Negatives of Kings vs Bulls game

Bibby_10

Bench
Ive got some negatives for ya!

1. Webber took way too many jump shots as usual. In the paint, where is that?
2. Bibby became Shaq at the free throw line.
3. The team forgot that they can actually attempt to stop the other team from scoring.
4. We lost to the Bulls, THE BULLS!
 
negatives, um we lost the game? theres a big negative! boo on the thread
 
I originally put this in the positive thread since IMO there was nothing positive about this game. Somehow it became its own thread.
 
4. We lost to the Bulls, THE BULLS!


The Bulls are a respectable team now. And just te tye of team that gives us trouble. Young. Quick. Athletic.

Other than that, I'll agree with you, B-10.
 
sometimes i wonder how many people actually watch NBA games. get your facts straight playa! its not the same bulls of years past. they have beaten decent teams before. you will see them in the playoffs.
 
SaCKiNgS24 said:
sometimes i wonder how many people actually watch NBA games. get your facts straight playa! its not the same bulls of years past. they have beaten decent teams before. you will see them in the playoffs.

I would love to see them again in the playoffs :) That would mean we would be playing them in the Finals.

Go Kings!!!
 
The Bulls are pretty good. They came into our house and beat us the last time we lost a game, they are dangerous.

Take away their 0-9 start and they are 25-14. Don't feel too bad, they will be a 2nd round playoff team in the East IMO.
 
i think they will make it to the eastern conference finals, where they will lose to miami.
 
the bulls had only 3 losses in january..

and they're # 1 in defensive FG%..

we are the better team, we just didn't show it last night..
 
4. We lost to the Bulls, THE BULLS!

heheh....you have to be kidding me ...right?? :rolleyes:

Yeah we are a better team....offensively. The Bulls play tough D, and guess what the D will always prevail. If the Bulls are somehow able to cut down on TO then watch out for them in the playoffs...
 
BullKing said:
4. We lost to the Bulls, THE BULLS!

heheh....you have to be kidding me ...right?? :rolleyes:

Yeah we are a better team....offensively. The Bulls play tough D, and guess what the D will always prevail. If the Bulls are somehow able to cut down on TO then watch out for them in the playoffs...

Bulls are a pretty good team. They started out 0-9 and since then have been 25-14....not too shabby.
 
The Bulls, THE BULLS is kinda like the plane boss THE PLANE. I know they're a pretty good team, but still I would have put my money on the Kings.
 
lets not be ridiculous...Mike hasn't been shooting well from line lately...but he still is NO SHAQ....Shaq is a bad FT shooter...Mike is a good FT going through a slump...there is a difference

and i for one hate to look at the negatives...im with bdub on this...im a glass is half full kind of person
 
I said Bibby became Shaq at the line (meaning he missed both free throws). So at that moment he was Shaq. I didnt say he was Shaq. Read more carefully.
 
Bibby_10 said:
I said Bibby became Shaq at the line (meaning he missed both free throws). So at that moment he was Shaq. I didnt say he was Shaq. Read more carefully.

shaq actually makes his free throws when he needs to, so there is no real comparison.
 
kingsfannPDX said:
shaq actually makes his free throws when he needs to, so there is no real comparison.

Oh, so you are buying the big crappola's line huh? Good lord -- just because a buffoon repeats something ad nauseam does not make it true.
 
it cracks me up whenever shaq says that...."i make them when a need to" whenver i hear him say that i follow with my usual line "you always need to"

i find him to be very amusing a lot of people to share that same sentiment...but i find him to be pretty funny like 60-70% of the time
 
Last edited:
Bricklayer said:
Oh, so you are buying the big crappola's line huh? Good lord -- just because a buffoon repeats something ad nauseam does not make it true.

look at stats and watch his games. as much as i hate him... he does make them when it counts. game 7 at arco ring any bells???
 
why are we comparing shaq to bibby? cub scout to shrek? what is wrong with u people? bibby can get a whole sentence out without mumbling 80 times!
 
SaCKiNgS24 said:
why are we comparing shaq to bibby? cub scout to shrek? what is wrong with u people? bibby can get a whole sentence out without mumbling 80 times!

that really made me laugh

that cub scout line does it everytime
 
kingsfannPDX said:
look at stats and watch his games. as much as i hate him... he does make them when it counts. game 7 at arco ring any bells???

Well...

According to 82games.com the Big Lardbucket makes him when he needs to to the tune of a hefty 44.2% in the clutch this year, after a sterling 43.6% last year, and a dominant 58.5% in 02-03.

He's also a 51.8% career FT shooter in the playoffs. His best postseason was in fact 01-02 when he shot 64.9%. Last year, He-Who-Makes-them-When-He-Needs-To shot a beautiful 42.9% in the playoffs.

Don't believe all the hot air coming out of that windbag,.
 
Bricklayer said:
Well...

According to 82games.com the Big Lardbucket makes him when he needs to to the tune of a hefty 44.2% in the clutch this year, after a sterling 43.6% last year, and a dominant 58.5% in 02-03.

He's also a 51.8% career FT shooter in the playoffs. His best postseason was in fact 01-02 when he shot 64.9%. Last year, He-Who-Makes-them-When-He-Needs-To shot a beautiful 42.9% in the playoffs.

Don't believe all the hot air coming out of that windbag,.

what you don't believe the "big aristotle" hahahahahahahahaha

yeah, i guess his stats aren't really showing that he does make them when he needs to. do you remember the 2000 WCF when the blazers used the "hack-a-shaq" method? didn't really work for the blazers. shaq made 9 in a row at one point. and i do remember some very clutch foul shooting against some team in 2002 WCF. but whatever, shaq always steps over the line (which last time i checked, is a violation) and our good ol' buddies never seem to call it. instead they like to give him more chances by calling lane violations on the opposing team.
 
Bibby_10 said:
I said Bibby became Shaq at the line (meaning he missed both free throws). So at that moment he was Shaq. I didnt say he was Shaq. Read more carefully.

I read this as carefully as I possibly could, but it only made my brain hurt.

:confused:
 
GoGoGadget said:
I read this as carefully as I possibly could, but it only made my brain hurt.

:confused:

whats hes trying to say is that SaCKiNgS24 is a pimp. true story.
 
Back
Top