Future of Vlade

If youngsters don’t show real improvement this year could it be Vlade’s last?


  • Total voters
    81
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

dude12

Hall of Famer
#31
That’s your opinion. Fox’s horrible advanced stats and Justin’s 3 point percentages are facts.
Your overreacting to a 19 year old’s stats on a team that was hyper young with aging vets. Fox looks to be at a minimum an average league PG but IMO and others, a high level PG on par with Conley, Teague, etc. if his shot also develops, like people believe it will, then he is an elite PG.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#32
Not knee jerk at all. He cleared space to sign a contributing free agent and failed. Targets were there who wouldn’t be matched for a number of reasons: McDermott, Hezonja, Anderson, Parker. Vlade struck out on all of them. At some point he has to be held accountable for lack of performance.
He removed two cancerous locker room presences. He never said it was about cap space. And he didn't make any signings that would not match our goals. The reason we struck out on Hezonja was because he wouldn't sign a multi-year deal He is playing for a pay day. If you don't see why that kind of player is against everything we want, then I think you're the one not getting it. The only other player we really were linked to officially was Lavine and he really wanted to come to Sac and play. Said so himself. Think about that, a player wanted to be in Sacramento instead of Chicago.
 
#33
I don't know why anyone would defend Vlade to death. We should not be giving him leeway room just because he was a former beloved player. If his name wasn't Vlade Divac, everyone would call for him to be fired already.

Yes Vlade has done some good, but he's done much worse so far. I find it funny people were saying that this previous year was the time things changed, yet we gave out Hill $20million only to luckily partially dump him 1/2year later to a desperate Cavs team. We gave ZBo $12million for 2yrs. We waived the #13 pick on our team just 1yr after drafting him AND picking up his team option for the next year. We basically cut our #22 pick from that previous year. WE ALSO FIRED OUR DIRECTOR OF SCOUTING 3/4 WAY INTO THIS SEASON. Not much has changed. Top prospects also didn't want to work out for us. Even Doncic didn't give us his medicals.

Team has zero bad contracts when most of the league gave out terrible deals two years ago
You do realize that the only reason why we don't have any terrible contracts is because those FAs signed elsewhere right? We swung and struck out on Wes Matthews. We swung and struck on Danny Green. We swung and struck out on Monta Ellis. We swung and struck out on Allen Crabbe.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
#34
He removed two cancerous locker room presences. He never said it was about cap space. And he didn't make any signings that would not match our goals. The reason we struck out on Hezonja was because he wouldn't sign a multi-year deal He is playing for a pay day. If you don't see why that kind of player is against everything we want, then I think you're the one not getting it. The only other player we really were linked to officially was Lavine and he really wanted to come to Sac and play. Said so himself. Think about that, a player wanted to be in Sacramento instead of Chicago.
Your whole response of actual facts will be ignored because it doesn’t fit that unrealistic line of thinking.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
#35
I don't know why anyone would defend Vlade to death. We should not be giving him leeway room just because he was a former beloved player. If his name wasn't Vlade Divac, everyone would call for him to be fired already.

Yes Vlade has done some good, but he's done much worse so far. I find it funny people were saying that this previous year was the time things changed, yet we gave out Hill $20million only to luckily partially dump him 1/2year later to a desperate Cavs team. We gave ZBo $12million for 2yrs. We waived the #13 pick on our team just 1yr after drafting him AND picking up his team option for the next year. We basically cut our #22 pick from that previous year. WE ALSO FIRED OUR DIRECTOR OF SCOUTING 3/4 WAY INTO THIS SEASON. Not much has changed. Top prospects also didn't want to work out for us. Even Doncic didn't give us his medicals.


You do realize that the only reason why we don't have any terrible contracts is because those FAs signed elsewhere right? We swung and struck out on Wes Matthews. We swung and struck on Danny Green. We swung and struck out on Monta Ellis. We swung and struck out on Allen Crabbe.
Deal in what we have on the roster. The goal was to have cap room going into next year. That is going to happen at this point. That is called executing a plan. You are combining an era when we were trying to get into the playoffs with Cousins and an era when we are clearly trying to build up through the draft. These are two different plans. I think all can agree that getting the team to the playoffs with Cousins was a fail. So did the organization and they started over. And to point, it’s going ok. It might be great if Fox, Bagley and Giles are our versions of our big 3. Only time will tell and that is the biggest problem people seem to have. Have a realistic timeline for this group.....or not.
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#37
Your whole response of actual facts will be ignored because it doesn’t fit that unrealistic line of thinking.
I'm impressed with what he's done since the Cousins trade. Which I hated at the time. Obviously we need a tangible improvement from last season to this, I think a 10 win improvement is realistic. We still won't make the playoffs but we might be exciting enough to attract some talent if they see we're heading the right direction. We'll be competing with a lot of teams but the really good ones won't have space. There will be options. I think with the exception of LeBron who wasn't going to come to Sacramento and a few other superstars that stayed with their team this was a weak free agent year anyways.
 
