I assume this "4" year deals includes this year, so we will not be in the Keon trap and he will be an RFA at the conclusion.
I would assume that year 1 is this year.I assume this "4" year deals includes this year, so we will not be in the Keon trap and he will be an RFA at the conclusion.
RIIIIGHT?!?
Solid, obvious move. Not unexpected but surprisingly quick!
So, in other words, we have 2 years to f this one up before, well, you know...
When do you NOT need those types of player?Good news. He earned it.
With Cardwell, Precious, and Hunter. Perry has managed to aquire the type of players the Kings really needed 2 years ago.
When do you NOT need those types of player?
Buzzkill. This was Keon's fourth year though, wasn't it?I would assume that year 1 is this year.
I know that teams have been constructing deals for second-round players that resemble the deals being given to players late in the first round, but I can find nothing in the CBA that allows for restricted free agency for a four-year player except for a true "Rookie Scale Contract", and I can find nothing that suggests that a "Rookie Scale Contract" may be offered to any player *except* a first round pick. Dylan was not a first round pick. I believe that if we exercise the team option after year 2, we will not be able to make him a restricted free agent. I believe this is exactly the Keon situation, but with one extra year on the deal.
I would assume that year 1 is this year.
I know that teams have been constructing deals for second-round players that resemble the deals being given to players late in the first round, but I can find nothing in the CBA that allows for restricted free agency for a four-year player except for a true "Rookie Scale Contract", and I can find nothing that suggests that a "Rookie Scale Contract" may be offered to any player *except* a first round pick. Dylan was not a first round pick. I believe that if we exercise the team option after year 2, we will not be able to make him a restricted free agent. I believe this is exactly the Keon situation, but with one extra year on the deal.
See my comment above (#6)...So we get 2 more Dylan years before we let him walk in UFA and decline his RFA rights?
...yes, you're right.Buzzkill. This was Keon's fourth year though, wasn't it?
(It's comment #6 if you don't have anybody muted.)See my comment above (#5)...![]()
Fixed! Thanks!(It's comment #6 if you don't have anybody muted.)
I know you're mostly throwing shade about Keon, but if the structure of the contract allows us to end it after the third season (i.e. "two more years") then we would have RFA rights, if we wanted them. We only lose the ability to submit that QO if we keep him all four years.So we get 2 more Dylan years before we let him walk in UFA and decline his RFA rights?
...yes, you're right.
But his first year was entirely on a two-way deal, he didn't get his NBA deal until late in his second year.
It's not yet clear how the final two years of Cardwell's contract are structured, but if we could exit the contract after year three, we could still make him an RFA. But not after year four. So...not necessarily exactly like the Keon situation, because Keon had a "non-NBA-contract" year at the beginning, but otherwise the parallels are the same. Cardwell would be eligible for an extension two years from today (that's one year in his career earlier than Keon).
So we could extend him a full year before we'd be forced to lose him. Which gets rid of the worst part. Plus this would actually carry Bird rights in a trade since it is 3.5 years on fully guaranteed first team deal. I had always assumed Bird rights carried over in Keon deals but from the reports when the Cavs took him it looked like since it was only 2.5 years at the NBA level they only have early-Bird....yes, you're right.
But his first year was entirely on a two-way deal, he didn't get his NBA deal until late in his second year.
It's not yet clear how the final two years of Cardwell's contract are structured, but if we could exit the contract after year three, we could still make him an RFA. But not after year four. So...not necessarily exactly like the Keon situation, because Keon had a "non-NBA-contract" year at the beginning, but otherwise the parallels are the same. Cardwell would be eligible for an extension two years from today (that's one year in his career earlier than Keon).
Yesterday we were paying him to be Dylan Cardwell. With all this extra cash NOW who are we paying him to be?
Sounds like it’s the year three RFA option then
Seems like our defensive player quota has been fulfilled for the next few years. Since you know, there can only ever be one.![]()
To be fair we have 2, 3 if Devin continues to get minutes
Trey Lyles.Yesterday we were paying him to be Dylan Cardwell. With all this extra cash NOW who are we paying him to be?
I assume this "4" year deals includes this year, so we will not be in the Keon trap and he will be an RFA at the conclusion.
RIIIIGHT?!?