[Grades] Grades v. Wizards 3/22/2015

So...

  • Yay, without reservation

    Votes: 24 47.1%
  • Yay...but our draft position?

    Votes: 14 27.5%
  • Yay...but uhoh here comes the junkball

    Votes: 6 11.8%
  • Boo, our draft position means more now

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • Boo, glad we won, but it will only encourage a junkball future

    Votes: 4 7.8%
  • Boo, without reservation

    Votes: 2 3.9%

  • Total voters
    51
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#1


Hey, a blowout even. Don't remember the last one of those, although I know we've had 1 or 2 this season. The Wizards are a sucky road team, and we jumped on them from the opening tip and really the game was never in doubt, Cuz on the court or not (and due to fouls, mostly he was not). Rudy continued his offensive prolific March, Omri excelled, DWill got to do his dunk thing a few more times, Ben remained a mystery (0pts first half, 17pt second half), Ray had moments. Most people did. It all went down pretty easily, and was defined by, gulp, run, gun, race up and down the court and get whatever you get in the open court. And of course the reason why this wasn't just another Karl era loss was because instead of losing the game 116-109, for the second game in a row we played some defense and won 109-86 instead.


Boxscore

Stats: 32min 26pts (10-19, 2-5, 4-4) 5reb 2ast 0stl 1blk 1TO
Gay ( A ) -- killed it again offensively as he has been all month. Of more importance perhaps, while I listed Casspi as the PF here, and the Wizards treated him that way and had Nene guard him, Gay himself is now referring to himself as a PF, which makes me throw up in my mouth a lot. And while the assignments seemed to switch around play to play on several early possessions there he was bodying up Nene, or later on even Gortat. And really it barely came back to bite us beyond not having any rebounding, which is something that will be much more of a problem in future games than it was in this one. The Wizards were flaccid on offense, even when their big guys did try to post up it was 15 feet from the hoop rather than doing the obvious walk the SF down under the hoop thing, and all in all we had few issues. It really wasn't terrbly responsible for Rudy's offensive effectiveness, as the Wizards used their power forward on Casspi (who did respond with a big run), and Rudy's offensive flow was more the result of him being in a great rhythm, and Paul Pierce makes Dre look like a spry young thang. And so Rudy bombed threes, and drove the lane at will, and crossed people over, and it all looked easy as could be as he cruised around out there.

Stats: 32min 14pts (4-6, 2-2, 4-4) 2reb 5ast 3stl 0blk 3TO
Casspi ( B+ ) -- this was a starters game for us, and for the first time since Paul Westphal was here that group is including Omri. And in the first half, the first quarter in particular, it was an Omri explosion early helped establish the tone for this one. He was very active and mobile right from the start which threw Nene off balance, and over the course of 1:10 he poured in 8 quick points on back to back threes, and then a little pullup. Now the run did not continue, and at that point the Wizards were still hanging right with us, but somehow it felt like a manifesto. He'd add 4 more points in the second quarter, and other than a couple of well intentioned but headslapping pass attempt turnovers, combined with DWill to turn the pow...other forward position into a an athletic pace pushing terror in the first half. While he'd only score 2 more points after half, Omri continued to grease the offense with unselfish passes. The boardwork wasn't there, and Nene eventually banged his way into roughly equivalent numbers, but most of that wasn't against Omri. For Omri himself it was one of he more dynamic games we've gotten out of the "other" forward position in some time.

