Bee: Kings ponder their plight

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/145348.html

Kings ponder their plight
Flashes of brilliance make them wonder why they couldn't sustain such play.
By Sam Amick - Bee Staff Writer
Last Updated 12:05 am PDT Wednesday, March 28, 2007


There is a Web site that cuts right to the chase of the NBA playoff race, deducing via complex mathematical equations what percentage chance each team has of making the postseason.

The latest Kings pulse entering play Tuesday -- according to www.coolstandings.com -- was 3.9 percent.

So if they do miss the playoffs for the first time in nine seasons, Sunday's nearly flawless victory over Phoenix and the handful of potent outings like it will raise one pertinent question inside the Kings' lair and among the team's followers: Where has this team been all season?

The Kings' 107-100 disposal of the Suns was impressive, from their 52.1 percent shooting to their grab-every-loose-ball mentality to the way they attacked the glass after being outrebounded for most of the past few months.

Afterward, the Kings themselves were asking that question.

"It's one of those things where it's like -- could we have been doing this all year?" swingman John Salmons said.

When looking back on this season that seems sure to come up short, it would be erroneous to think that personnel changes or injuries played the largest roles.

Unless there are those who believe Bonzi Wells could have fixed this (let alone Wells playing with long-term financial security), the roster had been -- at least on paper -- an improvement. Salmons was signed to be a utility talent and has drawn nothing but positive reviews, while third-year shooting guard Kevin Martin -- starting in Wells' spot -- has reached heights even those in the organization didn't foresee. Among other notable differences, Corliss Williamson went from a non-factor on the bench to a major contributor.

The Kings' late playoff run last season, in which they won 25 of their last 36 games, began with Wells out with a strained groin. With Martin in the starting lineup, the Kings had the same starting five they have featured for much of this season.

They went 8-3 in those games, followed by a 7-4 stretch when Wells returned and came off the bench and a 10-4 finish with Wells starting and Martin serving as the reserve.

Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie was at the forefront of those who entered the season feeling optimistic, contesting the claim that the loss of Wells was a significant setback.

"I don't know how it sets us back at all," Petrie said in late July. "It's going to be different. That doesn't mean it can't be the same or better."

Veteran coach Don Nelson, who landed with Golden State but was interested in the Sacramento post, said months after Petrie's assessment that the Kings' talent was a major attraction.

"I think they're as good as anybody in the West," Nelson said. "I think the Martin kid has given them four All-Star players, really. Once (injured center Brad) Miller gets back, I can't see anybody that's better than they are."

Miller was coming off a summer with Team USA and survived just 2 1/2 games before he experienced left foot problems that would plague him all season. He returned after eight games, and the Kings lost nine of their next 13 games.

Ron Artest missed six games in the first two months, with knee and back injuries bothering him -- not to mention the losing -- in what was only the beginning of his distraction-filled campaign.

Yet the injuries and absences have been a relative non-factor compared to the other teams jockeying for the eighth Western Conference playoff spot.

The Kings have missed a combined 52 games because of injury, illness, dismissal or personal reasons, close to Minnesota (72) but nowhere near as many as New Orleans (345), Golden State (188), Portland (172) and the Los Angeles Clippers (134).

Close games might very well doom the Kings. Beyond their 0-5 overtime record, they are 12-19 in games decided by seven points or fewer.

"That's probably the most discouraging thing right now," forward Shareef Abdur-Rahim said. "We probably should've taken care of enough business early where we'd be all right."

They handled their business Sunday, but closing time might be coming soon.

"I guess if we knew the answer to (the question of where this team has been all season), we'd have more of it," Petrie said this week. "It's been sort of the way we've played this year. We have games or short stretches where we sort of look like we've figured it all out, then we fall back into something else."

About the writer: The Bee's Sam Amick can be reached at samick@sacbee.com.
 
Am I the only one who finds it a little interesting that the entire article does not contain even one reference to Eric Musselman's arrival?
 
"I guess if we knew the answer to (the question of where this team has been all season), we'd have more of it," Petrie said this week. "It's been sort of the way we've played this year. We have games or short stretches where we sort of look like we've figured it all out, then we fall back into something else."

About the writer: The Bee's Sam Amick can be reached at samick@sacbee.com.