#38
Dude, Joerger has said why he’s taken the route he has. He’s said the timeline is several years in development. It’s been one year with this current group of young players. You choose to ignore what he has said because your unrealistic timeline doesn’t match with the guy in charge who has actually developed young talent. I’m going with the guy who has had success in real life and has a plan.
I've heard of this plan but to me a good plan doesnt include the team playing bad style of basketball. You know what Fox is as a player, he will not prosper by running horns sets on clogged floor. I have no idea how it will benefit him as a player when he hopefully never has to actually play in a system like that. But as I've been saying, hes got the team playing hard so I'm willing to give him another year to show he can adapt and run an efficent offense. If he can, great. If not, someone else can.

And please tell me what is this my "unrealistic timeline" and what does it have to do with anything? On previous posts I talked a little about Joeger and his style. The same identical style he played with in Memphis, the same he didnt adjust to fit our personell or the overall evolution of the league. What is this "timeline" and what it has to do with Joegers style of play?

Deal in what we have on the roster. The goal was to have cap room going into next year. That is going to happen at this point. That is called executing a plan.
It must not be a good plan if it includes having 24million worth of unplayable and untradeable salary in your books without even getting assets on wasting that amount of cap. If that is the plan, then the plan is wrong. That 24million of dead cap through two years could've been used to get an additional 1st rounder. Ending up just wasting 24mil on negative assets is just horrible
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
#39
I'm impressed with what he's done since the Cousins trade. Which I hated at the time. Obviously we need a tangible improvement from last season to this, I think a 10 win improvement is realistic. We still won't make the playoffs but we might be exciting enough to attract some talent if they see we're heading the right direction. We'll be competing with a lot of teams but the really good ones won't have space. There will be options. I think with the exception of LeBron who wasn't going to come to Sacramento and a few other superstars that stayed with their team this was a weak free agent year anyways.
Oh I think as I’ve mentioned in my previous post, too many are mixing different era’s when it comes to Vlade and Joerger. I am a Boogie fan and didn’t want to see him go but the fact is that what they were trying to do, which is get into playoffs, was a mess. They have switched gears and I see, in a short time, an increase in overall potential, obviously if that potential fails it’s a disaster.....but I also see this coaching staff developing our younger players. A young team needs time.
 
#40
Your overreacting to a 19 year old’s stats on a team that was hyper young with aging vets. Fox looks to be at a minimum an average league PG but IMO and others, a high level PG on par with Conley, Teague, etc. if his shot also develops, like people believe it will, then he is an elite PG.
I’m not over reacting by saying it’s not certain either will be a solid NBA player when they had those stats. Over reaction would be saying it’s certain they won’t and I have not said that statement at all.
 
#41
Hill was not a good signing. We have 12 million of dead Salary because of that signing, it cant be good. It was a misevaluation of his value if he was signed as a trade asset.



True. Bogdanovic was a good trade, Giles is looking like he might be good. Jury is still out on Bagley, he passed on a guy that was the consensus and clear favorite amongst fans so he better get that right.



Is that supoosed to be one of the good things Vlade has done? Instead of utilizing cap space to get assets, he took 40 million and spent it on vet "mentors". Now because of that we still got 24mil of dead unplayable and untradeable salary in our books this season. You get mentors for minimum salary. Anthony Tolliver, teammate of the year from Detroit(?) couldve mentored for minimum. Vlade decided to spend 40mim instead.



Joeger hasnt shown he is a long term solution for us. Hasnt adapted his playstyle to our players, playstyle that is completely outdated and using that, we are giving unnecesary advantage to our opponents. This is probably his last year to show he can adapt. If he cant he'll probably be gone after the season.



Chicago might have saved Vlade. Huge risk for an unproven injury prone player. Even at his best season his team wasnt better when he was on the court.



Zbo 24mil/2, bad contract and still 12mil on the books as dead salary.
GHill bad contract, 12mil dead salary still in our books because of that.
Papa G is currently dead salary in our books.
For some reason we stretched Barnes so there is still dead salary from him in our books.

Also in general about Vlade. The trade with sixers was just horrible. It wasnt even bad, it was horrible and a fireable act itself. Losing our own pick as a rebuilding team really hurts. That wasnt just a "miss", it was a disaster. He hasnt been able to create assets by using our cap space. A big mistake for a gm of a rebuilding team. Signing 40million worth "mentors" while refusing to use the space to get picks. Now its 24mil dead cap plus no assets from using it. Same thing is apparently happening this offseason.

One has to do some mental gymnastics to get Vlade to look even average. And I'm not going to be satisfied for average Gm. I want a good gm that really helps this franchise. Hopefully our next Gm will be just that.
Where are you making up this $12 mil in dead cap space from?
 
#42
Only Kings fans would call waiting until virtually all the unrestricted free agents are off the board a rush to judgement.

For what it’s worth, Jackson while looking marginally better still shot 31.9% from 3 for summer league. That doesn’t get it done for a 3 and D player. Journalists and NBA execs were incredulous that Vlade insists Bagley can play the three. We have a serious hole at 3 Vlade has done nothing to address.
So by sticking to their valuations of players and not overpaying or signing average players to long term deals, that's a bad thing? They have maintained their cap flexibility going forward.