Stats: 23min 20pts (6-11, 0-0, 8-8) 7reb 5ast 3stl 0blk 5TO
Cousins ( B- ) -- games like this are exceedingly hard to grade. It took Cuz all of 23 minutes to rack up 20pts 7reb 5ast 3stl...and 5TO. The dominance featured a 3-4 minute burst at the beginning of some of the worst Cuz play we have seen since the Keith Smart era, which was hardly a surprise as he was being used int he same manner, catching the ball out above the 3pt circle and trying to create, standing in the corner so as not to get in the way of all those other HOF teammates of his etc. So really he put up 20pts 7reb 5ast in about 20min of action. And once he made his first appearance inside, he was off and running. The problem was once again fouls, and legit fouls. Just as he was out of control early, he had regressed into over gambling on defense. It stopped his early run, it took him away again in the 2nd quarter when he was half a second late trying to take a charge on Wall, and when he resumed HOF level play in the third, it was one more time fouls that ended another dominant run, which included a highlight reel crossover on Nene, and another halfcourt running bounce pass to Ben for a racing layup. When he got back on the floor the rout was in full effect, and he contented himself with racking up assists as everybody got involved. So you have 2/3 of a great game here, with an ugly beginning. And the short night was largely his own fault. Gradewise that's...probably just an average night for Cuz. For some guys a night like this would be the best they ever do. For Cuz, he's had 30 better games this year. Still a big help while he was there to help.

Stats: 31min 17pts (7-11, 3-5, 0-0) 3reb 1ast 4stl 0blk 2TO
McLemore ( B- ) -- and this remains a mystery. Ben came into this one off of 4 clunkers in a row, and he started right off clunking again. He missed all his early shots, again lost minutes to Stauskas, and in this one Beal showed up for a while. On defense Ben was still going under screens, turning his head and being late on closeouts, and at halftime Ben was sitting on 0pts, he'd lost half his minutes again, and your're just shaking your head, do SOMETHING. And then the 3rd quarter opens up, and while these things came in the flow, including a brilliant half court bounce bass from Cuz to a streaking Ben on the break, I was reminded of nothing quite so much as that game 3 or 4 games into the season when Malone specifically had us run play after play for Ben in the early going and all of a sudden Ben woke up. His confidence is like a Hot Wheels car with a sticky axle. As long as you push it, it is neat to play with, as soon as you let go inertia takes over and soon its at a dead stop again. Well in the third quarter we pushed, we ran, Ben got out on the break, and boom, there came another one of his bursts of confidence. Suddenly he was hitting his threes, he got an oop out on the break from DWill long after DWill got his own, Beal and Wall completely disappeared, and we just ran them off the court. Some of Ben's 17 came in the late garbagetime, but it was still again another stark and mysterious tale of two halves. In one the guy's on the way out of the league. In the other the guy's a future star. Casino's must love Ben, gambling addiction is largely based on the brain's inability to accurately weigh the occasional high against the consistent lows. That's Ben. Next game he could score 20 or he could score 3, and neither would be a surprise. I'm splitting the difference between the halves.

Stats: 30min 13pts (5-9, 1-2, 2-2) 2reb 6ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
McCallum ( B ) -- there was no need of an old man to the rescue in this one, as Wall never really did come to play, and in the 2nd half in particular Ray flat outplayed him. He was efficient, rarely pressured, and when Wall did and Ray got around him, there was almost no rotation at all by the Wizards' bigs. Perhaps more important, Ray never let selfishness get in the way of the team here. Once or twice he did his tunnel vision thing, where you could just tell he was going to dribble around until he got his forced shot off, but there was no stretch of out of control play. In fact when he sat down for the first time he had all of 2pts 2ast and we were winning with him just directing the ball to Cuz or Gay and playing his role. At halftime he still had a 1 to 1 pts/ast ratio. And when he did turn it on offensively after half it was mostly efficient and with no answer from Wall it contributed to our blowing them out. Defensively there were still some issues not staying close to shooters on the perimeter, but their shooters weren't shooting, and Wall, who torched us last time, never did get on track from anywhere on the court. Ray might have been at most our #4 guy in this one, but it was an efficient #4 who's contributions came without an asterisk. Everything he did this time was in the flow and worked.
 