That's because, IMO, they replaced a good coach with a bad coach and when the team plays well they just show flashes of how they played with Adelman. It's when Musselman runs his offense that's a poor imitation of Rick's(like Sunday) when they play well. And the fact that this team just isn't that good. They're a bunch of mixed talents that don't actually mix well. Their games don't mesh on the court. There is nobody to provide rebounding or shotblocking. There is nobody to provide toughness. And even though we replaced Bonzi with a better player and a decent one we lost the qualities that he brought to our team when we were in short supply of them already. Not to mention Ron the Cancer Artest has had a very negative effect on us. That's why they have games where they look good and games where they look bad IMO.
 
Am I the only one who finds it a little interesting that the entire article does not contain even one reference to Eric Musselman's arrival?


you're not the only one! i would do anything. (almost) to see what our record would be with adelman. he's not the perfect coach, but i appreciate him so much more now.
 
Am I the only one who finds it a little interesting that the entire article does not contain even one reference to Eric Musselman's arrival?

Yeah, I think that's a little bizarre. It mentions losing Bonzi, who obviously performed very well for us last season, but doesn't mention, even in passing, that we also lost the coach that brought us to the playoffs 8 seasons in a row. Very odd.....
 
Everytime Marc Jackson commentates on one of the games he is spot on. He always talks about the talent this team has, yet they don't have anyone that can inspire them. They play uninspired basketball, and their talents are not exploited. He constantly takes pot-shots at Musselman for the way he's running this team. Just listening to him during the Suns game and the game against the Nets a while ago, he basically summed up what we've been saying all season.
 
Am I the only one who finds it a little interesting that the entire article does not contain even one reference to Eric Musselman's arrival?

No, that's very clear and since we are talking about the subject I think that is one of the main reasons why we are underachieving this year. Bad coaching and the players not respecting the short, young, and non NBA player Muss. We need a new head coach, Muss can be one of the assistants, and it would be nice to bring back Coachie as well...if only for KMart's further development, but he brings way more to everything.

Muss group of preppy frat boys aren't cutting it with the team both in the way of what they do/say and the lack of respect from the players.

Artest is hard to control and only a few coaches can do it: Riley, Jackson, Pop...maybe a few more, but a short, non NBA player, with great Power Point skills, and who yells at his players the whole game with bingo/battleship letter/number codes is not going to cut it!!!! :rolleyes:
 
You know, these are the articles...

Every single team in the league has "flashes". EVERY one. Its the NBA, and these are the best basketball players in the world. Memphis just had a "flash" last night. The Bobcats beat the Spurs earlier this season, in San Antonio mind you. Having "flashes" amongst otherwise uninspired play is the sine qua non of the bad team. Its what defines them as such, the same way as aging players routinely have one good game in five but can't sustain. There is nothing unique about our performance, and no solution to it other than to rebuild and become a not so bad team. But rising up once every two weeks to play a good game means exactly squat in the NBA, and its no magical indication that gee, we should be doing this every night. Its no more than the top end of our particular bell curve.
 
Last edited:
You know, these are the articles...

Every single team in the league has "flashes". EVERY one. Its the NBA, and these are the best basketball players in the world. Memphis just had a "flash" last night. The Bobcats beat the Spurs earlier this season, in San Antonio mind you. Having "flashes" amongst otherwise uninspired play is the sine qua non of the bad team. Its what defines them as such, the same way as aging players routinely have one good game in five but can't sustain. There is nothing unique about our performance, and no solution to it other than to rebuild and become a not so bad team. But rising up once every two weeks to play a good name means exactly squat in the NBA, and its no magical indication that gee, we should be doing this every night. Itsd no more than the top end of our particular bell curve.

outstanding brick!
 
You know, these are the articles...

Every single team in the league has "flashes". EVERY one. Its the NBA, and these are the best basketball players in the world. Memphis just had a "flash" last night. The Bobcats beat the Spurs earlier this season, in San Antonio mind you. Having "flashes" amongst otherwise uninspired play is the sine qua non of the bad team. Its what defines them as such, the same way as aging players routinely have one good game in five but can't sustain. There is nothing unique about our performance, and no solution to it other than to rebuild and become a not so bad team. But rising up once every two weeks to play a good name means exactly squat in the NBA, and its no magical indication that gee, we should be doing this every night. Itsd no more than the top end of our particular bell curve.

I agree 100%. Also, you need to take into account the bad play of the opposing team. We may have beat a few good teams this year but how many of those games did the other team play their A ball?
 
i dont even wanna see musselman as an assistant. <<pukes>>. get him off our bench

His Power Point presentations and stat analysis might be of some use to a head coach. But then again that coach might very well tell him to shove his stats and coach by the seat of his pants. You know not everything in life can be theoretical, you sometimes have to just forget that and just play and focus and finish out a game. The Kings have the worst 2nd 1/2 of games I have ever seen, especially the 3rd quarter where it would seem they are giving some sleeping pill in their Kool Aid. ;)
 
You know, these are the articles...

