Refs suck

#1
The frickin' refs are taking the "this year is Pittsburgh's destiny" a bit far, don'cha think?

<< I have no particular reason to root for one team versus the other in this superbowl, so I hope I'm being objective. >>
 
#4
Then there is the fact that the first TD was taken away for a push off that wasn't a push off

Pathetic.

Team of destiny, indeed.
 
C

Coach

Guest
#6
I thought the officiating was quite good. (And I don't really care about either team.) Roethlisberger's touchdown was way too close to call. And the Darrell Jackson push off was obvious; he created space with the push -- and Seattle didn't even complain about the call. I also thought the reversal on the Hasselbeck fumble was absolutely correct. The only call the officials missed was when Jeremy Stevens fumbled in the first half but the refs called it an incomplete pass.

The Steelers won fair and square. Although Roethlisberger sure got jittery down the stretch. His interception was a horrible pass that could have cost Pittsburgh the game.

And, by the way, the Rolling Stones ROCKED.
 
#7
Yeah the refs decided this game. Personally I think Vegas had their hands in. All the lines were ont he side of Pittsburg. If someone took certain lines on Seatlle they stood to make a LOT of money. Every crucial call went the way of Pittsburg. The first Pitt touchdown was not a touchdown. His elbow broke the plane. The pit of his elbow where the nose of the ball was did not.

The first touchdown by seattle WAS a touchdown. He barely touched the guy and it happens ALL the time every week in the nfl. Take that into account and your score is 17-14 Seatlle wins.
 
#8
I didn't really care who won the game but was very glad to see Ward get MVP. I've been following him since college and it's great that he finally was recognised for his achievements. Congratulations Hines, you deserve it.:D Iy couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
This beats winning between the hedges.;)
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#9
The push off call was ticky-tack. You don't do that in the Super Bowl.

The Jerramy Stevens call was equally horrible. The guy had the ball, turned and took at least two steps. That's making a "football move" no matter how you look at it...

Those two equally poor calls cancel each other out IMHO.

I honestly think Roethlisberger did break the goal line plane with the ball initially so I would have agreed with that one.

All in all, although there were some questionable calls, this was Seattle's game to win. They pretty much had their way with the vaunted Steeler defense and simply didn't get the job done.

This was NOT a superbowl that will go down in history as one of the greats...
 
C

Coach

Guest
#10
On second thought, DocHolliday is right. There was a conspiracy and Vegas was involved. In fact, I'm positive it's all a part of the Maloofs' plan to move the Kings to Sin City. I'm pretty sure I saw the head referee at the Palms last weekend.
 
#12
I felt like I was watching the Kings in a certain WCF game as I watched the Seahawks get flat out screwed by the officials. The push off was a bad call for a super bowl and Big Ben's T.D. was flat out cheating. Did you notice the call on the field first was that he was down, then a T.D.? Then, under review, there was not enough evidence to overturn the play... screw-job, pure and simple. I think someone got to at least one of the refs, but who? Vegas? The NFL (they will certainly sell more Steelers championship merchandise than Seahawks). It is not surprising, but, yet again, the large market team gets all of the important calls... Lastly, it is sad to me that the Seahawks lost by 11, that is exactly the number of points that were taken from them by the crooked officials. (Ben's TD (7) and the Jackson TD that ended up being a FG (4)).
 
#13
the refs made some poor calls. i'm not sure about the roethlisberger touchdown (from the replay it seemed like the ball didn't break the plane)... but the holding call on the play when hasselback made a pass to the 2 was incorrect. and on the next play, hasselback threw an interception.
 
#14
VF21 said:
The push off call was ticky-tack. You don't do that in the Super Bowl.

The Jerramy Stevens call was equally horrible. The guy had the ball, turned and took at least two steps. That's making a "football move" no matter how you look at it...

