Bee: Maloofs gush over Brooks (merge)

#1
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/217558.html

Maloofs gush over Brooks

Kings assistant wows co-owners in second head-coaching interview
By Sam Amick - Bee Staff Writer

Published 12:00 am PDT Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1

LAS VEGAS -- It was only 10:45 a.m., and they were ready to ink a deal.

Not the Kings and their prospective head coach, but the nearly 20 people waiting outside a tattoo parlor in the same Palms Casino where Scott Brooks was hoping to inspire an inking of a whole different fashion.

Entering Brooks' second official interview Monday for the Kings' head-coaching position, some within the organization said the only obstacle between the assistant and his official promotion was the approval of team co-owners Joe and Gavin Maloof.

Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie knew Brooks on a much different level than the Maloofs and is known to think highly of the 41-year-old, making the top objective of this session to gauge the Maloofs' opinion. And if their reaction just after a nearly 90-minute lunch at the familiar 24/7 Café was any indication, consider Brooks endorsed.

"I felt terrific about it," Joe Maloof said as he stood wearing sunglasses just outside the casino's front doors. "He's not flashy, and he's got his feet squarely on the ground. He's a family man. He knows the game. He's got a lot of positives. He's pretty hard not to like."

Though Petrie is the clear point man for the coaching search that began with the April 20 firing of Eric Musselman, the Maloofs' influence remains. Candidates who have not garnered a comfort level with both Petrie and ownership have come and gone or never been interviewed, with the one apparent agreement ending when Stan Van Gundy bolted out of Sacramento to sign with Orlando. Yet Van Gundy's runaway act only strengthened Brooks' case, with the consensus that not only does Brooks -- unlike Van Gundy -- badly want the job, he is a known commodity who has unique credentials.

Before Brooks joined the Kings, his three seasons under George Karl in Denver had put him on the proverbial hot list of young coaches seemingly destined to be a head coach. Joe and Gavin Maloof cited Brooks' NBA playing experience that included playing under seven head coaches, and they said they're enamored with his ability to overachieve as a player despite lacking the size and skills of most of his colleagues.

The smallish Manteca native was cut by Philadelphia as a rookie and played in the American Basketball Association before surviving 11 seasons in the NBA. He played a key role in a championship with Houston in 1994.

"I don't like that about him -- I love it," Joe Maloof said. "I look at (Brooks), and I see a lot of Gavin and I. People have always underestimated our abilities throughout our lives, and we've overachieved. I see that in this guy."
Said Gavin Maloof: "How many guys told him he couldn't make the team, that he'd never play in the NBA? How many people told him that?"

With their feelings clear, the decision is clearly Petrie's to make.

"Basically, Geoff has to be the one who makes this decision," Joe Maloof said. "But Gavin and I interviewed (Brooks), and we felt very comfortable with him and he had a great interview. He was terrific. We need to talk to Geoff before we decide on anything."

Petrie said early Monday evening that he would talk with the Maloofs either later Monday night or today to decide what comes next. But beyond Brooks, there are no interviews scheduled with other candidates.

Just after 1 p.m., Brooks, Petrie and Joe and Gavin Maloof sat in the same red room in the back of the 24/7 Café where Los Angeles Lakers assistant Kurt Rambis was interviewed June 3. Brooks wore a light blue collared shirt, his suit jacket pulled off as they ate. A balloon floated near Brooks that read "Congratulations!" as a high school graduation party -- and perhaps some unintentional fortunetelling -- was taking place.

At 2:38 p.m., all four men rose and shook hands. Petrie and Brooks headed for the airport, and the Maloofs went to the high limit lounge. Having gambled and lost on Van Gundy, they might be making a safer bet this time.
"I know that our people in the organization know him, and they like him a lot," Joe Maloof said. "He has the respect of everybody within the organization. Today was very positive."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last time I heard them being this excited was over a powerpoint presentation :(

I think we can expect an announcement in the next couple of days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#2
"I know that our people in the organization know him, and they like him a lot," Joe Maloof said. "He has the respect of everybody within the organization. Today was very positive."
I think that's pretty telling...

I don't think there's anyone out there who is so much better than Scott Brooks that Petrie would look any further if he and the Maloofs are in agreement. If it's gonna be Scott Brooks, it works for me.

Now, let's look forward to the draft.

:)
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#5
Yep. I remember the last time the Maloofs gushed about a cute young little candidate who impressed them so as somebody just like them. Man am I filled with confidence.

Alright jackasses, if that's your boy that's your boy, but the gloves are off. You have looked incompetent for some time now, and this does nothing to change that opinion. You lost the guy you wanted, waited months to hire the cheapest most convenient and least accomplished option on the market that you could have hired the day after you canned your last young and cute disaster, and in general have looked like quite possibly the most indecisive, confused, and unambitious team this side of the similarly floundering Pacers. All I have to say is he'd better work out. And not "oh we won't fire him because it will make us look bad" work out. I mean work out. Because if he doesn't, there is no place to hide on this one.
 