Last edited:

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#2
Bench

Stats: 22min 2pts (1-6, 0-2, 0-0) 0reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Stauskas ( D ) -- and games like this is why I think we really do need a steady move at the SG spot this offseason. Ben didn't show up for a half, then he shows up big. Nik came out looking like he wanted to show up, made a big aggressive drive, got swatted by like 10 people as the entire Wizards roster rushed back to swarm it, and never did end up getting anything done at all. And in fact on defense for the first time in a while we saw him struggling. If we're going to try to win next year we can't have guys showing up for one half every 5 games, or struggling to dive, then diving into the abyss. Just a nice steady Vinny Del Negro type would do it for us. 10-12 a night, hit open shots, help with the distributing and ballhandling. Nik's recent strides toward being that sort of dependable guy took a step back tonight. The only reason I'm not giving him the F the numbers say he would get is because if you watched him he still looked steadier, he was making better decisions, and of course we won. So I'll gentleman's D it and say he was a competent NBA player who just had a crap night.

Stats: 18min 8pts (3-6, 0-0, 2-3) 3reb 3ast 0stl 1blk 2TO
Williams ( B+ ) -- best of the benchers this time. The offensive fireworks were early in this one, as he just came in off the bench and immediately greeted the Wizards with a huge alley oop +1 from Rudy. After hitting a jumper in the early 2nd he would again take a real nice pass from Cuz for another big dunk (he also was the cause of a turnover in the 3rd when somebody, I think maybe McCallum, stopped our break to try to hit him with a 3/4 court alley oop pass -- just too damn tempting). Things quieted down after that, and while as it was with Casspi the Wizards were still standing after the fireworks, it just felt like those were early tonesetting performances and the eventually blowout was already being prepped. The reason for the good grade here though isn't a couple of dunks. You know how many of our 109pts were scored on DWill dunks? 4. 4pts of 109. They gave us some highlights, but they didn't make our game. But the thing was that DWill was more than just dunks this time out. He set several guys up for assists, including Ben for his own baby oop in the 4th. He did grab a few rebounds. And he was very solid on defense, challenging everything I saw, and even coming up with a rare for him block inside using his hops. He was only explosive for a couple of early minutes, but he was solidly good throughout.

Stats: 13min 3pts (1-2, 0-0, 1-2) 4reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Thompson ( C- ) -- almost completely irrelevant as Cuz's backup, and probably outplayed by Seraphin early. In the second half I wasn't sure, but may have drawn Karl's ire after Gortat got a layup, as JT had only been in the game for about 2 minutes replacing Cuz when abruptly he was yanked as well for Reggie.

Stats: 18min 6pts (3-7, 0-1, 0-0) 2reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Miller ( C- ) -- not this time for the old man, and maybe the Wiz just know him too well. then again, as most of the damage against him was done by Sessiosn, who was traded for him, maybe that wasn't it at all. He got a couple of little hits near the end of the first against Sessions (as we all know that's tough to do), and that was almost it for him. i ahve no reason to particularly give him a failing grade here, but McCalum was probably more effective in both halves this time.

Stats: 15min 0pts (0-2, 0-0, 0-0) 5reb 1ast 2stl 0blk 1TO
Evans ( B- ) -- you know, Reggie only grabebd 5rbes in his 15min a night, whihc is only about an 11reb per 36min pace, which is obviously far below his standards and within the reach of mere boarding mortals. But on the other hand he played a solid contributing game in there, slapping at balls and scooping them up, he made 2 great passes to a backcutting Ray to beat Sessions (only got 1 assist because Ray got fouled on the second one). In a game style that can too often forget about dirtworkers, Reggie seemed right at home.

Stats: 5min 0pts (0-0, 0-0, 0-0) 0reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Hollins ( INC ) -- got some PT while the game was still on due to the Cuz foul trouble. Did nothing. Literally.