This years FA market was crap compared to next year.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
#43
I've heard of this plan but to me a good plan doesnt include the team playing bad style of basketball. You know what Fox is as a player, he will not prosper by running horns sets on clogged floor. I have no idea how it will benefit him as a player when he hopefully never has to actually play in a system like that. But as I've been saying, hes got the team playing hard so I'm willing to give him another year to show he can adapt and run an efficent offense. If he can, great. If not, someone else can.

And please tell me what is this my "unrealistic timeline" and what does it have to do with anything? On previous posts I talked a little about Joeger and his style. The same identical style he played with in Memphis, the same he didnt adjust to fit our personell or the overall evolution of the league. What is this "timeline" and what it has to do with Joegers style of play?



It must not be a good plan if it includes having 24million worth of unplayable and untradeable salary in your books without even getting assets on wasting that amount of cap. If that is the plan, then the plan is wrong. That 24million of dead cap through two years could've been used to get an additional 1st rounder. Ending up just wasting 24mil on negative assets is just horrible
The plan has been to have cap space the following year. Is that going to happen? You know it is, you just don’t want to admit it. They said it from the start. Guys were brought in to help mentor and then have cap space. It’s a team full of nice young talent. Go ahead and be frustrated. I’m excited for what’s going on.
 
#46
The plan has been to have cap space the following year. Is that going to happen? You know it is, you just don’t want to admit it. They said it from the start. Guys were brought in to help mentor and then have cap space. It’s a team full of nice young talent. Go ahead and be frustrated. I’m excited for what’s going on.
They made the Hill trade to have space this year. If we still had Hill we would at least have a viable back up point guard.
 
#51
The plan has been to have cap space the following year. Is that going to happen? You know it is, you just don’t want to admit it. They said it from the start. Guys were brought in to help mentor and then have cap space. It’s a team full of nice young talent. Go ahead and be frustrated. I’m excited for what’s going on.
And as I've said, instead of using that cap space to gain an additional 1st rounder(s), they spent all of it on "mentors". Tolliver mentors for minimum, Vlade paid 24mil to Zbo, 19/year to Hill ect. Thats opportunity cost. The opportunity was a 1st rounder and we missed it. I've said this three times now. We have space for next year but cap space is valuable every year and we utlized it poorly last year
 
#53
at this moment Kings do not have wins, do not have big market, do not have even an all star player (although in past you saw that even that doesn't matter) and do not have players who can attract others by being close to tham as all of them are too young and under contract now.. so only way to make good FA is to overpay him as hell and in that case that would be too big of a gamble..

only player that could come to Kings now is Capela as he has some connections with Buddy and Bogdan, so he understands what Kings are and if they give him big contract, Rockets might not match it.. but in that case first WCS needs to go out and some SF needs to come..

Kings can attract players only by creating positive culture and then drafting ones that want to play here and then in a few years they might have chance at some of top FA.. and I always mention this, Vlade's biggest mistake so far is that he wasted draftpicks on trying to win with Cousins.. if he cut it at the begining picks would stay and Cousins value would be better than at the moment of a trade..

only other thing you could put him as a mistake is drafting Doncic, as he would fit in a whole at SF and then you could try to get Capela.. but to see was this mistake we will need to wait 4-5 years..

if you have problems with him not getting Hezonja, LaVine and Parker, you are basicaly having problem that he didn't max them for 4 years or at least in Hezonja case offer him 12+ milions.. in my opinion it would be too much and there will be better and less risky players in future, just have to wait..

atmosphere in a team is good, around a club is good, no drama, Joerger is a coach for third consecutive season, plenty of young talent, no bad contracts.. for a team that has a history as Kings have I think this is a step in a good direction..
 

pdxKingsFan

So Ordinary That It's Truly Quite Extraordinary
Staff member
#55
They made the Hill trade to have space this year. If we still had Hill we would at least have a viable back up point guard.
They moved him because he didn't want to be here. Same with Papa. Perhaps they took less back than they could have got if they would have taken on a bigger contract, but the move was about getting rid of a bad seed nothing more.
 

gunks

Hall of Famer
#56
Kings have never had good luck with free agency.

Doesn't help that the franchise's reputation is arguably the worst in the league.

I'm far from impressed with Vlade as GM, but that opinion can change real fast if Fox, Bagley, and Giles develop like we all hope they will. He's thrown together a very intriguing core. Gotta see how the kids look before we call for his head.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
#57
And as I've said, instead of using that cap space to gain an additional 1st rounder(s), they spent all of it on "mentors". Tolliver mentors for minimum, Vlade paid 24mil to Zbo, 19/year to Hill ect. Thats opportunity cost. The opportunity was a 1st rounder and we missed it. I've said this three times now. We have space for next year but cap space is valuable every year and we utlized it poorly last year
Yep, I don’t agree with you at all. They said they wanted these vets to help build and show the youngsters how to be professionals and to change the mindset in this organization. You may not agree with this but it’s hard to put into monetary worth except I believe having Temple, Carter, Zbo has been invaluable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.