It is dark. The "call on the field" is "Kings sold to Seattle". It will take a hell of a lot to flip it imo. The default, the easier course, is to uphold the sale. So somehow KJ has to rally 16 guys to take a radical activist position and say no to the deal. Why would a typical NBA owner do that? Much easier to shrug at KJ and say "sorry man, tough break".
We're talking "down 4, at the free throw line with 2.5 seconds on the clock type of underdog now. I honestly can't see what story KJ can tell that will be compelling enough to get 16 no votes.
Please God let me be wrong.
We're talking "down 4, at the free throw line with 2.5 seconds on the clock type of underdog now. I honestly can't see what story KJ can tell that will be compelling enough to get 16 no votes.
Please God let me be wrong.
There are advantages to keeping the Kings in Sacramento, especially if the local ownership group proposal includes a iron-clad commitment to the new arena. I still believe that David Stern would much prefer to see the Kings in a new arena in Sacramento than have another messy move at the end of his reign as commissioner. Sacramento has done EVERYTHING the league asked for and more. The Maloofs spit in the face of the NBA and David Stern. Do you really think he's going to make it easy for them in any of this?
Let's wait and see what/who Kevin Johnson comes up with. There may be a win/win in this all the way around ... for everyone but the Maloofs who will get the price they want for the team but not necessarily from the people they wanted to sell to.