Those two equally poor calls cancel each other out IMHO.
I disagree that the two plays cancel each other out. On the contrary, Seattle got no benefit. The Stevens fumble came on third down, after it was ruled incomplete the Hawks punted, and there was a touchback. If the play is ruled a fumble, the ball had rolled inside the 15. Chances are Pitt recovers it and makes some sort of return and ends up with the ball around the 20. So either way, the end result is Steeler ball around the 20 no matter the call. The Jackson "push off" resulted in 3 points instead of 7. So in my opinion the two don't cancel out, one was a bad call that hurt Seattle, the other was a bad call that hurt no one.

I agree that Big Ben's run probably can't be overturned- way too close of a call. I did think that the phantom holding call that took away a Hawks First and goal early in the fourth was also bad (especially since Matt threw a pick two plays later)...

All in all, I thought the officiating was lousy. However, while Seattle can cry about missed calls all night, the fact of the matter is that they shot themselves in the foot. They beat Pittsburgh up, down, and around the field most of the game on both sides of the ball and never capitalized.

I am a huge Seahawks fan, and agree VF, that this was no SUPER bowl. Both teams played pretty lousy and the officiating was bad. But as a Hawks fan, it is pretty tough to point the fingers at the zebras when your own team played so poorly.
 
#15
I don't particularly care for either team. The pushoff call seemed awfully small to me, and a couple of good 1st downs for the hawks were called back for borderline holding.

There was no obvious hooking though, things just didn't go the Seahawks way, and that happens.
 
#16
Refs were far from Super in this one
Kevin Hench / FOXSports.com

This is the space where I get to crow about the frightening precision of my Super Bowl prediction.

Where I get to remind everyone that I guaranteed the Steelers would win the title after they beat the Colts. That they were the only championship-caliber team among the final four. That they would dismantle the Broncos in Denver and waylay whomever the NFC sent at them.

This is the space where I get to wag a finger at my colleague Ian O'Connor, with whom I'd waged a dueling columns battle of opposing prognostication. He picked the Seahawks and made a very strong case for them.

This is the space where I get to say, I told ya so. But I won't. I can't.

I've never felt so empty being right. I feel dirty. I wish I'd been wrong. The Steelers did not deserve to win this game. They were not the better team. O'Connor was right. Seattle was the better team.

So, Paul Tagliabue, how does a team lose when it outgains an opponent by 57 yards, controls time of possession and wins the turnover battle?

Like a crazed CIA analyst running through the halls of Langley screaming into open offices about some impending calamity, I've been shrieking hysterically about the terrible officiating in the NFL and warning that some day the brutal calls were going to affect the outcome of the Super Bowl.

That some day was Sunday.

Every single questionable, marginal or outright bad call went against the Seahawks.

Their first three big plays were all wiped out by penalty calls. On their second drive, Darrell Jackson caught an 18-yard pass on 3rd-and-6 that would have given Seattle a first down at the 23. But Chris Gray was called for holding James Farrior. When Farrior pushed upfield, Gray did hook him with his right arm, and Farrior went down. When referee Bill Levy flagged Gray, it was a bad omen for the Seahawks. Instead of being on the edge of the red zone, they came away without any points.

On their third drive, the Seahawks looked to take a 7-0 lead when Jackson separated from Chris Hope in the end zone and Matt Hasselbeck delivered a perfect strike to his outside shoulder. The back judge looked uncertain —sound familiar, Patriots fans? — then finally jerked his flag out and called offensive pass interference to wipe out the touchdown. The replay showed receiver and defender hand-fighting with Jackson getting the slightest push into Hope's chest before turning to catch the ball. ABC's John Madden thought the call was dubious. FOX analyst and all-time great offensive lineman Brian Baldinger had no doubts, calling it "absolutely horrendous" on his FOXSports.com Super Bowl Instant Analysis. ESPN's Steve Young and Michael Irvin also had no uncertainty, dismissing the call as ticky-tack and insisting the Seahawks got robbed of a TD.

Then came a huge call on the first play of the second quarter. Peter Warrick ripped off a 33-yard punt return to give Seattle the ball at the Steelers 46. But Etric Pruitt was called for holding. How clear was it? Well, Madden thought the call was for Pruitt holding the gunner at the beginning of the play. It wasn't. The flag came in during the runback and it looked pretty minor. Another example of an official searching to make a call.

