I'm really close to giving up on willie.
The draft and/or free agency could put a lot of pressure on him to bring it more consistently. I do think his defensive value is not something that will ever been seen on a stat sheet though. He does things defensively that few bigs his size can.
I think he'll pair great with Jaren Jackson!
he’s having a good season..Willie is going to be a key player in this league. His length and ability to show on pick n rolls will be invaluable. I know he doesn’t consistently play excellent defense but I think his priorities change from game to game because there is opportunity to show all aspects of his game or whatever he’s working on at that time.
He just needs to discover his exact role. Right now he seems to have high scoring ambitions and I guess now is the best time to explore it while nobody else is firmly taking that mantle. We’ve seen Willie be a game changer before. That Philly game was a prime example.
Willie at worst is the player i thought we were getting when we drafted him but I still see a lot of room and ability for improvement.
The draft and/or free agency could put a lot of pressure on him to bring it more consistently. I do think his defensive value is not something that will ever been seen on a stat sheet though. He does things defensively that few bigs his size can.
He really does a lot that other big men can't do that doesn't get shown on the stat sheet but then he also doesn't do the simple things that other big men are expected to do like protect the rim.
I really liked the defense tonight with Koufos and Sampson in the game. If the TWolves attempted a shot in the paint they either had a hand in their face or got fouled hard (well hard for today's NBA standards). That never happens when WCS is in the game. Koufos doesn't even block a lot of shots these days but he still protects the rim better than Willie.
I'm just trying to figure out what is more valuable. Is it more valuable to be able to switch and guard smaller players without getting burnt or is it more valuable to provide good resistance in the paint? I feel like rim protection is more valuable because it's needed more often than switching onto smaller players. Like if you told me I had to pick the best starting 5 for the Kings to win the most games possible this year, I'd pick Koufos because of his consistency and defense around the rim.
I'm all for keeping Willie whether he's a starter or not but I'd never give him a big contract.
I think something that gets lost is how many times Willie cuts guys off before they get into the paint forcing them into a perimeter shot. It is easy to get caught up in blocked shots, but how often does it actually stop a basket? For instance, there was a sequence tonight where Towns blocked a shot only to have it go to another King. He then blocked their shot as well, but again it went to a King who then scored. In the stat sheet that looks really good. 2 blocks and 33% shooting, but ultimately it was one possession by the Kings that ended up with a basket.
That's it in a nutshell. I don't think either he or Joerger have figured that out quite yet, possibly because there are still some questions to answer.
I have to disagree about him not doing what Joerger wants. Willie averages close to 30 minutes per game, I believe he is at the top of the list for the Kings, just a tick more than Bogdanovic, although Bogs might have passed him after yersterday's game. We are just talking tenths.I believe wholeheartedly that Joerger and Divac have determined what WCS's role should be going forward, but I don't believe that WCS is ok with that role. This may be a situation in which a young guy just can't believe what he's hearing from his coach or management about his role, and will only believe it when he hears it from another coach of another team. Kind of like a young adult who doesn't believe what his parent says until he hears it from a different source, or a spouse not hearing it from a spouse until he/she hears it from another "independent" source.
As others have said, he's inconsistent. When it comes to the offensive side of his game I don't believe his inconsistency is because of effort; I just see a guy who just isn't as talented in terms of his balance, agility, and touch to be first or second option on a good team. And let's think of where he would fit on a very good team. Where would he fit on the Warriors? He'd only be "garbage guy." Same thing for the Rockets, Celtics, Cavs, Raptors, Spurs, Timberwolves and Thunder. If he were traded to one of those teams, they'd immediately define for him what his role was in no uncertain terms, and because he's on a good team, he would probably go out there and do exactly what they told him to do, and he'd probably be pretty darned good doing it.
Unlike his offense, I believe his defense and rebounding is inconsistent because of inconsistent effort. We've even heard comments from him to that effect. As he gets closer and closer to the end of his contract, I would expect for his defensive effort, including rebounding, to become more and more consistent. But what makes it so difficult for me to figure out WCS is this question: What would his defensive/rebounding effort be after he getting a contract renewal from the Kings? I don't know the answer to that. Is he going to mature into a player that gives that consistent effort, or is he going to revert to his mean of inconsistent effort because now he's got the contract?
I agree with everything in your post except for your assertion that Willie is "kind of lazy" and has a "low bball iq." You're entitled to your opinion, of course, but in my opinion, that's unfair and without merit.I'm really curious to see what he gets on the open market. He's got such an interesting game. He's improved in the areas he wasn't drafted for (shooting and scoring) and hasn't improved in the ones he was (rebounding and defense). He's ridiculously athletic, but also kind of lazy and has a pretty low bball iq. I'm honestly not sure what his long term potential is.
I was waiting for one of you to bring up Clint! Now I can rest easy.I don't see why WCS cant be like Clint Capela. Thats the player style he should be molding himself after.
I agree with you - except for the self-love comment.Depending on the front office's read on WCS's contract expectations - I'm ok with moving on from him.
Based on his self-love, I think WCS will want top tier big man money... and he is not a top tier big man. He's a very nice utility big. He's not a starter on a perennial playoff team imo.
If he wants the right money for that role then I'm good.
If we wants "DeMarcus heir apparent" money... bye
I have to disagree about him not doing what Joerger wants. Willie averages close to 30 minutes per game, I believe he is at the top of the list for the Kings, just a tick more than Bogdanovic, although Bogs might have passed him after yersterday's game. We are just talking tenths.
Joerger has shown no hesitation at all about sitting players that don't play the way he wants (see Skal). He sat Willie for quite a while in a game the other day when he didn't like the way Willie was executing (a little too much ISO). So, I think Willie is playing or at least attempting to play the way Joerger wants him to. I think Joerger is trying to see what he has with Willie and how much Willie can grow.
From the time he hurt his back until he hurt his knee, he put together a pretty good 22 game stretch.
Interesting, good data.You may be right that WCS knows what Joerger want. I'm not claiming he can't understand Joerger. I just don't think he's giving Joerger what he wants from his center looking into next year and beyond. It's not like Joerger has much to choose from on this team when it comes to rebounders; Joerger is forced to use WCS whether he wants to or not.
Here are the rebounding stats in terms of average and standard deviation over the 20 games prior to the injury; also a nice graph that shows the ups and downs over the 20 games. (See link below for graph). So we'll imagine that injuries have no place in our analysis of WCS (but we know that they really do). That's an average of 8.0 per game. For the season, WCS is averaging 6.7 rebounds per game. His standard deviation (measure of consistency) over those 20 games, or variance from the mean over the 20 games is 2.5. I'd love to know how that 2.5 SD stacks up against other centers around the league. I'd also like that SD stat for the entire season, but just don't want to punch in the numbers for all those games. If "Stat Man" can find SDs easily and compare to other centers, it would be very interesting to see. Then we could actually see statistically how much more or less consistent WCS in rebounding compared to other centers around the league.
http://www.calculator.net/standard-deviation-calculator.html?numberinputs=4,9,10,11,10,6,13,7,4,9,4,8,8,9,9,7,11,9,6,6&x=90&y=8