Offseason: Sac-Phx and Sac-NYK

RunNGun

G-League
These trades are based on the assumption that the Kings resign Artest for a sign and trade at roughly 12 million a year for X number of years (which is just under what the average SF of his caliber makes). Since few teams will have the cash to sign him straight up (at least the ones that want him) it seems like that a sign and trade is the only option if a team wants him.

Trade Scenario One:
Kings trade -
John Salmons
Mikki Moore
Atlanta's 2nd rounder

Suns trade -
Boris Diaw
+ about 2 million in filler contracts (resign Big Nasty for a sign and trade?)

Reasons:
The Shaq trade proves that the Suns are not only desperate for a championship now, but are willing to trade their future for it. Mikki Moore and John Salmons greatly improves the depth of their team and Diaw, while talented, does not provide the energy that Phoenix needs off the bench. D'antoni first tried to sign Salmons before he agreed to come to Sacramento so he obviously is interested. And though we rag on the Kings for having to start Moore he's perfect off the bench for Phx. He's worked with a superstar PG before and know the pick and role very well.

The Kings in return get another passing big man which is always a plus in my book. Kind of a poor mans Webber type. His contract also does not get larger over the years so even if he is a bust it won't cost the Kings like it did with Bibby.

Trade Scenario Two:
Kings trade -
Ron Artest (with a new contract)
2nd Round Pick

Knicks trade -
David Lee
Malik Rose (Expiring/Waived)
Wilson Chandler

Reasons:
More or less this is a return to the trade talks earlier this season. The Knicks get an All-star two way player and obviously the team isn't worried about team chemistry (see Zach and Marbury) without having to give up a star in return. The Kings get the golden boy David Lee as well as the untapped potential of Chandler. The only problem is this trade heavily depends on how much Artest gets paid.

On a side note I think we need to forget about dumping K9 and SARs contracts now. Its not likely a team will take either of them unless 1. They are desperate for big men (and I mean really desperate). Or 2. The other team is going to try and screw us over for another player. We've put up with them for this long why not wait till they earn their worth by becoming expiring contracts the season after. Those two will total 14 million in expiring contracts and if we use the precedent set by the Lakers and Memphis we should be able to get a superstar out of it.
 
Putting this into perspective, our new lineup should be:
PG: Udrih/(1st rounder?)/(Suns filler?)
SG: Martin/Douby
SF: Diaw/Cisco/Chandler
PF: Lee/Diaw/Williams/Thomas/Reef
C: Miller/Hawes/Rose (Should be cut)

That starting lineup would be kind of awesome. Just, where's the offense going to come from besides Martin?
 
Putting this into perspective, our new lineup should be:
PG: Udrih/(1st rounder?)/(Suns filler?)
SG: Martin/Douby
SF: Diaw/Cisco/Chandler
PF: Lee/Diaw/Williams/Thomas/Reef
C: Miller/Hawes/Rose (Should be cut)

That starting lineup would be kind of awesome. Just, where's the offense going to come from besides Martin?

You would be depending on Udrih to drop at least 20 a night.

And I would start Garcia instead of Diaw and there is another 18 a night.
 
I'm not say this is an answer all kind of deal. Just two steps in the right direction. Though we likely won't be lucky enough like the Lakers to get a superstar from the expiring contracts we should be able to pick up at least one or two legitimate scorers for the 1 and 3 spots. Besides I don't know about you but I'm looking at Hawes as being a player that's gonna average close to 20ppg in a couple seasons. He's Miller, but with a post game and a better shot.
 
couldnt we just trade artest for lee and start salmons at sf..... i like diaw but what would be the point of having him on the team?
 
couldnt we just trade artest for lee and start salmons at sf..... i like diaw but what would be the point of having him on the team?

Salmons is a great player no doubt about it and I love the guy especially for the money we got him. However he also frustrates me to no end. At least 2-3 times a game he will pass up a wide open 3 or long range 2 that he could easily hit for a tough drive to the paint. Salmons doesn't seem to realize that Beno driving the lane is meant to open him up for a jump shot, it's not meant to bring in more defenders for Salmons to try and beat in the paint. With Kevin and Beno we have enough slashers in the backcourt so I'm looking for range at the 3 (Garcia) to spread the court.

As I see it Salmons is a high valued asset on the team and is the only way we could clear off some of our excess big men. Since Mikki also has some decent value to certain teams we can easily package them together for a decent young player.
 
Diaw has a bad contract that goes against our need to shed salary. Plus, he isn't the answer to what we need.

And hell could freeze over and the Knicks still aren't going to trade Lee for Artest. Forget about Lee people, he aint' coming.
 
Diaw has a bad contract that goes against our need to shed salary. Plus, he isn't the answer to what we need.

And hell could freeze over and the Knicks still aren't going to trade Lee for Artest. Forget about Lee people, he aint' coming.

yeah, i didn't like the diaw trade. he isn't that effective if not placed in the right system. when the suns were playing him at PF or center, he had an advantage due to his excellent ball handling abilities.

NYK's lotto pick is looking pretty nice right now. zeke is going to get alot of offers for it. i'd take that pick over lee anyday :)
 
Back
Top