Stats: 2min 0pts (0-0, 0-0, 0-0) 1reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Landry ( INC ) -- now a $6mil garbagetime player
 
Last edited:

kingsboi

Hall of Famer
#5
It's been a dunk fest these last two games for this team. Ben looked miserable in that first half, having no clue who to defend or how to defend. Second half he decided to show up and play, it's like playing a ouija board game with him. When I watch Ray play out there...it looks to me like watching a headless chicken throw the ball at the backboard with no intent on scoring or using the glass or floater. Casspi gives you both good and bad and I don't care much for him starting but Karl feels that JT or Carl no longer suffice so let's just roll with that. Gay has been nothing but incredible since the hiring, on offense at least.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
#7
DWill played great despite his box score. Same goes for stauskas I think he's figured it out, it's all about shots dropping and getting his weight up
???? Stauskas just went 1-6. Had a nice fake 3 dribble drive to the hoop and then got his shot blocked by like 8 people. Had a nice interior pass to Reggie Evans and of course Evans couldn't finish or Nik would have had one assist. Had another nice drive that was rejected. He hasn't figured out that he can't drive into traffic and finish against bigs yet...or maybe ever. Dribble drive and dish and then floaters in the paint. I'd like to see that from him.....and of course, knocking down the open 3's.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#8
???? Stauskas just went 1-6. Had a nice fake 3 dribble drive to the hoop and then got his shot blocked by like 8 people. Had a nice interior pass to Reggie Evans and of course Evans couldn't finish or Nik would have had one assist. Had another nice drive that was rejected. He hasn't figured out that he can't drive into traffic and finish against bigs yet...or maybe ever. Dribble drive and dish and then floaters in the paint. I'd like to see that from him.....and of course, knocking down the open 3's.
I think a lot of Nik's driving, which is generally a good thing but..., and Mr. Ben's occasional wild rides as well, are directly the results of Karl. Remember, this is a dribble drive offense, and Karl was a PG and wouldn't know a post player if it bit him. So he's clearing Cuz to the ****ing corner so the rest of our putzes have clear lanes to drive. And so they're trying, whether its a part of the game they have any instincts for or not.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#10
Cuz rebounds have been low the past few games - any thoughts ? product of the system, clearing out driving lanes ?
Well in WSH it was tired legs. Here it was minutes (same opponent possibly too). But yes, a concern. Again I will note the system which is having a guy of his caliber run around the court like a chicken with his head cut off. I don't think George Karl knows how to coach a great big. He's so used to being at a disadvantage in there that he wants to junk up the whole game to disguise the fact his bigs guys suck. Except now he's got possibly the very best one in the league, and when you've got that sort of advantage you want to slow it down, feature that advantage, and let the big guy work.

I'm reminded of nobody quite so much as I am Keith Smart.
 
#13
Well in WSH it was tired legs. Here it was minutes (same opponent possibly too). But yes, a concern. Again I will note the system which is having a guy of his caliber run around the court like a chicken with his head cut off. I don't think George Karl knows how to coach a great big. He's so used to being at a disadvantage in there that he wants to junk up the whole game to disguise the fact his bigs guys suck. Except now he's got possibly the very best one in the league, and when you've got that sort of advantage you want to slow it down, feature that advantage, and let the big guy work.

I'm reminded of nobody quite so much as I am Keith Smart.
Seriously, you'd think we'd lost by 20 the way you talk.
 
K

KingMilz

Guest
#14
Great game by the boys, the small ball thing really worked 2night. I thought Cousins got a lot of easy one on one looks as well which is rare despite us playing with more "pace", he got a number of post ups where all he had to do was make a quick move to score.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#15
Seriously, you'd think we'd lost by 20 the way you talk.
You know Jamal, the reason I have spent a disproportionate part of my life being right is I really don't give an f whether I or we win or lose. The process, the principles, the game, does not care either. You understand them, and the game to game details don't matter. Make the right play once, you might win or lose. Make the right play 100 times in a row, and you will win in the end. The here and now means little.

