76ers could acquire $36 million lottery pick via major trade with Kings

  • Thread starter Yahoo! Sports - NBA - Sacramento Kings News
  • Start date
Y

Yahoo! Sports - NBA - Sacramento Kings News

Guest
#1


The Philadelphia 76ers are surely in the market for additional talent to solidify their chances of competing for a championship in the Eastern Conference. There's a lot of directions for the front office to go at the trade deadline, but a score-first wing feels like the ideal acquisition. Golden State Warriors' Jonathan Kuminga and Sacramento Kings' Keegan Murray are a few forwards with uncertain futures. Kuminga has remained in trade rumors over the past several months while Murray was forced into a backseat role by the addition of star DeMar DeRozan.

Continue reading...
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#3
This is the second time a Keegan to 6ers story has appeared from nowhere ... I'm sorry but what would they be giving us in return?

They called Keegan a "forward with [an] uncertain future" I'm sorry what's uncertain until his second contract extension?
 

iowamcnabb

Hall of Famer
#4
This is the second time a Keegan to 6ers story has appeared from nowhere ... I'm sorry but what would they be giving us in return?

They called Keegan a "forward with [an] uncertain future" I'm sorry what's uncertain until his second contract extension?
they are all just regurgitating the same fantasy trade that some nerd came up with. If we were ever stupid enough to trade Keegan it certainly wouldn’t be for draft picks like they have proposed
 
Last edited:
#6
This is the second time a Keegan to 6ers story has appeared from nowhere ... I'm sorry but what would they be giving us in return?

They called Keegan a "forward with [an] uncertain future" I'm sorry what's uncertain until his second contract extension?
On the last one, I think they said KJ Martin, Adem Bona and a first rounder.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#8
In today's NBA, Keegan Murray is worth three unprotected picks and three pick swaps...if he's on a team that's tanking. He is unavailable when he's on a team that intends to compete.
That's the wild part. He's the best value contract we have aside from Keon, but I could be wrong we have cost controls on his contract that last longer. The only way you could move him is if it was for an all-star caliber player at a position we felt was a bigger need but feels like you hope that one of those 3 picks turns into a player like Keegan, which would be tough considering the Sixers are in the East and probably guaranteed to make the playoffs for a while.
 

Capt. Factorial

ceterum censeo delendum esse Argentum
Staff member
#9
That's the wild part. He's the best value contract we have aside from Keon, but I could be wrong we have cost controls on his contract that last longer. The only way you could move him is if it was for an all-star caliber player at a position we felt was a bigger need but feels like you hope that one of those 3 picks turns into a player like Keegan, which would be tough considering the Sixers are in the East and probably guaranteed to make the playoffs for a while.
Eastern Conference 73-92 .442
Western Conference 92-71 .564

If the season ended today the bottom play-in team (#10) in the West would be at .545, and would be the #3 seed (by themselves) in the East. The #10 seed in the East right now is at .364.

It's well past time to scrap East/West playoff splits, play a balanced schedule, and let the top teams in.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#10
What would a balanced schedule look like with 30 teams? 58 games? 87 with unbalanced home/away fixtures? Maybe you could expand the in-season tournament and make it not count for playoff seeding? I don't know but imagine you'd still have to have some division to fill the schedule and reduce travel drag, but at the same time maybe you can do it in a way that only guarantees sports for division winners and seeds 1-16 (and any play-ins? arguably only > .500 teams should qualify for a play in).
 
#11
Eastern Conference 73-92 .442
Western Conference 92-71 .564

If the season ended today the bottom play-in team (#10) in the West would be at .545, and would be the #3 seed (by themselves) in the East. The #10 seed in the East right now is at .364.

It's well past time to scrap East/West playoff splits, play a balanced schedule, and let the top teams in.
Yeh we can’t have teams missing the playoffs with 44 wins
 

Capt. Factorial

ceterum censeo delendum esse Argentum
Staff member
#13
What would a balanced schedule look like with 30 teams? 58 games? 87 with unbalanced home/away fixtures? Maybe you could expand the in-season tournament and make it not count for playoff seeding? I don't know but imagine you'd still have to have some division to fill the schedule and reduce travel drag, but at the same time maybe you can do it in a way that only guarantees sports for division winners and seeds 1-16 (and any play-ins? arguably only > .500 teams should qualify for a play in).
Obviously you can't do perfectly balanced, but the idea would be that the mixture is random, rather than Boston getting to beat up on ten crappy teams while we languish against ten playoff-level teams. Two games (home+away) against everybody leaves 24 games left, you just miss out on the third matchup with a random five teams.
 
#14
What would a balanced schedule look like with 30 teams? 58 games? 87 with unbalanced home/away fixtures? Maybe you could expand the in-season tournament and make it not count for playoff seeding? I don't know but imagine you'd still have to have some division to fill the schedule and reduce travel drag, but at the same time maybe you can do it in a way that only guarantees sports for division winners and seeds 1-16 (and any play-ins? arguably only > .500 teams should qualify for a play in).
Add two teams. Everyone plays each other twice in a 62 game season. It's still 24 more games per team than the Premier League, without counting the NBA playoffs and the tournament play in soccer/ football.
 
#15
Stopped reading at "there's a lot of directions". Any reputable news outlet would have said, "there are a lot of directions.

Let's just focus on upgrading our frontcourt bench. Big moves are not what we need.
 
#16
Add two teams. Everyone plays each other twice in a 62 game season. It's still 24 more games per team than the Premier League, without counting the NBA playoffs and the tournament play in soccer/ football.
Add Seattle and Vegas. To the Western Conference.

Move one of Minnesota, Memphis, or New Orleans to the Eastern Conference (whichever makes the most sense logistically).

Cut division alignment and just have conference alignment (that’s pretty much how they display standings now anyway).

Scheduling option #1:

Cut the regular season from 82 to 77 games.

Each team plays 3 games against the other 15 conference opponents (45 games). 3 games makes for an easy head-to-head tiebreaker. Home court advantage rotates every season.

Each team plays 2 games against the 16 non-conference opponents, just as it is now (32 games).

There’s your 77 games, which also helps cut down on needing to play back-to-back games.

Scheduling option #2:

An alternative plan is a 76-game schedule.

Each team plays the other 15 conference opponents 4x (60 games) and the 16 non-conference opponents only once (16 games) with home court rotating every season.

Scheduling option #3:

Align each conference into 4 divisions of 4 teams.

Each team plays their 3 division opponents 4x (12 games).

Each team plays the remaining 12 conference (non-divisional) opponents 3x (36 games). Home court rotates each season.

Each team plays 2 games against the 16 teams non-conference opponents, just as it is now (32 games).

That’s a total of 80 games and only a reduction of 2 regular season games.

Scheduling option #4:

Align each conference into 2 divisions of 8.

Each team plays their 7 division opponents 4x (28 games).

Each team plays the remaining 8 conference (non-divisional) opponents 3x (24 games). Home court rotates each season.

Each team plays 2 games against the 16 teams non-conference opponents, just as it is now (32 games).

That’s a total of 84 games and only an addition of 2 regular season games.
 
Last edited: