Los Angeles Sparks For Sale??

#1
Sparks' Buss steps down; team might be sold

By Mike Terry
Times Staff Writer

October 31, 2006

Sparks President Johnny Buss, who has run the WNBA franchise through eight seasons, said Monday that he is stepping down. He also said there is a possibility that the team would be put up for sale.

Although Buss did not name an immediate successor, he disclosed that General Manager Penny Toler had already started taking more responsibility for running the day-to-day operation. Toler, a former Sparks player who was hired as general manager in 1999, could not be immediately reached for comment.

"I have not officially offered a letter of resignation, but it is something I will have to do," said Buss, whose father, Jerry, also owns the Lakers. "We will make an official announcement soon. It's a big thing for me."

He declined to say what he would be doing but said he would stay on as a team consultant for the time being.

"But Penny knows what decisions to make," Buss added.

The Sparks, who were knocked out of the playoffs last season in the Western Conference finals, have flourished under Johnny Buss, who turned 50 this month. They won championships in 2001 and 2002 and have made the playoffs every season since.

"I can't say we will or will not sell the franchise, especially with recent happenings with Houston," he said, referring to the WNBA's Comets. "I've been talking with my dad, and we don't want to damage what we've got."

Two weeks ago it was reported that Comets owner Leslie Alexander wanted to sell the team and concentrate solely on the NBA Houston Rockets, which he also owns.

Said Buss: "If we're going to [sell], we need to do it now. I would hate to get involved with player acquisitions and things like that, and disrupt the operation. Hopefully a decision will be made by the end of the year. If something does not happen then, I doubt anything would happen until after next season."

Buss said some of his siblings were approached about the job, including his sister Janie.

"She wanted to take them over and I was OK with it," he said of Janie, who has two children. "But because of her family commitments, she finally had to decline."

At the moment, no other family member wants to assume control of the Sparks, Buss said.

He declined to put a dollar figure on the franchise, although a league source estimated the Sparks' value "around $15 million." That figure is based, the source said, on the $10-million league entry fee for the Connecticut Sun in 2003, and the new Chicago Sky last season.

WNBA President Donna Orender on Monday said Buss has been "an inspiring leader throughout the years as the president of the Los Angeles Sparks."

"I would expect that Johnny Buss' heart and passion would remain with the Sparks and WNBA no matter where he goes," she said. Orender added that she did not immediately see the Sparks relocating or Los Angeles not having a WNBA team.

"Los Angeles is a fantastic WNBA market, and we only see upside," she said.

This is not the first time the Buss family has considered ending its relationship with the Sparks. In 1999, Jerry Buss wasn't convinced that the team could be a successful draw in L.A. and almost did not extend his agreement with the NBA to continue his ownership. Instead, Johnny Buss, a longtime WNBA fan, took the reins. Since the 2000 season, L.A. has won five regular-season Western Conference titles and three Western Conference playoff championships.

Buss sees Toler as a natural choice to take over his role.

"And we're OK with that," he said, referring to the Buss family. "Right now, everything is good."
 
#2
This to me is a huge red flag for the league. When the two model franchises in the WNBA (Houston and Los Angeles with six championships between them) are currently being or considered being sold and the uncertainty of Seattle and Sacramento.....what is this saying about the league. I really don't know, but I do not like the feel of this.

I like Orender. She is "The Female David Stern" as far as charisma is concerned. But since she has been on board as President of the league, the product on the floor is better, but the spirit in the ownership and front offices seems to be in transition coming away from the NBA. And I don't know about anybody else, I don't think this league can survive without the backing of the NBA.

Comments? Help me out.
 
#3
This to me is a huge red flag for the league. When the two model franchises in the WNBA (Houston and Los Angeles with six championships between them) are currently being or considered being sold and the uncertainty of Seattle and Sacramento.....what is this saying about the league. I really don't know, but I do not like the feel of this.

I like Orender. She is "The Female David Stern" as far as charisma is concerned. But since she has been on board as President of the league, the product on the floor is better, but the spirit in the ownership and front offices seems to be in transition coming away from the NBA. And I don't know about anybody else, I don't think this league can survive without the backing of the NBA.

Comments? Help me out.
The WNBA is in deep deep trouble. Having the NBA franchises sell off their WNBA counterparts is a huge blow to the teams and the league in general. Most teams make money off of tv deals and other promotions. Well, teams like LA and Houston only get tv deals because they are negotiated into the NBA tv deal contracts. The Rockets for example force FSN to telecast Comets games and pay for them in order to get the Rockets. The same goes with LA. Without that negotiating power, there's no way Comets and Sparks games get regular tv time. The same goes for radio deals which were also attached to NBA radio deals. Also, most NBA franchises own their arenas so the WNBA teams got to play for free there since they were controlled by the same ownership. Now if they get sold, they're stuck paying rent to play at the same arenas they used to get for free.