And yes btw, we'll eventually win games under Karl after he gets enough junkballers in here. But then again, you know, Keith won some games too. Get a weak opponent, some tired legs, hey, who cares how it happens right? Its still the same setup. Get the big guy out of the way so all my little guards can run at the hoop. If he wants to run at the hoop too, cool. Now everybody make sure to run on back and try to stop the inevitable runs the other way. But don't worry too much if one or two get through just as long as you press it back the other way. Then we can get down to the games that matter, have a serious team cut the legs out from under us as has happened to every Karl team ever since he became a stat padder, and we'll lose, and sit around talking about next year because oh we are so talented, and hey, just look at all our stats if you don't believe me.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#16
Won nicely. And two in a row for the first time in forever. Encouraging to see. Let's do some more.
Philly next, on our home floor this time. In general I would guess the 3rd quarter collapses are a road or tough team at home phenomenon. At home vs. Philly there is no way they should have the talent to beat us.
 
#18
You know Jamal, the reason I have spent a disproportionate part of my life being right is I really don't give an f whether I or we win or lose. The process, the principles, the game, does not care either. You understand them, and the game to game details don't matter. Make the right play once, you might win or lose. Make the right play 100 times in a row, and you will win in the end. The here and now means little.

And yes btw, we'll eventually win games under Karl after he gets enough junkballers in here. But then again, you know, Keith won some games too. Get a weak opponent, some tired legs, hey, who cares how it happens right? Its still the same setup. Get the big guy out of the way so all my little guards can run at the hoop. If he wants to run at the hoop too, cool. Now everybody make sure to run on back and try to stop the inevitable runs the other way. But don't worry too much if one or two get through just as long as you press it back the other way. Then we can get down to the games that matter, have a serious team cut the legs out from under us as has happened to every Karl team ever since he became a stat padder, and we'll lose, and sit around talking about next year because oh we are so talented, and hey, just look at all our stats if you don't believe me.
The hilarious part about this is that we played the exact same defense that we did against the Clippers: all our guys played close to the basket, were active in disrupting the passing lanes, and created enough traffic to prevent people from attacking the basket. I said it was nice to see that effort in that game, and also pointed out that this strategy gives the other team more open looks, but that with DC out we can't actually defend on the perimeter with our personnel anyways. You laughed it off and acted like the team didn't play any defense whatsoever.

We shouldn't have been in the game against the Clippers, yet we were and they only beat us by hitting 45% from 3. We play the EXACT SAME defense, Wiz are cold from the arc, and we blow them out.

For someone who doesn't claim to be results oriented, it's becoming pretty clear that you either don't understand the process or are willfully ignoring it so that you can keep bashing this team at every opportunity
 

Tetsujin

The Game Thread Dude
#19
The hilarious part about this is that we played the exact same defense that we did against the Clippers: all our guys played close to the basket, were active in disrupting the passing lanes, and created enough traffic to prevent people from attacking the basket. I said it was nice to see that effort in that game, and also pointed out that this strategy gives the other team more open looks, but that with DC out we can't actually defend on the perimeter with our personnel anyways. You laughed it off and acted like the team didn't play any defense whatsoever.

We shouldn't have been in the game against the Clippers, yet we were and they only beat us by hitting 45% from 3. We play the EXACT SAME defense, Wiz are cold from the arc, and we blow them out.

For someone who doesn't claim to be results oriented, it's becoming pretty clear that you either don't understand the process or are willfully ignoring it so that you can keep bashing this team at every opportunity
Which is fine and dandy when you're playing perimeter inept teams like the Bobcats and Wizards.

Letting other teams shoot open threes all night generally isn't going to win you very many games.
 
#20
What won this game was hustle, hustle, scrap, scrap every possession all the time. One of the best Kings games I have ever seen! And that's with Cousins having a bad game. But did you see that passing? Cousins looking like Vlade out there. I mean Rudy Gay off the fricken hook! Ben hitting some shots. Stauskas had a moment. We are seeing team development. I'm stoked! My only concern is cousins demeanor on court seems, not great. Not sure what to think of it. I hope he is alright.
 
