just thought I'd add that little bit. I'm still trying to find some info on the exact rule regarding videotaping signals. I guess this won't be too big of a deal after this season, as the competition committee will probably approve the use of a defensive radio system for calling in the plays.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#24
I can find quite a few articles that reference the rules for taping signals, it shouldn't be that hard unless you're looking for one that says its absolutely 100% illegal, because it isn't. Its also worth reviewing the NFL's official statement on the matter when announcing the penalties in which Goodell notes that the Patriots gained no on field advantage from the use of the camera.

As for the crowd noise in Indy, I don't think the matter is closed, just this one glitch which looked like a smoking gun. They've been accused of it in the past and there are reports an unnamed security guard admitted this week that they mic the crowd and replay it through the PA system. Quite frankly I found the last sentence in their press release to be key, innocent people don't usually protest so much. Where there's smoke, there's usually fire.
 
#25
Innocent people do and should protest too much when they're accused of something they didn't do and people ran with it like it was smoking gun. If the allegations had been founded I'm pretty darn sure the NFL would have looked into, in fact I thought the NFL had looked into it and that's where the statement came from.

For something that did not give the Pats a significant on field advantage, the penalty sure was substantial and unprecedented. If it had given them a significant advantage would Goodell have taken all their draft picks away and banned BB for life?

The "rule" as identified by a league spokesman. This seems 100% illegal to me, unless the argument was that the Pats could have used a blimp, cameras on a satellite or the moon, or seat 34 in section nosebleeds and it would have been completely cool with the league. Since that's not what they were found to have been doing...
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#26
Innocent people do and should protest too much when they're accused of something they didn't do and people ran with it like it was smoking gun. If the allegations had been founded I'm pretty darn sure the NFL would have looked into, in fact I thought the NFL had looked into it and that's where the statement came from.
The NFL looked into the audio hiccup and stopped looking into it when CBS took responsibility. I still would like to know why an RCA Dome security guard says otherwise:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/...lt=Am_Ddz.NNSCgZ7AwaYpkKixDubYF?urn=nfl,52696
 
#28
The ol' unidentified source referenced in "NFL Rumors"....I'm sure that may have played a role in the league not going any further with its investigation. So you really believe that Goodell would look the other way and let this go on even if something against his league's rules was taking place simply because CBS explained away an audio phenomenon the viewing audience heard. His credibility as tough guy commish gets shot to hell if he operates that capriciously. What's his motivation for looking the other way, if that's what you're accusing him of? If there is a smoking gun, he's first in the line of fire, not the Colts.
 
#29
The NFL looked into the audio hiccup and stopped looking into it when CBS took responsibility. I still would like to know why an RCA Dome security guard says otherwise:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/...lt=Am_Ddz.NNSCgZ7AwaYpkKixDubYF?urn=nfl,52696
Come on.

An unidentified security guard from the RCA Dome gives this information to a reporter in Boston?

:rolleyes:

If an unidentified security guard from Gilette Stadium gave information about the Patriots breaking the rules by video-taping signals from the sidelines, would you take that report seriously? I wouldn't, especially not from an Indianapolis news outlet.

As was mentioned, Goodell has established himself as a no-nonsense commissioner. If there's really smoke, he's going to do his best to find the fire. As it stands now, he evidently doesn't believe that there's really smoke. Again, the NFL has investigated several stadiums over the past few years after allegations that artificial crowd noise was being pumped through the PA system. They have investigated the Colts. They found nothing. So when CBS steps up and tells the NFL that the glitch was their fault, and when everyone involved says that the noise couldn't be heard in the dome, why isn't that enough? We've already looked into this before, and came up with nothing to suggest that anything wrong is happening.

The fact is that domes are built to enhance sound. So when the team takes step to educate their fans about when to make noise and when to be quiet, it stands to reason that the dome is going to be loud when the defense is on the field and quiet for the offense. Not to mention the fact that this was the heaviest promoted game since the Super Bowl, against an undefeated arch-rival, a close game throughout, and the defensive players were waving at the audience to make noise between every snap. I mean, it's going to be loud in there; that's the reason they built the building. The Colts, and every other NFL team that plays in a dome, have a built-in advantage. They don't need to enhance crowd noise, because it's already loud enough.

My whole point is that it's interesting (and becoming more and more ironic) that Patriots fans are so quick to try and drag other teams, specifically the Colts, through the mud at every possible opportunity. The title of the thread is a testament to that. The whole idea, it seems, is to take the spotlight off of SpyGate by uncovering a cheating scandal from another top team in the NFL. The "everybody does it" defense didn't work, so now we have to accuse other teams of cheating in order to justify what the Patriots did. But the fact of the matter is that the NFL investigated the Colts crowd noise the same way they investigated the Patriots, only they didn't find any violations at the RCA Dome, while they found the Patriots to be in the wrong. That's the bottom line, really.
 
#30
I can find quite a few articles that reference the rules for taping signals, it shouldn't be that hard unless you're looking for one that says its absolutely 100% illegal, because it isn't.


Do you have a link? I can't find an official release of the rule. All I keep finding is this:
"The rule is that no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches' booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game," the league said Monday in a statement from spokesman Greg Aiello. "Clubs have specifically been reminded in the past that the videotaping of an opponent's offensive or defensive signals on the sidelines is prohibited."​
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=271801
http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/09/21/patriots_wont_be_hit_harder/
http://www.nfl.com/news/story;jsess...0d5d80251b7e&template=with-video&confirm=true
http://news.zdnet.com/2010-9588_22-6210023.html

And again, I never said that video-taping is 100% illegal. I said it doesn't matter. What they did was illegal, and they knew it was when they did it.

Its also worth reviewing the NFL's official statement on the matter when announcing the penalties in which Goodell notes that the Patriots gained no on field advantage from the use of the camera.


Why would they take such a risk video-taping, especially against Mangini who knows what they would be up to, if they didn't gain any advantage? Maybe not in that game, or in that half, but there's a definite advantage to be gained, or else they wouldn't take the chance.
"This episode represents a calculated and deliberate attempt to avoid longstanding rules designed to encourage fair play and promote honest competition on the playing field." - Roger Goodell, in a letter to the New England Patriots​
http://www.nfl.com/news/story;jsess...0d5d80251b7e&template=with-video&confirm=true

As for the crowd noise in Indy, I don't think the matter is closed, just this one glitch which looked like a smoking gun. They've been accused of it in the past and there are reports an unnamed security guard admitted this week that they mic the crowd and replay it through the PA system. Quite frankly I found the last sentence in their press release to be key, innocent people don't usually protest so much. Where there's smoke, there's usually fire.
If you were being taken to trial for something you weren't guilty of, wouldn't you hire the best legal defense you possibly could, and then drive home every fact supporting your innocence that you possibly could? You wouldn't just walk away and ignore the charges.

Fact is, this allegation has been laid to rest several times in the past, and not just with the Colts. As I said, I don't think any team in the NFL pipes artificial noise through their sound system. It's completely unnecessary, and especially when you see the way the League came down on the Patriots and Belichick, why would you risk it? The RCA Dome is meant to maximize crowd noise. They don't need to enhance it. But it's not surprising that they would defend themselves.