So despite totally dominating the first 20 minutes of the game, the Seahawks led only 3-0.

Then came Pittsbugh's first touchdown. Whether you think Roethlisberger broke the plane of the goal line seems to depend on which team you were rooting for. The odd part was the line judge seemed to have determined that Big Ben had come up short as he ran in from the sideline. Since Roethlisberger had been pushed back well short of the goal line I don't know what he could have seen as he got closer to the pile that would have made him change his mind. But up went the arms. Had Roethlisberger been ruled short of the plane, that call would no doubt have stood too. But you figure the Black and Gold would have pounded it in from the two-inch line on fourth down so there's not that much here for Seattle fans to complain about except for the continuing storyline that every single call was going the Steelers' way. And the worst was yet to come.

The Seahawks were on the verge of taking a 17-14 lead early in the fourth quarter when officiating disaster struck. Hasselbeck had drilled a pass down the seam to Jerramy Stevens to set up first-and-goal at the one when suddenly Levy appeared in the middle of the screen to call the play back on account of holding on Sean Locklear. No less a source than newly-minted Hall of Famer John Madden came right out and said it was a bad call. This penalty was beyond ticky-tack. Baldinger called it "another terrible call" and added that the Steelers were offsides on the play. It was yet another official searching for a call, desperate to throw his flag, yearning to impact the action. Why, why, oh, why? That's 14 points the officials simply took away from the Seahawks. Incredible.

After a sack, Hasselbeck threw a pick and then was penalized 15 yards for making the tackle. I'm not kidding. The same thing happened in the Indy-Pittsburgh game in the regular season. It's like the officials become so discombobulated during the change of possession that they just randomly start throwing flags. The call was that Hasselbeck had thrown an illegal block below the waist on the return. Never mind that Hasselbeck wasn't trying to block anybody and did, in fact, make the tackle. Just another terrible call that cannot be reviewed in Paul Tagliabue's NFL.

The Steelers took quick advantage of their enhanced field position and just like that it was 21-10 Pittsburgh when it should have been 17-14 Seattle.

But the stripes weren't done.

First, they blew a fumble call on the field — of course against Seattle — before overturning it after replay. Then, with the Steelers trying to run out the clock, Levy granted Roethlisberger a timeout, even though the play clock clearly read zero before the quarterback signaled for time. It ended up being the final bad call in Seattle's coffin.

As Madden and Al Michaels watched the replay they shared a laugh about a similar bad non-call in an earlier playoff game between the Bears and Panthers. This is what it has come to: Announcers comparing the bad calls happening before them to the bad calls from earlier rounds of the playoffs. Is this really what the NFL wants?

With Cris Collinsworth lobbying for pass interference to be eligible for review on Inside the NFL after New England got jobbed in Denver; Joey Porter inveighing against the league after the game in Indy; Young and Irvin railing at halftime of the Super Bowl; Baldinger being spot-on with his Instant Analysis critique of the officials; and Madden and Michaels wondering aloud about the officiating during the game ... is anybody in the league office listening?

Or can we pretty much count on next year's playoffs being dominated by the officials too?
Link
 
#17
Game's third team upstaged Steelers, Hawks

By Michael Smith
ESPN.com


DETROIT -- Three weeks ago, after the Steelers held on to upset Indianapolis, Joey Porter was unhappy about the overturning of Troy Polamalu's fourth-quarter interception that could have sealed the win much earlier. Believing that deep down the league preferred Peyton Manning and the Colts to win, Porter publicly criticized the game officials, asking them not to "take the game from us."

Well, the Steelers can call it even now, as the officials who performed well enough throughout the season to earn the privilege of working Super Bowl XL performed Sunday as though they were trying to make it up to the Steelers by giving them the game -- not just any game, but the biggest game. And, yes, this time the other guys, the Seahawks, cried conspiracy, only not quite as loudly as Porter.

"You know, that's what happens when the world is against you," one Seahawk said after the 21-10 loss at Ford/Heinz Field. "No one wanted us to win. They wanted Jerome Bettis to win and go out a hero, and they got it."