#21
You know Jamal, the reason I have spent a disproportionate part of my life being right is I really don't give an f whether I or we win or lose. The process, the principles, the game, does not care either. You understand them, and the game to game details don't matter. Make the right play once, you might win or lose. Make the right play 100 times in a row, and you will win in the end. The here and now means little.

And yes btw, we'll eventually win games under Karl after he gets enough junkballers in here. But then again, you know, Keith won some games too. Get a weak opponent, some tired legs, hey, who cares how it happens right? Its still the same setup. Get the big guy out of the way so all my little guards can run at the hoop. If he wants to run at the hoop too, cool. Now everybody make sure to run on back and try to stop the inevitable runs the other way. But don't worry too much if one or two get through just as long as you press it back the other way. Then we can get down to the games that matter, have a serious team cut the legs out from under us as has happened to every Karl team ever since he became a stat padder, and we'll lose, and sit around talking about next year because oh we are so talented, and hey, just look at all our stats if you don't believe me.

I would be just as angry if they went this route, but in this game they didn't do that. This wasn't junkball, it just wasn't. In the 2nd half he went to Cousins and allowed him to face up in mid post position and put him in many of the positions where he's most effective. This team didn't blindly lob shots all over the court while ignoring Cousins. If that starts to happen I'll be complaining right with you, but it didn't happen this go around. We've seen some of that previous to this game so we should know what it looks like. Karl went out of his way in the 2nd half to involve Cousins.

Now that Cousins has turned into such an interior presence defensively I think the Kings can get away with going small over a lot of other teams that have done it in the past. Literally the only position they went "small" at was PF and doing so will help this team do a lot of the things it needs to on both ends.
 
#22
If Kings and Wizards shoot their normal percentages from outside the arc, and Wizards have legs to be even in transition, this is a close game going to the wire. Defensive effort was nice, but Boogie will die by the ASG, if Karl insists on playing at such a pace next season. It's nice to push the limits to get a grip, how team might perform in such circumstances, but in PO tempo is controlled and transition is cut off, plus in the West only teams with good outside shooting advance to PO, which destroys current defensive system. Would be nice to get to PO, but such a setup is not going any further.
 
#23
If Kings and Wizards shoot their normal percentages from outside the arc, and Wizards have legs to be even in transition, this is a close game going to the wire. Defensive effort was nice, but Boogie will die by the ASG, if Karl insists on playing at such a pace next season. It's nice to push the limits to get a grip, how team might perform in such circumstances, but in PO tempo is controlled and transition is cut off, plus in the West only teams with good outside shooting advance to PO, which destroys current defensive system. Would be nice to get to PO, but such a setup is not going any further.
How about having one of the best half court scoring options for the moments, when the tempo is actually controlled and transition is cut off?
Isn't it the case, that an offense, which relies on one player in certain situations, is controlled too in the PO? Teams have taken away the low post for DMC even in the regular season. Karl is going to experiment for the rest of the season. Going small against one of the better, bigger frontcourts of the east was risky, but it payed off. Nothing wrong with trying something different when the games don't count anymore.
The way I see it, Indiana was the only team slowing it down on purpose and playing a half court dominant offense, that managed to get deep into the playoffs in 2014. And they had all kinds of trouble with the depleted Hawks in the first round, cause they couldn't handle the floor spacing of the Hawks well enough.
In the playoffs it's all about adapting to the opponent and taking what the defense gives you. Slowing it down at all costs doesn't necessarily result in PO success.


What was the last team, that won the championship with a smashmouth, low post oriented, halfcourt approach? Just curious, how this question is answered on this board.
Detroit 2004 (not really about low post, but very intense on defense)? San Antonio? Lakers?
 
#24
You know Jamal, the reason I have spent a disproportionate part of my life being right is I really don't give an f whether I or we win or lose. The process, the principles, the game, does not care either. You understand them, and the game to game details don't matter. Make the right play once, you might win or lose. Make the right play 100 times in a row, and you will win in the end. The here and now means little.

