Bee: Plan to support Nolan well-suited for 49er fans

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#1
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/217523.html

Plan to support Nolan is well-suited for 49ers fans
By Matthew Barrows - Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:00 am PDT Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1


SANTA CLARA -- Reebok might be able to prevent Mike Nolan from wearing a suit on the 49ers' sideline, but the sneaker giant is powerless to stop a stadium-load of fans from donning their Sunday best on game day.

Call it the Formalwear Revolution, which was sparked last week by an Internet zealot who read that Nolan wasn't getting anywhere in his quest to permanently return the coat and tie to the NFL sideline. So "Ninerfan21" made a modest proposal: Why don't the 49ers' fans show Reebok where to shove it by showing up to the team's Sept. 10 home opener -- a prime-time affair, mind you -- dressed as businessmen? Since then, the idea has spread like chicken pox at summer camp.

And why not? It's a creative way of sticking it to a faceless, multi-gazillion-dollar corporation that insists grown men coach football games as if they're getting ready to run a 5K. It's a lesson to all the kids out there: You don't need lawsuits to settle disputes.

You just need suits.

And you have to believe that ESPN, which will air the opener, will have a field day with the concept. Every segue to a commercial -- and Lord knows there will be a lot of them -- will involve a throng of dapper Nolanites in button-down suits.

Finally, it's a novel concept.

Back when Y.A. Tittle and Joe Perry were playing, the stands were filled with fans in tweed and fedoras. Since then, the fan look has moved away from Joseph Abboud and toward, say, Kid Rock. The suit and tie could become a San Francisco trademark, like cheeseheads in Green Bay or hog noses in D.C.

Tipped off that there's a revolution afoot, Nolan laughed.

"I'll say this," he said, "I hope they do it for the same reason I'm doing it, which is out of respect for the league, the 49ers and to those who have done it in the past."

Then he let the idea sink in.

"I like it," he finally said. "It shows unity. I like that."

Reebok admittedly pays a lot -- $250 million -- to be the NFL's tailor, but it's hard to imagine the sneaker company continuing to fight this and looking anything but venal and petty.

The suit, after all, is designed to make men look good.

Middle-aged men generally don't belong in clothing designed for younger men, as anyone who witnessed Chicago Cubs manager Lou Piniella spilling out of his uniform last week can attest. (Apparently, the moniker "Sweet Lou" now applies to his favorite food group.) When Nolan and Jacksonville coach Jack Del Rio were permitted to wear Reebok-approved suits for two games last season, the experiment was considered a success. Despite heaps of positive reviews -- and a lot of glowing press for Reebok -- Nolan and his black suit only will be allowed to make two appearances again this year.

Reebok surely wants the issue to die, and despite having what seems to be a small army of public relations specialists, had a devil of a time returning phone calls on Monday.

Last year Nolan, too, seemed a bit embarrassed by all the attention paid to the suit debate. This season, however, he's resolute in his quest.

The reason, he disclosed last week, is that the health of his father, former 49ers coach Dick Nolan, is deteriorating. The elder Nolan suffers from Alzheimer's disease and last month was placed in an assisted living facility for patients suffering dementia. The 75-year-old Nolan also is fighting prostate cancer.

Dick Nolan coached alongside men such as Tom Landry and Hank Stram, in an era in which coaches wore suits on the sideline. The younger Nolan's desire to do the same is an homage -- a tip of the fedora, if you will -- to the men who helped build the league and especially to his father.

It is for that reason that Nolan won't let the issue go. And it is for that reason Reebok should give in.

Viva La RevoluciĆ³n!

About the writer: The Bee's Matthew Barrows can be reached mbarrows@sacbee.com.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#4
Dick Nolan coached alongside men such as Tom Landry and Hank Stram, in an era in which coaches wore suits on the sideline. The younger Nolan's desire to do the same is an homage -- a tip of the fedora, if you will -- to the men who helped build the league and especially to his father.

It is for that reason that Nolan won't let the issue go. And it is for that reason Reebok should give in.
And my admiration for Mike Nolan continues to grow.

:)
 
#5
Nolan gets a victory! ^_^

http://49ers.pressdemocrat.com/default.asp?item=624300

NFL is allowing him to wear a suit for 8 home games, sweet.

Here's the text - VF21

Nolan allowed to wear suit for eight home games

Mike Nolan will be allowed to wear a suit on the sideline for each of the 49ers' eight home games, an NFL spokesman said today.

"We've agreed to coach Nolan's request," said Brian McCarthy, the NFL's director of corporate communications. "He told us he was looking (to wear the suit) for the eight home games."

The issue generated a lot of conversation among 49ers fans in the past week, as Nolan said he had been told that he could wear a suit on the sideline for only two games this season. He and Jaguars coach Jack Del Rio wore suits during two games last season, too.

McCarthy emphasized it is the NFL that determines the policy for what coaches wear on the sideline. Nolan said last week that he was under the impression it was Reebok making the decision. Reebok pays the NFL a reported $250 million to be the clothing supplier for the league.

Shortly after the issue resurfaced last week, 49ers fans began showing their support for Nolan. On this blog, a person identifying himself as "ninerfan21" first suggested fans wear suits for the 49ers' season-opening Monday night game against the Cardinals on Sept. 10. It was an idea that gained a lot of momentum in short period of time.

So why did the NFL decide to change its policy?

"Commissioner (Roger) Goodell took a harder look at it and he supported the issue," McCarthy said. "In recognition of Nolan's desire to salute and honor his father, we expanded (the policy) to meet his request."

Nolan's father, Dick, was a head coach for 11 seasons, including eight with the 49ers. He led the 49ers to their first three division titles. Like many of the coaches of yesteryear, Dick Nolan wore a suit and tie on the sideline.

Recently, Dick has fallen on hard times. He has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and lives in an assisted-living facility in Texas for patients dealing with dementia. He also suffers from prostate cancer.

Nolan is does not plan to wear a suit during the exhibition season. He asked to wear the suit for the eight home games, instead of the full 16-game regular season, as a compromise, a 49ers spokesman said.

When Nolan was hired as coach of the 49ers in January 2005, he informed the league of his desire to be allowed to wear a suit on the sideline. According to McCarthy, it was "too late in the cycle" for the league to do anything for that season.

Nolan and Del Rio worked with Reebok to design suits to be worn for two games apiece last season.

During the league meeting in March, the league asked the remaining coaches if they had any desire to wear suits. Nobody chose to join Nolan and Del Rio, although Nolan said last week 49ers assistant head coach Mike Singletary would like to wear a suit when he becomes a head coach.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#7
He should be allowed to wear a suit for all 16 games, its rather ridiculous that anyone would get in his way.

And this comes from a Belichik fan.
 
#8
McCarthy emphasized it is the NFL that determines the policy for what coaches wear on the sideline. Nolan said last week that he was under the impression it was Reebok making the decision. Reebok pays the NFL a reported $250 million to be the clothing supplier for the league.
...
So why did the NFL decide to change its policy?
"Commissioner (Roger) Goodell took a harder look at it and he supported the issue," McCarthy said. "In recognition of Nolan's desire to salute and honor his father, we expanded (the policy) to meet his request."
More likely, the NFL finally figured out that Reebok wouldn't be interested in the bad press that would result if they sued the NFL for breach of contract on this issue.