Seattle had its share of goats: in particular, tight end Jerramy Stevens, who dropped four balls, and kicker Josh Brown, who missed two field-goal attempts. Almost to a man, the Seahawks pointed the blame finger at themselves for converting only one of three red zone attempts (when they had been the best in the league in that area, scoring a touchdown on 71.7 percent of their trips inside the 20-yard line); for allowing Ben Roethlisberger to improvise and complete a 37-yard pass to game MVP Hines Ward to the 1; for giving up a 75-yard touchdown run to Willie Parker; and for getting beaten by a trick play on Antwaan Randle El's pass to fellow receiver Ward for a touchdown, a first in Super Bowl history. If you read between the lines, though, they pretty much spelled out in bold letters that they had plenty of help in handing Pittsburgh its fifth Lombardi Trophy.

Namely, the boys in black and white.

"Those things are out of our control," Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck said of the three major penalties that helped change the game completely. Not saying the outcome of the game would have been any different, but for sure it would have been a different game. "That's the way [the officials] called them," Hasselbeck continued. "The Steelers played well enough to win tonight, and we didn't. They should get credit. It's disappointing, it's hard, but what are you going to do?"

Here's what referee Bill Leavy's crew did, point blank: It robbed Seattle. The Seahawks could have played better, sure. They could have done more to overcome the poor officiating. We understand that those things happen and all, but even with all the points Seattle left on the field, there's a good chance the Seahawks would have scored more than the Steelers if the officials had let the players play.

In the biggest game of the year, the biggest game in sports, even, the officials were just a little too visible. In that regard, the Super Bowl provided a fitting conclusion to a postseason packed with pitiful performances by the game's third team. There were incorrect down-by-contact rulings in both NFC wild-card games; a touchdown that could have gone either way and should have gone the other way -- in favor of Tampa Bay -- in the Bucs' loss to the Redskins; the Patriots got no love in Denver in being hit with a bogus pass interference penalty and not catching a break on Champ Bailey's fumble at the goal line that looked as though it could have been a touchback; and, of course, the Polamalu play.

Still, what happened to the Seahawks wasn't the same as, say, New England going into Denver and playing badly (five turnovers) on top of the bad calls. Seattle gained almost 400 yards and turned it over just once.

You see, you can spend weeks -- and we did; two, in fact -- analyzing and dissecting matchups and giving each team the edge in certain areas and trying to figure out how the game is going to play out, but the two things you can't account for are turnovers and officials. The latter were the X-factor Sunday. Edge: Steelers.

It actually was a fairly clean game from a penalty standpoint, without a whole lot of yellow on the field -- 10 accepted penalties between the teams. Seven were against the Seahawks, though, a team that tied with Indianapolis for the second-fewest penalties (94) in the regular season. But those calls against the Seahawks stuck out like the Space Needle on the Seattle skyline.

Consider: The Seahawks lost 161 yards to penalties when you combine the penalty yards (70) and the plays the flags wiped out (91). By halftime alone, when it trailed 7-3, Seattle had had 73 hard-earned yards and a touchdown eliminated.

Hasselbeck hit Darrell Jackson with an apparent 16-yard scoring pass in the first quarter, but the play came back when Jackson was called for offensive pass interference. It was a touch foul. Jackson extended his arm, yes, but both players were fighting for position, and he didn't create any separation by doing so. It was like a referee calling a hand-check in a key moment of Game 7 of the NBA Finals.

The Seahawks had to settle for three instead of seven.

Still, that was early, and that one didn't change the game as much as did a holding call against Sean Locklear early in the fourth quarter with Pittsburgh leading 14-10. That one wiped out an 18-yard catch by Stevens that would have taken the ball to the 1. Locklear supposedly held Clark Haggans, so instead of first-and-goal at the 1 and the chance to complete a 98-yard touchdown drive and take a three-point lead, Seattle faced first-and-20 at the 29.

Three plays later, Ike Taylor picked off a Hasselbeck pass, and Hasselbeck went low to make the tackle on Taylor's return and was called for a 15-yard personal foul for a low block. The Steelers set up shop at their 44. That one right there made no sense.