#6
Well heck, life gives you lemons, you make lemonade. Life gives you Brooks as a head coach, you try to go forth and kick *** under his guidance.

It's not the worst thing that could have happened.

In this day and age that's quite an acceptable outcome for a Kings fan :rolleyes:
 
#9
Yep. I remember the last time the Maloofs gushed about a cute young little candidate who impressed them so as somebody just like them. Man am I filled with confidence.

Alright jackasses, if that's your boy that's your boy, but the gloves are off. You have looked incompetent for some time now, and this does nothing to change that opinion. You lost the guy you wanted, waited months to hire the cheapest most convenient and least accomplished option on the market that you could have hired the day after you canned your last young and cute disaster, and in general have looked like quite possibly the most indecisive, confused, and unambitious team this side of the similarly floundering Pacers. All I have to say is he'd better work out. And not "oh we won't fire him because it will make us look bad" work out. I mean work out. Because if he doesn't, there is no place to hide on this one.
All we need to do now is draft someone like Jeff Green and trade Artest for K-Mart and the off-season is off to a bright start.

I think we will be having the same discussion next year as well if Brooks is our coach. This coaching situation looks to be more and more amateurish with every passing day.
 
S

sactownfan

Guest
#10
i like it. although the maloofs were excited with muss last year i dont think Petrie was. this year clearly Petrie was more involved and if hes down with brooks than i am. no way Petrie lets the maloofs pick someone hes not down with this time. brooks has a chance to step in with little pressure to be a contender right away. and hey if we make the lottery again well its probably for the best it would only help our rebuild.
 

Spike

Subsidiary Intermediary
Staff member
#12
#13
Brooks is the man, i remember people saying last season that they would like to see him as head coach, well hopefully we see it...if worse comes to worst we will have another bad season and get another decent pick.
 
#14
I am good with this. Of the candidates left, he is far from the worst in my opinion. I'll admit that I really wanted Van Gundy, but Brooks was my second choice tied with Porter. Since it does not appear that we are going to interview Porter, I'll support this choice.
 
#15
as long as he lets our young guys run, i'm content with that. i don't want to see this fool try to win games with the vets if we are out of the playoff running like that chump muss. :rolleyes:
 
#16
didnt they also "gush" over musselman?

im all for giving him a chance but we were told the exact same thing a year ago
This is different- Last year, they gushed, Petrie stayed reserved. This year, Petrie has made it clear that he respects and gets along well with Brooks, and they seem to have a positive rapport.
 
#17
Hooboy. We're being spoon-fed Brooks so I guess eventually we'll have to swallow all this gushing and goo-gooing. Leftovers again. When are the Kings going to invite the fans over for substantial fare?
With no new arena in sight, maybe the Maloofs aren't willing to spring for Beluga and Lafitte. Here we go again, "Ya wanna go big on the fries?":rolleyes:
 
#18
With no new arena in sight, maybe the Maloofs aren't willing to spring for Beluga and Lafitte. Here we go again, "Ya wanna go big on the fries?":rolleyes:

I can be as hard on the Maloofs as anybody, but this just isn't fair. They had SVG on the brink of signing (or at least pretending to be) - it couldn't have been for peanuts.

The idea that the Maloofs are somehow "cheaping out" is bogus. There is no reason to assume Brooks is materially cheaper than Porter.
 

Spike

Subsidiary Intermediary
Staff member
#19
I can be as hard on the Maloofs as anybody, but this just isn't fair. They had SVG on the brink of signing (or at least pretending to be) - it couldn't have been for peanuts.

The idea that the Maloofs are somehow "cheaping out" is bogus. There is no reason to assume Brooks is materially cheaper than Porter.

You beat me to it. If you look at the list of available coaches, there wasn't much to be had, other than SVG, that would elicit a "wow" response from everyone. Personally, I would prefer Brooks over Porter, because I know what we're getting with Porter, but the mystery of what could be intrigues me.
 
#20
I can be as hard on the Maloofs as anybody, but this just isn't fair. They had SVG on the brink of signing (or at least pretending to be) - it couldn't have been for peanuts.

The idea that the Maloofs are somehow "cheaping out" is bogus. There is no reason to assume Brooks is materially cheaper than Porter.
"Bogus" is a rather strong word, dontacha think? It's certainly within the realm of possibility. Rebuilding years ahead, no new arena, no franchise player, very astute Maloof business minds...cheaping out may make complete biz-sense once the No. 1 choice fled town. Just maybe the Maloofs don't want to "go big" at this point. ;)
 
#21
You beat me to it. If you look at the list of available coaches, there wasn't much to be had, other than SVG, that would elicit a "wow" response from everyone. Personally, I would prefer Brooks over Porter, because I know what we're getting with Porter, but the mystery of what could be intrigues me.
You mean that same old mystery of what could be with Muss? :rolleyes:
 
#23
I'm not sold on Brooks as many of you guys are. And being in a rebuilding mode, I'm not looking forward to 25 game plus season either.

i dont think many of us are sold .. we're just accepting the fact that he may be the next head coach. what can we do? we're not the ones writing the checks...
 
