[Rumor] Shams: Kings a team of interest in Ja Morant trade

Perry can talk all he wants until he's blue in the face, but this is the exact kind of move Vivek has made over and over and over and over again.

I don't even know what a favorable deal for us would look like here? He adds another year onto the LaVine contract. I guess if you want to clean Monk/Dennis into 1 asset, but it doesn't subtract any money. I think we'll be able to get a positive asset from DDR and if not, we can clean his contract this off-season.

Unless we're getting assets with Ja (Cam? Cedric Coward? Picks?), stay far far away
 
Perry can talk all he wants until he's blue in the face, but this is the exact kind of move Vivek has made over and over and over and over again.

I don't even know what a favorable deal for us would look like here? He adds another year onto the LaVine contract. I guess if you want to clean Monk/Dennis into 1 asset, but it doesn't subtract any money. I think we'll be able to get a positive asset from DDR and if not, we can clean his contract this off-season.

Unless we're getting assets with Ja (Cam? Cedric Coward? Picks?), stay far far away
A "favorable" deal would be Zach going their way, and a FRP coming back with Ja.
 
Jesus no. He wants Miami send him there. Or to the multiple other teams. Oh, maybe that's just agent or team leak to make it sounds like there's a market. We're not buyers this year.

Well, on the positive side, I do like Ja's chances of reviving his career in Sacramento a hell of a lot more than I would with him moving to Miami. Making a buy-low move on Morant certainly would be on-brand for a Sacramento franchise hell bent on being the worst defensive squad in the league for all of eternity. $42 million a year for a PG who is a career 31% three point shooter and could charitably be described as a below-average defender is a tough pill to swallow, whatever his other selling points. I guess .500 teams in Sacramento still sell tickets though so that seems to be the marching orders from ownership.
 
I'd be good with that. Add a year of the big contract for a FRP. Give Ja a chance to be C-Webb 2.0 and reinvent himself here.

My worry is the trade will look like LaVine+Carter+FRP for Ja.
That would be it from Perry for me if we did that.
 
This might be a Webber style trade. We aren't signing a Ja player. At some point this team will have to buy low. If he's injured, you could park him for the year, finish tanking, get a top 4 pick then start ramping up next year. You'd have to nail it though, he'd have to buy in, and return to 90% of form.
 
This would be better if we could turn Jaylen Wells into another pick (1st or 2nd).
Our family would be happy to hear that Jaylen got traded to Sacramento. My son knows him - they are not "close"; more casual friends / acquaintances. He was in my son's Cub Scout group and my son played against him in AAU, if I recall correctly. But we'd be happy to have him "home".

Not saying another pick wouldn't be good either, mind you.
 
A "favorable" deal would be Zach going their way, and a FRP coming back with Ja.

Is it though? It still just pushes back the inevitable and if there are betting odds on the Spurs getting a top 5 Kings pick in '31 I'm putting money down on that one for sure. 2 years to squander, 3 to get back to the starting line. Yep, we've seen a 16 year drought start the same basic way.
 
Our family would be happy to hear that Jaylen got traded to Sacramento. My son knows him - they are not "close"; more casual friends / acquaintances. He was in my son's Cub Scout group and my son played against him in AAU, if I recall correctly. But we'd be happy to have him "home".

Not saying another pick wouldn't be good either, mind you.
I get this. And I am not saying that Jaylen coming to Sacramento would be a bad thing. No, not at all.
At this point, though, I'd much rather stock up on draft picks whenever possible.
 
Last edited:
Is it though? It still just pushes back the inevitable and if there are betting odds on the Spurs getting a top 5 Kings pick in '31 I'm putting money down on that one for sure. 2 years to squander, 3 to get back to the starting line. Yep, we've seen a 16 year drought start the same basic way.
I'm not in favor of this, but just wanted to make sure you saw that WE are the ones getting a draft pick back because this is still centered around a draft rebuild.
 
This might be a Webber style trade. We aren't signing a Ja player. At some point this team will have to buy low. If he's injured, you could park him for the year, finish tanking, get a top 4 pick then start ramping up next year. You'd have to nail it though, he'd have to buy in, and return to 90% of form.

The issue is the Kings don't have a Geoff Petrie calling the rest of the shots. That Kings team was lightening and not anything to follow. We have to realize that by now. It worked for way more reasons than just buying low on CWebb. All the moves lined up financially, draft wise, etc and the chances of the Kings pulling that off now are pretty slim. The common sense thing is what it is. Teams fighting for top seeds in the draft while having the 3rd oldest roster and unfavorable contracts are just mindlessly gambling if they think it's a way out. Make this trade and it could work, but it tells me no, Mr. Plan doesn't actually have a plan at all. It's more Vivek and co. throwing darts at board looking for the get rich quick scheme.
 
Last edited:
I'm not in favor of this, but just wanted to make sure you saw that WE are the ones getting a draft pick back because this is still centered around a draft rebuild.

Yeah, and I don't think purely landing a draft pick is the way to anywhere unless you know where that pick lands. The clear way to do it is with cap space if a team wants picks. Not this. This would be a trade that clearly commands a win now approach and no doubt that would follow. The Kings want a great draft pick? Hold onto your own as tight as possible and do what needs to be done.
 
Yeah, and I don't think purely landing a draft pick is the way to anywhere unless you know where that pick lands. The clear way to do it is with cap space if a team wants picks. Not this. This would be a trade that clearly commands a win now approach and no doubt that would follow. The Kings want a great draft pick? Hold onto your own as tight as possible and do what needs to be done.
I don't view as win now we'd probably sit Ja for the remainder of the year. Then he just replaces Russ next year. By then maybe he rehabs and you flip him as an expiring.

Again I am by no means in favor of this but I don't see Ja on this team as a winning player any more than Fox was from 2017-2022.
 
I don't view as win now we'd probably sit Ja for the remainder of the year. Then he just replaces Russ next year. By then maybe he rehabs and you flip him as an expiring.

Again I am by no means in favor of this but I don't see Ja on this team as a winning player any more than Fox was from 2017-2022.

OK, but straight up, if the Kings are in the business of rehabbing value, BE WORRIED!! haha. Ain't gonna happen here. If a team is getting Morant you do so hoping a talent infusion pushes you up. Nothing more. Or at least that should be the goal. The Kings are masters at taking low cost stabs but it rarely has led them anywhere. It's officially time for them to put the pipe down. At least for a season or two.
 
OK, but straight up, if the Kings are in the business of rehabbing value, BE WORRIED!! haha. Ain't gonna happen here. If a team is getting Morant you do so hoping a talent infusion pushes you up. Nothing more. Or at least that should be the goal. The Kings are masters at taking low cost stabs but it rarely has led them anywhere. It's officially time for them to put the pipe down. At least for a season or two.
Take Ja out of the equation and say you were able to trade Zach for a bad contract with one more year on it and a 2028 Memphis FRP.

Now I know that isn't even on the table and Memphis wouldn't do it, but you're telling me we wouldn't be happy to flip Zach for a future first?
 
In a Hollinger article on the Athletic, which also credits Amick for input, the Kings interest was described as 'lukewarm'.

A quick canvas around the league indicated that some other potential trade partners also don’t quite add up as Morant destinations. Sacramento’s interest is lukewarm at best, according to a well-placed league source, with the Kings likely looking at a much deeper and longer rebuild than just throwing assets at a Morant deal. They seemingly only get mentioned here because of the “Vivek Ranadivé is crazy enough to do this” factor.

Sure that doesn't mean it's not possible and crazy seems right but along with everything else pushed out about the Kings rebuild - sounds less likely.
 
Back
Top