So yes, they're slowly getting screwed over by all of the sales.
 
#4
I'm not panicking....yet. Here's why. Firstly, the league is going on its 11th year now, let's celebrate that accomplishment for a second. Because there was a point in time when we didn't think it would last that long when all the contracting started.

Secondly...from what I've been told by our friend in Houston, there are buyers interested locally, so as far as he's concerned he's not worried about his team leaving.

Thirdly, haven't we had discussions about the Sparks over the years. Their lousy attendance etc? I'm honestly more surprised that they've been in this long and honestly VERY surprised to read the behind the scenes about what they've thought about doing and how Johnny Buss got involved in the first place. I never got the feeling as an outsider that there was a committed person at the ownership level. We also need to have these thoughts about Minnesota and Charlotte, two other long struggling franchises as well. There will be change.

Lastly, the league can survive without the NBA, it technically has for the last few years when the league restructured and all the NBA owners who didn't want to pony up their own money to run the teams and eat the operating costs they now have had to eat themselves instead of the league. The league just now needs committed owners with the money and the fan base and the intestinal fortitude to be in the league for the long haul. That I think Donna O has been good about cultivating and building intentially towards.

I'm also not sure the Monarchs future is cloudy, if someone can enlighten me more about the blurb in today's Bee article I'd appreciate it. My first thought having read only the MOU and the latest Maloof response is that it was a realism based contract revision based on business rather than any indication that they intend to not keep the Monarchs around in the near term and move them to whatever new arena they move to. As with Seattle, I don't necessarily believe that the WNBA franchise would move with the MNBA franchise if a relocation were to happen with both Sacramento teams. And I'm not sure the Maloofs have any financial reason not to keep the Monarchs and have them play in this mythical new Sacramento arena if its a place built by the City/County. They still would be on the hook for finding events to hold in it, and the Monarchs at the very least serve that purpose as cold reality.

The league has successfully reincorporated into new cities/areas and brought in new ownership groups outside of the NBA base, so the model is there with Chicago, Connecticut and Washington. Apparently more cities are looking to get in. It's about change and growth. It happens in all sports leagues and as long as there are buyers wanting in, I think its a good sign of growth and long term health. These folks wouldn't be itching to plunk down 10-15 million for something that could die tomorrow. So there must be a reason for them to have some eagerness.
 
#5
Those media deals may be "forced" but from the regional sports channel perspective, they need programming too so I'm not sure much arm twisting was needed to get them to take the programming they get over the summer. And I don't think many of the teams get this programming for free as a take it over leave it deal. W teams are more likely to find a willing media outlet because there is so much saturation.

Also, with the arenas? Yeah, that's true that some of them aren't paying rent. But they are paying operational costs to staff the arena for the non NBA related events. So that is money out of their coffers that they are having to spend for this purported "free" tenant they have.
 
#6
Those media deals may be "forced" but from the regional sports channel perspective, they need programming too so I'm not sure much arm twisting was needed to get them to take the programming they get over the summer. And I don't think many of the teams get this programming for free as a take it over leave it deal. W teams are more likely to find a willing media outlet because there is so much saturation.

Also, with the arenas? Yeah, that's true that some of them aren't paying rent. But they are paying operational costs to staff the arena for the non NBA related events. So that is money out of their coffers that they are having to spend for this purported "free" tenant they have.
I disagree entirely, at least here in texas, high school football on FSN gets higher ratings than WNBA games. And whatever national sports radio is out there would do better than WNBA games on radio. The ratings are just abysmal and FSN has complained to the Rockets all the time about being forced to air WNBA games. I'm sure they'd pick up some games with new ownership but they show nearly 2/3s of all comets games right now and there's no way in hell they'd keep doing that if they weren't forced to by Rockets management.

As for paying for staffing non-nba related events, yes but that's money that Les Alexander spends anyway regardless of whether the Comets are under his ownership. The Comets don't actually pay anything to play at Toyota Center but would if they were under new ownership.

When news broke that the Comets were on the market, people didn't even care. There's no outrage or or anger from anyone. Local radio just proceeded to laugh it off and news media mentioned it one day and never spoke of it again. The team has no support in houston anymore, and can't turn a profit. The franchise itself is only worth something like 10 million dollars which is less than half of Kevin Garnett's yearly salary.

Don't get me wrong, there definitely are markets where WNBA teams could survive. (personally, I think a city like Austin would serve a team like the Comets a lot better, considering they don't have any pro teams and have cheaper basketball facilities to rent out than a large place like the Toyota Center which is way way too big for the WNBA) I think WNBA teams should focus on building up in smaller markets that could better prize having a professional team rather than focusing on places like Houston or LA where they get lower ratings than minor league hockey and high school football. (Yes our minor league hockey team, the Aeros gets more press coverage and acclaim than the Comets)