#24
Curious to hear why the people out there think that Brooks couldn't turn out to be the next Avery Johnson. I am not saying he will, and he could easily turn out to be the next Doc Rivers or Isiah Thomas instead, but what makes people so sure he will fail. He comes from the same position as Johnson, has been talked about as a fine young assistant like Johnson, was a hard-nosed gritty player like Johnson, and seems to be well-respected by current players like Johnson. Johnson trained briefly under Pop, Brooks got some time under Karl.

Just curiosu why people are so SURE he won't work out. He seems to have a lot going for him, and since we have NOTHING to base his success/failure on (just like there was nothing to base Johnson's success/failure), I choose to keep an open mind...
 
#25
"Bogus" is a rather strong word, dontacha think? It's certainly within the realm of possibility. Rebuilding years ahead, no new arena, no franchise player, very astute Maloof business minds...cheaping out may make complete biz-sense once the No. 1 choice fled town. Just maybe the Maloofs don't want to "go big" at this point. ;)
Sorry but I just don't see who Brooks is "cheaper than" so to me it is not plausible as the Maloof's motive here.

Who would you have them "spend big" on? You think they really really would in their heart of hearts prefer to go with Carlesimo but are too cheap to pay his price tag? I don't buy it on several levels.
 
#26
No offense to Mr. Brooks. How can I get excited about mediocrity? :mad:

This franchise has years of rebuilding to go before it stands tall again.
 
#27
Sorry but I just don't see who Brooks is "cheaper than" so to me it is not plausible as the Maloof's motive here.

Who would you have them "spend big" on? You think they really really would in their heart of hearts prefer to go with Carlesimo but are too cheap to pay his price tag? I don't buy it on several levels.
Hey, you're potentially as right as JoMama. We're all guessing here. We certainly don't know what's going through the minds of Kings management/owners. Just posing the question and an opinion.
There are certainly bigger names, guys with head coaching experience, out there that would coach the Kings.
In NBA circles, Brooks is the minnow in the pond and therefore the least expensive alternative. If he implodes, it ain't gonna bankrupt the franchise. Hope you're right, hope he's the answer, hope the product is exciting. I really don't want to endure another season like that last Interstate pileup.
 
#28
History repeats itself?

Maloof's go ga-ga, gushing over Musselman in series of quotes announcing his hiring as coach of the Sacramento Kings:

"I know we're going to be the best-prepared team in the league now," owner Joe Maloof told The Associated Press in a phone interview Friday night. "We just like him a lot. We're really comfortable with the guy. Our whole family feels that way. He's a basketball a-holic."

The entire Maloof family felt a kinship with Musselman — particularly the four brothers who extended their father's business empire when George Maloof died. Musselman is the son of Bill Musselman, the late NBA coach who raised his family with game film on the television instead of cartoons in the mornings. "That was like our family," Joe Maloof said. "We talked all business at the table. His father died at a young age, just like our father. We were young guys when we took over our dad's business. We believe in youth. We believe young guys can get things done."

"I think we got one of the brilliant young minds in basketball today with Eric Musselman," said co-owner Joe Maloof from Sacramento.
 
#29
Well, I think Rick Adelman was clearly the best "available" NBA coach on the market this year. No need to say more about that. Furthermore, I assume that Eric Musselman failed in Sacramento because of the players at his disposal, especially the prima donnas that hated him.

Just so I can get on board, what is so special about Stan Van Gundy? Why is widely viewed here as vastly superior to Brooks or anyone else?

Please educate me. I'm pretty slow. I just recently concluded that Brickie was right about the stupidityr of beating the Clippers late in the season.

What is with Van Gundy?
 
#30
Well, I think Rick Adelman was clearly the best "available" NBA coach on the market this year. No need to say more about that. Furthermore, I assume that Eric Musselman failed in Sacramento because of the players at his disposal, especially the prima donnas that hated him.

Just so I can get on board, what is so special about Stan Van Gundy? Why is widely viewed here as vastly superior to Brooks or anyone else?

Please educate me. I'm pretty slow. I just recently concluded that Brickie was right about the stupidityr of beating the Clippers late in the season.

What is with Van Gundy?
quick dog - there were many posts regarding SVG on what people thought about him. Maybe you can do a search on it. However, it is pass. We are not getting SVG so why ask about him. Let's look into the future.