Keegan really isn't playing that badly offensively when you get down the nuts and bolts of it. Lately he has been struggling but over the year he's not that far behind his typical marks. The thing about Keegan is how much him hitting his shots at the middle road of year 1 and year 2 would actually do. Probably the biggest thing would be teams opening up the floor more but if Keegan kept at about this same 10-12 FGA per game average he's had since year 1 (and unless Fox or DeRozan start taking a back seat it's likely to stay this way) and hit 45% overall and 38% from 3, you're only talking roughly 0.4 more 3's per game. That means he's getting you roughly 1-2 more points per game on average. It would definitely help but I think more of the knocks on Keegan are the same ones previous players like Jason Thompson had. Perhaps people set the bar a little too high and didn't realize that even if Keegan were a superstar level talent, 12 FGA's ain't getting him there? He's been being developed into a 3 and D player this whole time and it's working.