And yes btw, we'll eventually win games under Karl after he gets enough junkballers in here. But then again, you know, Keith won some games too. Get a weak opponent, some tired legs, hey, who cares how it happens right? Its still the same setup. Get the big guy out of the way so all my little guards can run at the hoop. If he wants to run at the hoop too, cool. Now everybody make sure to run on back and try to stop the inevitable runs the other way. But don't worry too much if one or two get through just as long as you press it back the other way. Then we can get down to the games that matter, have a serious team cut the legs out from under us as has happened to every Karl team ever since he became a stat padder, and we'll lose, and sit around talking about next year because oh we are so talented, and hey, just look at all our stats if you don't believe me.
You know Brick, I have to say I scan over a lot of comments to get to yours because I respect what you have to say for the most part. I think you usually have a very well thought out and intelligent response to most any question. But in this case, I'm not sure you are making much sense. You literally just compared arguably one of the best coaches EVER to Keith Smart. Are you kidding me? Now we can debate style all you want, but that is just flat out wrong.

Let me say I agree with you that it appears to me that Boogie is not being used properly, but then I look every night and he's still killing people. The only thing getting in his way is his own head. At the beginning of the season I watched him and thought "wow, he's really getting it" in regards to officials and calls. He has regressed, possibly to even as bad as 2 years ago. I know he's been jerked around by this front office and all, but if he wants to be the leader he says he is, then shut up and play ball. His teammates need him on the floor.....I think that's been easily proven. So, he needs to just move on to the next play and just kill opponents.
 
P

PoundForPound

Guest
#25
Masterful performance by Rhudini, as I predicted, he is just a marvelous basketball player. Perfect basketball body. His fluid stroke is smooth and silky like the rivers of babylon, that's the Gay I want to see.
 
#26
I really hope we win the lottery. Not really for the fact that we'll get Towns (although I am really excited about that possibility), but for the fact that it will force Karl to play two legitimate big men in the starting lineup.

Maybe then he'll stop tailoring this team to guards and roleplaying wings, and he'll build a system around Cousins, Towns, and Gay...
 
#27
Which is fine and dandy when you're playing perimeter inept teams like the Bobcats and Wizards.

Letting other teams shoot open threes all night generally isn't going to win you very many games.
Except that it worked in both games.

I also was not advocating that we do this every game, merely that it was a smart strategy in both games, and was well executed. I thought this was obvious but based on the garbage that people are posting here I guess it's not, so I'll explain:

Clippers: we were missing both Cuz and DC, meaning we were going to have to get creative no matter what. The Clippers interior assault relies on a lot of creative passing to their bigs, as well as drives from their guards. Without Cousins, our interior defense is already weak, so stacking the middle makes sense (the team had a far better chance of cutting of entry passes than it did of defending the Clips down low). They are a great 3 point shooting team, but between Paul, JJ, and apparently Hedo, we weren't going to run them off the line. Collison + Ben would give us the luxury of using our two guards to contain Paul on the perimeter, but one good screen and it falls apart with Ben alone (whereas otherwise DC is a good enough defender to pick up the assignment). If you put Ben out on Paul with his only help being Dre, Nik, or Ray, some very bad things are going to happen.

In this scenario, the right decision is to double down on the interior and force the Clips to beat you from 3. They did, but they shot 45% (an anomaly for team 3 even with the perimeter left relatively open) and they STILL had a fight on their hands well into the 4th. It worked.

Against the Wiz the strategy obviously worked because they can't shoot three.

Going in to next season I don't expect this to be a staple defense, since we will have our full defensive perimiter platoon, but this was a nice adjustment by a HoF coach with a short handed roster.

It also was a strategy used by Gregg Popovich in the NBA finals, by the way.
 