Pittsburgh likes to run its trick plays in the middle of the field. Boom! Four plays later, from Seattle's 43, Randle El took a reverse and threw a sweet strike on the run to Ward. It was 21-10, and that was all she wrote. Everyone knows how important it is to play Pittsburgh with a lead or with the score tied. The Steelers don't lose when they're up by 11.

Eleven just so happens to be the total points taken away by bogus calls. Some penalties meant points; others meant field position. A holding call in the second quarter negated Peter Warrick's 34-yard punt return that would have started Seattle in Pittsburgh territory.

By contrast, the Steelers might have gotten a break on Roethlisberger's 1-yard touchdown plunge on third-and-goal in the second quarter. Leavy reviewed the play under the booth's orders, since it occurred inside the two-minute mark, and while still photos of an airborne Roethlisberger showed that the ball might have broken the plane of the goal line, he landed short of it and reached the ball over. It was close. Head linesman Mark Hittner didn't seem so sure of it, hesitating before signaling touchdown.

"I don't think he scored," Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren said.

It was that kind of evening for the Seahawks, who represent a town where residents know all too well that when it rains, it pours. If having what seemed like 90 percent of the 68,200 in attendance waving Terrible Towels wasn't enough to make Seattle feel as though it was playing on the road, the officials called it as though the Seahawks actually were.

Pittsburgh capitalized on its opportunities. And guys like Bill Cowher, Ward, Dan Rooney and The Bus are all very deserving of a championship -- and it's nice to see them win one -- but it would have been better had it not happened like this. It's like the Seahawks said: Not taking anything away from the Steelers, but keep it real.

"We had a touchdown taken away from us, the first one we scored," said Hasselbeck, who was measured in his words but clear in his frustration, "and then we had the ball at the 1-yard line, they called a penalty on us. That was unfortunate."

"I thought they were offside [on the play Locklear was called for holding]," center Robbie Tobeck said. "I thought we had a free play on because they had two guys come across. You know, that's the game. In a game, there's situations you have to overcome, and all night long we didn't do a good job of overcoming those things, and that's something we've done all year."

In the offseason, 31 teams will be back at the drawing board, evaluating what they need to do to knock off the Steelers in the fall. After the postseason they just had, Mike Pereira and the NFL's crew of officials would be wise to take a long, hard look at themselves. It's a real shame when, on the game's biggest stage, the major players aren't players at all. We saw too much of the third team in Super Bowl XL and not enough Seahawks and Steelers.

Michael Smith is a senior writer for ESPN.com.
Link
 
#19
Superbowl XL MVP: The Refs

OK, seriously - I am not going to sit here and truly say that they "should just suck it up and win anyway". I'm not going to put myself in their (The Seahawks) shoes at all. It must have been a very sad and heartwrenching game to have so much taken from them. The stats say they won, the score does not.
 
#20
Been there, done that. It must be me... It seems to be following me everywhere I go. I was living in Sacramento back during the Kings vs. Lakers WCF series and witnessed some bad officiating. Now living in Seattle, I've witnessed the one-sided officiating again. Refs sucks!
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#21
Rain man said:
All in all, I thought the officiating was lousy. However, while Seattle can cry about missed calls all night, the fact of the matter is that they shot themselves in the foot. They beat Pittsburgh up, down, and around the field most of the game on both sides of the ball and never capitalized.

I am a huge Seahawks fan, and agree VF, that this was no SUPER bowl. Both teams played pretty lousy and the officiating was bad. But as a Hawks fan, it is pretty tough to point the fingers at the zebras when your own team played so poorly.
That's the point I was actually trying to make. You just did it better.

I was rooting for the Seahawks because my son-in-law is a lifelong fan. I really quit caring, however, around October. (I'm a 49er fan to the bone...)

Well, there's always next year. One thing the Hawks must address is ball handling. The best receivers in the world don't do anybody any good if they have lousy handles.
 
#22
Hard to capitalize when the refs actually take away points, position, and most importantly momentum from you. I don't think both teams played pretty lousy... I thought Seattle did pretty good for their first big game. Bad officiating should be on both sides not one.
 