Every single team in the league has "flashes". EVERY one. Its the NBA, and these are the best basketball players in the world. Memphis just had a "flash" last night. The Bobcats beat the Spurs earlier this season, in San Antonio mind you. Having "flashes" amongst otherwise uninspired play is the sine qua non of the bad team. Its what defines them as such, the same way as aging players routinely have one good game in five but can't sustain. There is nothing unique about our performance, and no solution to it other than to rebuild and become a not so bad team. But rising up once every two weeks to play a good name means exactly squat in the NBA, and its no magical indication that gee, we should be doing this every night. Itsd no more than the top end of our particular bell curve.

Exactly, just about any team no matter how bad might find a way to beat the best team. It's the best teams that learn from their mistakes and focus and string together winning streaks not only on their home floor, but away as well. They also deal with players that are hurt and come out of time outs with a good set play that results in a basket or a stop on their end. They have a set plan and play to how they play best, they also have a arsenal of players to come off the bench that bring energy, but also don't drop much from the level of the starters, if they cannot be starters, they play inspired scrapy basketball and become the role players their teams need. Look at teams like the Texas teams especially Dallas & San Antonio, also Phoenix...they have guys that very well could/should be starters on just about any other team, but they accept their role and come off the bench and play their hearts out...players like this that come to mind are Ginobili, Josh Howard, Barbasa etc.
 
The Kings would have lost the fourth game with Phoenix had Bibby not had a career game with all those threes. Shooting like that is not normal. It was an extraordinary performance, and his performance was the main reason the Kings upset the Suns. It is not complicated. With so many players involved in so many games, there are rare events, or single performances, that fall two or three standard deviations from the mean. Bibby was off the cahrts this time. But next time?
 
i would like to just twist what brick stated a little while ago. there's nothing to get excited about a team that shows flashes once every 2 weeks. a crappy team that has a nice game every now and then, but does not have the coach or players to post winning streaks enough to make the postseason. we have 2 former all-stars on this team. bibby could be an all-star and kevin is on the rise. the type of performance we saw from bibby on sunday was monsterous. he showed no mercy. that is the type of performance we have expected from this guy since we signed him to this fat contract. and on sunday he showed us flashes of what he's capable of doing all season long; but hasnt. something was wrong this year and im sure we could all guess why
 
Yeah, I think that's a little bizarre. It mentions losing Bonzi, who obviously performed very well for us last season, but doesn't mention, even in passing, that we also lost the coach that brought us to the playoffs 8 seasons in a row. Very odd.....

Not if you think it's a non-factor, or relatively insignificant factor compared to everything else.
 
You know, these are the articles...

Every single team in the league has "flashes". EVERY one. Its the NBA, and these are the best basketball players in the world. Memphis just had a "flash" last night. The Bobcats beat the Spurs earlier this season, in San Antonio mind you. Having "flashes" amongst otherwise uninspired play is the sine qua non of the bad team. Its what defines them as such, the same way as aging players routinely have one good game in five but can't sustain. There is nothing unique about our performance, and no solution to it other than to rebuild and become a not so bad team. But rising up once every two weeks to play a good game means exactly squat in the NBA, and its no magical indication that gee, we should be doing this every night. Its no more than the top end of our particular bell curve.

Exactamundo! Unfortunately, they had one of those flashes against the Suns. Now, it's time for the flash to diminish to candle flame, and then a burning cinder.
 
You know, these are the articles...

Every single team in the league has "flashes". EVERY one. Its the NBA, and these are the best basketball players in the world. Memphis just had a "flash" last night. The Bobcats beat the Spurs earlier this season, in San Antonio mind you. Having "flashes" amongst otherwise uninspired play is the sine qua non of the bad team. Its what defines them as such, the same way as aging players routinely have one good game in five but can't sustain. There is nothing unique about our performance, and no solution to it other than to rebuild and become a not so bad team. But rising up once every two weeks to play a good game means exactly squat in the NBA, and its no magical indication that gee, we should be doing this every night. Its no more than the top end of our particular bell curve.

Exactamundo! Unfortunately, they had one of those flashes against the Suns. Now, it's time for the flash to diminish to candle flame, and then a smoldering cinder.
 
Back
Top