#28
Thoughts:

* This was a fun game to watch, primarily because it showed the team stepping up and playing well together like we haven;t seen since the beginning of the year. Yes, it hurts the draft order, but it strongly suggests (to me) that this team isn't nearly as bad as they've been playing since firing Malone.
The conspiracy theorist in me asks, "How the hell can this team, with no change in players, possibly play this well, with solid role-players, but stink it up most every other game?"
It just doesn't make sense that everything can click one night, and then be Three Stooges bad most of the other nights. Something else is going on with this team, this year, other than just sheer talent/fit/coaching/execution, etc.
I still maintain that most nights, this team (mostly the FO) doesn't want to win the game. That's the biggest problem this year. When the shackles come off, and everyone wants (is allowed) to win, they get nights like tonight.

* When the Kings have a good game, the smart analyst will be just as critical pointing out things that should be fixed, or alarming observations, etc.
This delusional panacea that most KF's display whenever they have a good win, is frankly embarrassing.
Y'all act like if a tyrannical leader abused you for months, and then one day threw you some crusts of bread and handfuls of rice, you'd start to praise the leader for his benevolence.

* Some games are just like this for Boogie - the ball doesn't bounce his way. I've watched his low-rebound games closely, and they happen when he's in the right place for a rebound, but (almost every shot) the ball either clangs far away or it goes in. Some nights he just has opposite magnetic polarity for the ball.
The second Evans gets subbed in, the other team misses their shots and the ball is bouncing right into his hands.
But it IS quite worrisome for Demarcus to be removed from the offensive rebounding equation. He should almost NEVER be standing near the 3-pt line on the opposite side of the court from the ball. That's just a questionable waste of ORBD opportunities.

* Many people are buying this Derrick Williams act.
DON'T.
The second he gets a long-term contract, you can say goodbye to him being a benefit on the court.
Guy proved his approach to the game over the past 4 years - that's not going to change.
He's currently desperate to get paid next year - all he cares about is money and the cush NBA life, and the guy is so dumb he waited THIS LONG to try on the court. Do not let his act fool you, like short-memoried fans.
(Again) He's fool's gold.
 
#29
* Many people are buying this Derrick Williams act.
DON'T.
The second he gets a long-term contract, you can say goodbye to him being a benefit on the court.
Guy proved his approach to the game over the past 4 years - that's not going to change.
He's currently desperate to get paid next year - all he cares about is money and the cush NBA life, and the guy is so dumb he waited THIS LONG to try on the court. Do not let his act fool you, like short-memoried fans.
(Again) He's fool's gold.
I tend to agree with you, but for argument's sake, let's consider the teammates he has played with primarily over that time. There were times in Minnesota when he looked like a legitimate player. Not a good player by any means, but a guy who can finish looks. I will have to look to see how much of that came from playing with Rubio who was hurt about 75% of Williams' time in Minny. You saw some of the same stuff early on when the Kings got him when he was finishing lobs and looks from Vasquez, but that went away when the primary passers became IT and Jimmer.

Now that he is playing with a pass-first guy again he is looking more comfortable on the offensive end. He doesn't have to make many decisions, just catch and dunk or catch and shoot. For the right price, those attributes could be useful.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#30
Masterful performance by Rhudini, as I predicted, he is just a marvelous basketball player. Perfect basketball body. His fluid stroke is smooth and silky like the rivers of babylon, that's the Gay I want to see.
Just finished watching the game. Was sick yesterday and slept right through it. Thank god for DVR's. One difference I've noticed in Rudy's game of late, is that he's not pounding the ball nearly as much. When he gets the ball, he either shoots, or passes. Not always, old habits die hard, but in general, he's still getting his shots without being as ball dominate.

I also don't think this was just a run and gun game. We went through a lot of half court sets, and if Cuz hadn't gotten into foul trouble, he certainly would have gotten more touches. He needs to be shown all the fouls, or non calls he bitches about. There is no bigger fan of Cousins than me, but I have to honest, it's starting to wear on me. Just shut the F up and play. I think the team tried to run when it was there, and unfortunately they also tried to run a few times when it wasn't there. But it's a learning process. They've definitely had better ball movement. Sometimes without purpose, but it's a good habit to get into. I'm curious to see if Casspi can maintain this level of play the rest of the season.