#23
ultraman206 said:
Hard to capitalize when the refs actually take away points, position, and most importantly momentum from you. I don't think both teams played pretty lousy... I thought Seattle did pretty good for their first big game. Bad officiating should be on both sides not one.
yup. it's hard to believe that seattle (who was the 2nd least penalized team all year) had 70% of the penalties.
 
#24
Awful game with awful officiating.

But here's the thing: Right after the game I said "well, the refs sucked but Seattle had their chances nonetheless so I guess they can't complain"

Today I realized I was dead wrong. Remember Game 6?

Seahawks fans, I feel your pain.
 
#25
I'm not trying to play devil's advocate here because I'll admit there were some iffy calls, but there was blatant bad officiating going on during the Colts-Steelers game, and Pittsburgh still won.

Being a Super Bowl caliber team, Seattle should have been able to do the same thing, but most of the mistakes they made can't be blamed on the officials (i.e. dropped passes, missed field goals).


Like I said, I'm not purposely trying to ruffle feathers, just wanted to put out there my $.02.
 
#26
OHSacFan said:
I'm not trying to play devil's advocate here because I'll admit there were some iffy calls, but there was blatant bad officiating going on during the Colts-Steelers game, and Pittsburgh still won.

Being a Super Bowl caliber team, Seattle should have been able to do the same thing, but most of the mistakes they made can't be blamed on the officials (i.e. dropped passes, missed field goals).


Like I said, I'm not purposely trying to ruffle feathers, just wanted to put out there my $.02.
Like I said above, I was originally of this school of thought, but then I thought back to the way I felt in the WCF - the Kings had their chances despite the officials, but I was still mad as hell about the refs. Upon reflection, I identified with the Seattle fans' pain because regardless of how your team plays, you don't expect the officiating to be so onesided - all you want is a fair shot, and if you lose, you want it to be because you played poorly or the other team played great - not because you didn't play quite well enough to overcome a bunch of really bad calls.
 
#27
QueensFan said:
Like I said above, I was originally of this school of thought, but then I thought back to the way I felt in the WCF - the Kings had their chances despite the officials, but I was still mad as hell about the refs. Upon reflection, I identified with the Seattle fans' pain because regardless of how your team plays, you don't expect the officiating to be so onesided - all you want is a fair shot, and if you lose, you want it to be because you played poorly or the other team played great - not because you didn't play quite well enough to overcome a bunch of really bad calls.
Couldn't have said it better.

You also gotta give it to the Seahawks Organization; they have handled this very professionally.
 
#28
The problem that I don't mind seeing talked about is how the officiating affected the game because so many important questionable calls went against the Seahawks. What I completely disagree with, and think is a non-story, is that the officiating was horrible and they gave the game to the Steelers.

The refs did a poor job in my opinion. But the refs in every sport do a poor job. I can't think of any sport that doesn't have consistent complaints about how bad the officiating is.

Also, all of the calls were questionable. There were no obviously bad calls in my opinion (granted I don't know the holding rule all that well, so a couple of the holds might have been blatantly wrong). The fact that the questionable calls went against Seattle absolutely had an effect on the game. This sucks because you always want the effects of officiating to be minimal. But this was no screw job.
 
#29
ultraman206 said:
Couldn't have said it better.

You also gotta give it to the Seahawks Organization; they have handled this very professionally.
Meh, that's pretty questionable. I was utterly shocked to see Holmgren flat out blame the officiating for the loss - that seemed pretty unclassy to me. Hasselback was a little more subtle. There's definitely a lot of bitching coming out of Seattle but I'm not sure if I can blame them.
 
#30
OHSacFan said:
I'm not trying to play devil's advocate here because I'll admit there were some iffy calls, but there was blatant bad officiating going on during the Colts-Steelers game, and Pittsburgh still won.

Being a Super Bowl caliber team, Seattle should have been able to do the same thing, but most of the mistakes they made can't be blamed on the officials (i.e. dropped passes, missed field goals).


Like I said, I'm not purposely trying to ruffle feathers, just wanted to put out there my $.02.
nice avatar:rolleyes: